Preview

Вопросы экономики

Расширенный поиск
Доступ открыт Открытый доступ  Доступ закрыт Только для подписчиков

Нейробиология и новые возможности экспериментальной экономики

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-12-124-137

Полный текст:

Аннотация

Статья посвящена оценке первых достижений новой ветви междисциплинарных исследований на стыке экономической теории и нейробиологии. Проведен анализ основных результатов новых исследований, а также представлены ключевые направления критики нейроэкономики и ее сравнение с другими направлениями экспериментальной экономики. Показано, что несмотря на ряд интересных результатов, новое направление не сможет радикально изменить экономическую теорию в силу методологических ограничений, а также из-за различий в предмете исследований нейробиологов и экономистов.

Об авторе

А. А. Раквиашвили
МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова
Россия
к. э. н., доцент экономического факультета МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова (Москва)


Список литературы

1. Болдырев И.А. (2011). Экономическая методология сегодня: краткий обзор основных направлений // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 9. С. 47-70

2. Канеман Д., Тверски А. (2003). Рациональный выбор, ценности и фреймы // Психологический журнал. Т. 24. № 4. С. 31-42

3. Капелюшников Р. (2013a). Поведенческая экономика и «новый» патернализм. Часть I // Вопросы экономики. № 9. С. 66-90

4. Капелюшников Р. (2013b). Поведенческая экономика и «новый» патернализм. Часть II // Вопросы экономики. № 10. С. 28-46

5. Мяки У. (2008). Модели и эксперименты - это одно и то же // Вопросы экономики. № 11. C. 81-89

6. Саймон Г. (1993). Рациональность как процесс и продукт мышления // THESIS. Вып. 3. C. 16-38

7. Смит В. (2008). Экспериментальная экономика. М.: ИРИСЭН; Мысль

8. Andersen S., Ertaç S., Gneezy U., Hoffman M., List J. A. (2011). Stakes matter in Ultimatum games. American Economic Review, Vol. 101, No. 7, pp. 3427-3439.

9. Antonietti A. (2010). Do neurobiological data help us to understand economic decisions better? Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 207-218.

10. Antonietti A., Iannello P. (2011). Social sciences and neuroscience: a circular integration. International Review of Economics, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 307-317.

11. Armel K. C., Beaumel A., Rangel A. (2008). Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention. Judgment and Decision Making, No. 5, pp. 396-403.

12. Aydinonat N.E. (2010). Neuroeconomics: more than inspiration, less than revolution. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp.159-169.

13. Bechara A., Damásio A. R., Damásio H., Anderson S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, Vol. 50, No. 1-3, pp. 7-15.

14. Benhabib J., Bisin A. (2005). Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and selfcontrol: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption-saving decisions. Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 460-492.

15. Binmore K. (1999) Why experiment in economics? Economic Journal, Vol. 109, No. 453, pp. F16-F24.

16. Boarini R., Laslier J.F., Robin S. (2009). Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game. Theory and Decision, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp 341-373.

17. Camerer C. (2003). Behavioural studies of strategic thinking in games. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 225-231.

18. Camerer C., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 9-64.

19. Camerer C. F., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. (2004). Neuroeconomics: why economics needs brains. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, No. 3, pp. 555-579.

20. Clithero J. A., Tankersley D., Huettel S. A. (2008). Foundations of Neuroeconomics: From Philosophy to Practice. PLoS Biol, Vol. 6, No. 11: e298.

21. Coates J. M., Herbert J. (2008). Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor. PNAS, Vol. 105, No. 16, pp. 6167-6172.

22. De Martino B., Kumaran D., Seymour B., Dolan R. J. (2006). Frames, Biases, and Rational DecisionMaking in the Human Brain. Science, Vol. 313, No. 5787, pp. 684-687.

23. De Quervain D.J.F., Fischbacher U., Treyer V., Schellhammer M., Schnyder U., Buck A., Fehr E. (2004). The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment. Science, Vol. 305, No. 5688, pp. 1197-1352.

24. Dickhaut J., McCabe K., Nagode J. C., Rustichini A., Smith K., Pardo J. V. (2003). The Impact of the Certainty Context on the Process of Choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 100, No. 6, pp. 3536-3541.

25. Dohmen T., Falk A., Fliessbach K., Sunde U., Weber B. (2011). Relative versus absolute income, joy of winning, and gender: Brain imaging evidence. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 95, No. 3-4, pp. 279-285.

26. Dorris M. C., Glimcher P. W. (2004) Activity in posterior parietal cortex is correlated with the relative Subjective desirability of action. Neuron, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 365-378. Dresher M. (1962) A sampling inspection problem in arms control agreements: a gametheoretic analysis (Memorandum RM2972ARPA). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

27. Fumagalli R. (2015). Five theses on neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology [forthcoming].

28. А. Раквиашвили Gul F., Pesendorfer W. (2008). The case for mindless economics. In: A. Caplin, A. Shotter (eds.). The foundations of positive and normative economics. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-39.

