Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Poverty is no crime, but a problem to study (Nobel Memorial Prize in economics 2015 - Angus Deaton)

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-1-107-116

Abstract

The Nobel Prize in Economics in 2015 was awarded to Angus Deaton for his studies of consumer behavior, poverty and welfare. The paper provides an explanation of Deaton’s key academic achievements and his contribution to economics and policy making in the area of micro data collection and analysis.

About the Authors

A. Belianin
National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation


I. Denisova
New Economic School (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation


References

1. Deaton A. (2016). The great escape: Health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ.; Liberal Mission Foundation. (In Russian).

2. Blinder A., Deaton A. (1985). The time series consumption function revisited. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 2, pp. 465-521.

3. Case A., Deaton A. (2015). Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non- Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), Vol. 112, No. 49, pp. 15078-15083.

4. Deaton A. (1974). A reconsideration of the empirical implications of additive preferences. Economic Journal, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 338-348.

5. Deaton A., Muellbauer J. (1980a). Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

6. Deaton A., Muellbauer J. (1980b). An almost ideal demand system. American Economic Review, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 312-326.

7. Deaton A. (1985). Panel data from time series of cross-sections. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 30, No. 1-2, pp. 109-126.

8. Deaton A. (1987). Life-cycle models of consumption: Is the evidence consistent with the theory? In: T. Bewley (ed.). Advances in Econometrics. Vol. II. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

9. Deaton A. (1989). Looking for boy-girl discrimination in household expenditure data. World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-15.

10. Deaton A. (1991). Savings and liquidity constraints. Econometrica, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 1221-1248.

11. Deaton A. (1992). Understanding consumption. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12. Deaton A., Paxson C. (1994). Intertemporal choice and inequality. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 102, No. 3, pp. 437-467.

13. Deaton A. (1997). The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.

14. Flavin M. (1981). The adjustment of consumption to changing expectations about future income. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, No. 5, pp. 974-1009.

15. Hall R. E. (1978). Stochastic implications of the life-cycle-permanent income hypothesis: theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 971-987.

16. Hall R. E., Mishkin F. S. (1982). The sensitivity of consumption to transitory income: estimates from panel data on households. Econometrica Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 461-481.

17. Jackson M., Yariv L. (2015). The non-existence of representative agents. Unpublished Manuscript, Stanford University. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/ SSRN_ID2703061_code161894.pdf?abstractid=2684776&mirid=1.

18. MaCurdy T. E. (1981). An empirical model of labor supply in a life-cycle setting. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, No. 6, pp. 1059-1085.

19. Strotz R. H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 156-180.


Review

For citations:


Belianin A., Denisova I. Poverty is no crime, but a problem to study (Nobel Memorial Prize in economics 2015 - Angus Deaton). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2016;(1):107-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-1-107-116

Views: 969


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)