|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
“Capital” as the key to solving modern economic problems (Offline addition to the discussion on the revival of a special seminar on Karl Marx’s “Capital”)
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-6-142-150
Abstract
In the article prepared in connection with the discussion on the use of the Marxist political economy heritage and the revival of a special seminar on Marx’s “Capital”, the author shows the dialectic of the relationship between the content and the transformed forms of the modern capitalist system; the potential of “Capital” to understand the content of the modern economy, and the potential of economics to understand its forms. On this basis, the author shows which questions of our time are answered by Marxist methodology and theory, and which are not, and concludes that Marxist political economy has significant methodological potential to become an important component of the scientific and educational process in current conditions.
References
1. Avtonomov V. S., Auzan A. A., Grigoryev L. M., Kolganov A. I., Nureev R. M., Khudokormov A. G., Shastitko A. E., Kurdin A. A. (2018). The role of Marx’s “Capital” studies in the formation of Russian economists (The roundtable discussion at Lomonosov Moscow State University). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 8, pp. 102—117. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-8-102-117
2. Belykh A.А., Mau V.А. (2018). Marx-XXI. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 8, pp. 57—87. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-8-57-87
3. Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I., Barashkova O. V. (2018). Classical political economy: Marxist version. Moscow: URSS. (In Russian).
4. Bulavka-Buzgalina L. A. (2018). Marx-XXI: Social progress and its price: Dialectics of alienation and disalie nation. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya, No. 5, pp. 73—84. (In Russian).
5. Gaidar E., Mau V. (2004a). Marxism: Between scientific theory and “secular religion” (liberal apology) (The beginning). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 4—27. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2004-5-4-27
6. Gaidar E., Mau V. (2004b). Marxism: Between scientific theory and “secular religion” (liberal apology) (The end). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 6, pp. 28—56. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2004-6-28-56
7. Hegel G. V. F. (2000). Phenomenology of spirit. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
8. Krasnikova E. V. (2012). Socio-economic portrait of the Russian model of capitalism. Moscow: TiRu. (In Russian).
9. Maksimtsev I. A., Miropolsky D. Yu., Tarasevich L. S. (eds.) (2016). Eurasian political economy. St. Petersburg: SPbGEU Publ. (In Russian).
10. Mamedov O. Yu. (2018). The non-market driver of a mixed economy. Terra Economicus, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 6—19. (In Russian).
11. Momdzhyan K. Kh. (2016). The hypothesis of social progress in modern social theory. Voprosy Filosofii, No. 10, pp. 36—46. (In Russian).
12. Momdzhyan K. Kh. (2018). On the possibility and criteria of social progress. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya, No. 5, pp. 51—57. (In Russian).
13. Nizhegorodtsev R. M. (2017). The methodology of K. Marx’s “Capital” and the concept of social progress. Voprosy Politicheskoy Ekonomii, No. 4, pp. 55—61. (In Russian).
14. Sadovnichy V. A. (2018). Marx and mathematics (speech at the International forum “Marx-XXI”. Moscow: Moscow State University, May 16). Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya, No. 5, pp. 3—8. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Buzgalin A.V. “Capital” as the key to solving modern economic problems (Offline addition to the discussion on the revival of a special seminar on Karl Marx’s “Capital”). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2019;(6):142-150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-6-142-150
Views:
1294
Email this article 
