

Cross-country analysis of public expenditures structure and efficiency
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-12-5-27
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problems of relationship between public expenditures and economic growth and methodical and practical problems of estimating expenditures efficiency. The authors note that productive expenditures (expenditures on human capital, social and economic infrastructure, research and development) have strong influence on economic growth. The comparative study of the effectiveness and efficiency of public expenditures was conducted, including productive expenditures (education and healthcare), for Russia and the sample of countries close to Russia by their economic development level. The indicators of the effectiveness and efficiency, econometric models, DEA method, and effectiveness and efficiency rankings based on them are used as measuring instruments in the study. According to the approach applied in the study, the rankings show relatively poor results for Russia in macroeconomic function performance of the public sector, in comparison to the other countries of the sample, but it is worth noting that the aggregated estimates are influenced by the selection of time period. Russia shows high results in education public expenditures efficiency and relatively poor results in healthcare public expenditures efficiency. Also, the productive expenditures level is low in Russia compared to the other countries close to Russia by their economic development level and OECD countries. This can limit economic growth in the mid-term and long-term prospects.
About the Authors
N. V. AkindinovaRussian Federation
Natalia V. Akindinova
Moscow
A. V. Chernyavsky
Russian Federation
Andrei V. Chernyavsky
Moscow
A. A. Chepel
Russian Federation
Alena A. Chepel
Moscow
References
1. Акиндинова Н., Чернявский А., Авдеева Д. (2017). Результативность бюджетных расходов в России и странах ОЭСР // Вопросы экономики. №. 2. С. 30—61. [Akindinova N., Chernyavsky A., Avdeeva D. (2017). Effectiveness of budget expenditures in Russia and OECD countries. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 2, pp. 3 0—61. (In Russian).]
2. Масгрейв Р., Масгрейв П. (2009). Государственные финансы: Теория и практика. М.: Бизнес Атлас. [Musgrave R., Musgrave P. (2009). Public finances in theory and practice. Moscow: Biznes Atlas. (In Russian).]
3. Afonso A., Schuknecht L., Tanzi V. (2003). Public sector efficiency: An international comparison. ECB Working Paper Series, No. 242.
4. Afonso A., Schuknecht L., Tanzi V. (2006). Public sector efficiency. Evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets. ECB Working Paper Series, No. 581.
5. Barro R. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5, pp. 103—126.
6. Barro R., Sala-i-Martin X. (1992). Public finance in models of economic growth. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 645—661.
7. Gemmell N., Kneller R., Sanz I. (2009). The composition of government expenditure and economic growth: Some evidence from OECD countries. In: European Commission . The quality of public finances and economic growth. Proceedings to the annual Workshop on public finances, Brussels, 28 November, pp. 17—45.
8. Gennaioli N., La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. (2013). Human capital and regional development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 128, No. 1, pp. 105—164.
9. Gupta S. et al. (1996). Unproductive public expenditures: A pragmatic approach to policy analysis. Washington, DC: IMF.
10. Gupta S., Kangur A., Papageorgiou C., Wane A. (2014). Efficiency-adjusted public capital and growth. World Development, Vol. 57, No. C, pp. 164—178.
11. Hanushek E, Woessmann L. (2015). Universal basic skills: What countries stand to gain. Paris: OECD.
12. IMF (2014). World economic outlook. Ch. 3. Is it time for an infrastructure push? The macroeconomic effects of public investment. Washington, DC.
13. Jaba E., Balan C. B., Robu I.-B. (2014). The relationship between life expectancy at bi rth and health expenditures esti mated by a cross- country and ti me-series analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 15, pp. 108—114.
14. OECD (2017). Government at a glance 2017. Paris: OECD Publ. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2017-en
15. Self S., Grabowski R. (2003). How effective is public health expenditure in improving overall health? A cross-country analysis. Applied Economics, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 835—845.
Review
For citations:
Akindinova N.V., Chernyavsky A.V., Chepel A.A. Cross-country analysis of public expenditures structure and efficiency. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018;(12):5-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-12-5-27