Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

On everyday academic research

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-9-98-134

Abstract

In the fourth chapter of the book “The economy of the common good”, the nature of economics as a science and research practices in their theoretical and empirical aspects are discussed. The author considers the processes of modeling, empirical verification of models and evaluation of research quality. In addition, the features of economic cognition and the role of mathematics in economic research are analyzed, including the example of relevant research in game theory and information theory.

About the Author

J. Tirole
Toulouse School of Economics
France


References

1. Angrist J., Evans W. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply. Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 450-477.

2. Banerjee A., Duflo E. (2012). Repenser la pauvreté. Paris: Seuil.

3. Berlin I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox. An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

4. Dasgupta P. (2002). Modern economics and its critics. In: U. Mäki (ed.). Fact and fiction in economics. Models, realism and social construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Falk A., Tirole J. (2016). Narratives, imperatives and moral reasoning. Unpublished manuscript.

6. Fehr E., Falk A. (1999). Wage rigidity in a competitive incomplete contract market. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107, No. 1, pp. 106-134.

7. Fishman R., Kariv S., Markovits D. (2009). Exposure to ideology and distributional preferences. Unpublished manuscript.

8. Frey B., Meier S. (2005). Selfish and indoctrinated economists? European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 165-171.

9. Gollier Ch. (2012). Pricing the planet’s future? The economics of discounting in an uncertain world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

10. Levitt S., List J. (2009). Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. European Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 1-18.

11. Palacios-Huerta I. (2003). Professionals play Minimax. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 395-415.

12. Rodrik D. (2007). Why we use math in economics. Dani Rodrik’s Webblog, September 4. http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2007/09/why-we-use-math.html

13. Rodrik D. (2015). Economics rules. The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. New York: Norton.

14. Solow R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 65-94.

15. Tetlock Ph. (2005). Expert political judgement. How good is it? How can we know? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

16. Tetlock Ph., Gardner D. (2015). Superforcasting: The art and science of prediction New York: Crown.


Review

For citations:


Tirole J. On everyday academic research. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2017;(9):98-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-9-98-134

Views: 894


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)