

The “dividend puzzle” and the Russian stock market. Part 2
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-2-59-85
Abstract
The article analyzes the features of the dividend policy of Russian companies. The first part has contained an overview of academic literature and current trends. In the second part we discuss the results of empirical analysis that is based on a sample of 236 joint-stock companies. The motivation of Russian companies for maintaining the attractiveness of their shares during the period of significant increase of risks and volatility led to the growth of dividend yield. However, the increase of allocated profits observed in the largest state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to a large extent resulted from escalation of the tension in government finances. The threat of budget deficit growth led to partial substitution of tax income for dividend income from SOEs. At the same time some factors of uncertainty for SOEs’ operational strategies were increasing, especially those concerning long-term decisions in capital expenditure programs. The results of our analysis reveal that in private companies or SOEs, where the state has a limited influence on the dividend policy, the size of dividend payments to a greater extent depends on their financial performance, cash flows and the availability of promising investment projects. Moreover, the article shows that such companies are more likely to follow dividend smoothing strategies.
About the Authors
Alexander E. AbramovRussian Federation
Moscow
Alexander D. Radygin
Russian Federation
Moscow
Maria I. Chernova
Russian Federation
Moscow
Revold M. Entov
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Abramov A. E., Radygin A. D., Chernova M. I., Entov R. M. (2020). The “dividend puzzle” and the Russian stock market. Part 1. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 66—92. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-1-66-92
2. Stock J. H., Watson M. W. (2015). Introduction to econometrics. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).
3. Aivazian V., Booth L., Cleary S. (2003). Dividend policy and the organization of capital markets. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 101—121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-444X(02)00038-5
4. Baker M., Wurgler J. (2004). A catering theory of dividends. Journal of Finance, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 1125—1165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00658.x
5. Black F. (1976). The dividend puzzle. Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 5—8. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1976.408558
6. Booth L., Zhou J. (2017). Dividend policy: A selective review of results from around the world. Global Finance Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 1—15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.07.002
7. Bozos K., Nikolopoulos K., Ramgandhi G. (2011). Dividend signaling under economic adversity: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange. International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 20, pp. 364—374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2011.07.003
8. Cecchetti S. G., Kharroubi E. (2015). Why does financial sector growth crowd out real economic growth? BIS Working Papers, No. 490.
9. Dewenter K. L., Warther V. A. (1998). Dividends, asymmetric information, and agency conflicts: Evidence from a comparison of the dividend policies of Japanese and U.S. firms. Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 879—904. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00038
10. Easterbrook F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review, Vol. 74, No. 4, pp. 650—659.
11. Fama E. F., French K. R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 3—43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00038-1
12. Gordon J. R. (2018). Why has economic growth slowed when innovation appears to be accelerating? NBER Working Paper, No. 24554. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24554
13. Grullon G., Michaely R., Swaminathan B. (2002). Are dividend changes a sign of firm maturity? Journal of Business, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 387—424. https://doi.org/10.1086/339889
14. Gugler K. (2003). Corporate governance, dividend payout policy, and the interrelation between dividends, R&D, and capital investment. Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 27, No. 7, pp. 1297—1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00258-3
15. Gutiérrez G., Philippon T. (2017). Investmentless growth: An empirical investigation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 89—190. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2017.0013
16. Huang T., Wu F., Yu J., Zhang B. (2015). Political risk and dividend policy: Evidence from international political crises. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 574—595. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.2
17. Jensen M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 323—329.
18. Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 305—360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
19. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policy around the world. Journal of Finance, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 1—33. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00199
20. Lintner J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings and taxes. American Economic Review, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 97—113.
21. Miller M., Modigliani F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 411—433. https://doi.org/10.1086/294442
22. Miller M., Scholes M. (1978). Dividends and taxes. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 333—364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(78)90009-0
23. Shefrin H. M., Thaler R. H. (1988). The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 609—643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01520.x
Review
For citations:
Abramov A.E., Radygin A.D., Chernova M.I., Entov R.M. The “dividend puzzle” and the Russian stock market. Part 2. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2020;(2):59-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-2-59-85