29. Güth W., Schmittberger R., Schwarze B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 367-388.

30. Hampton A. N., Bossaerts P., O’Doherty J. P. (2008). Neural correlates of mentalizingrelated computations during strategic interactions in humans. PNAS, Vol. 105, No. 18, pp. 6741-6746.

31. Harrison G., Ross D. (2010). The methodologies of neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 185-196.

32. Hogarth R. M. (2005). The challenge of representative design in psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 253-263.

33. Hudík M. (2011). Why economics is not a science of behavior. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 147-162.

34. Izuma K., Matsumoto M., Murayama K., Samejima K., Sadato N., Matsumoto K. (2010). Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choiceinduced preference change. PNAS, Vol. 107, No. 51, pp. 22014-22019.

35. Kable J. W. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience toolkit for the neuroeconomist: A functional overview. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 63-84.

36. Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. S285-S300.

37. Koenigs M., Kruepke M., Newman J. P. (2010). Economic decisionmaking in psychopathy: A comparison with ventromedial prefrontal lesion patients. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 48, No. 7, pp. 2198-2204.

38. Krueger F., McCabe K., Moll J., Kriegeskorte N., Zahn R., Strenziok M., Heinecke A., Grafman J. (2007). Neural correlates of trust. PNAS, Vol. 104, No. 50, pp. 20084-20089.

39. Laibson D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 443-477.

40. Loewenstein G., O’Donoghue T. (2004). Animal spirits: Affective and deliberative influences on economic behavior (Working Paper 0414). Ithaca, NY: CaregieMellon University, Department of Social and Decision Sciences.

41. Lohrenz T., McCabe K., Camerer C. F., Montague P. R. (2007). Neural signature of fictive learning signals in a sequential investment task. PNAS, Vol. 104, No. 22, pp. 9493-9498.

42. McCabe K., Houser D., Ryan L., Smith V., Trouard T. (2001). A functional imaging study of cooperation in twoperson reciprocal exchange. PNAS, Vol. 98, No. 20, pp. 11832-11835.

43. McClure S. M., Li J., Tomlin D., Cypert K. S., Montague L. M., Montague P. R. (2004). Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 379-387.

44. Mikolajczak M., Gross J. J., Lane A., Corneille O., de Timary P., Luminet O. (2010). Oxytocin makes people trusting, not gullible. Psychological Science, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 1072-1074.

45. Miller E. K., Cohen J. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, Vol. 24, pp. 167-202.

46. Montague P.R., Berns G.S. (2002). Neural Economics and the Biological Substrates of Valuation. Neuron, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 265-284.

47. Naqvi N., Shiv B., Bechara A. (2006). The role of emotion in decision making: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 260-264.

48. PadoaSchioppa C. (2008). The syllogism of neuroeconomics. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 24, Special Issue 03, pp 449-457.

49. Park J. W., Zak P. J. (2007). Neuroeconomics studies. Analyse and Kritik, Vol. 29, No 1, pp. 47-59.

50. Plassmann H., O’Doherty J., Shiv B., Rangel A. (2008) Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness. PNAS, Vol. 105, No. 3, pp. 1050-1054.

51. Platt M. L., Glimcher P. W. (1999). Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature, Vol. 400, No. 6741, pp. 233-238.

52. Raab G., Elger C. E., Neuner M., Weber B. (2011) A Neurological Study of Compulsive Buying Behaviour. Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 401-413.

53. Robbins L. (1938). Interpersonal comparisons of utility: A comment. Economic Journal, Vol. 48, No. 1938, pp. 635-641.

54. Rubinstein A. (2003). “Economics and psychology”? The case of hyperbolic discounting. International Economic Review, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 1207-1216.

55. Sanfey A. G., Rilling J. K., Aronson J. A., Nystrom L. E., Cohen J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decisionmaking in the ultimatum game. Science, Vol. 300, No. 5626, pp. 1755-1758.

56. Sescousse G., Caldú X., Segura B., Dreher J.C. (2013). Processing of primary and secondary rewards: A quantitative metaanalysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 681-689.

57. Singer T., Fehr E. (2005) The Neuroeconomics of Mind Reading and Empathy. American Economic Review, Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 340-345.

58. Smidts A., Hsu M., Sanfey A. G., Boksem M. A. S., Ebstein R. B., Huettel S. A., Kable J. W., Karmarkar U. R., Kitayama S., Knutson B., Liberzon I., Lohrenz T., Stallen M., Yoon C. (2014). Advancing consumer neuroscience, Marketing Letters, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 257267.

59. Søberg M. (2005). The DuhemQuine thesis and experimental economics: A reinterpretation. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 581-597.

60. Tobler P. N., Christopoulos G. I., O’Doherty J. P., Dolan R. J., Schultz W. (2009). Riskdependent reward value signal in human prefrontal cortex. PNAS, Vol. 106, No. 17, pp. 7185-7190.

61. Vromen J. (2010). On the surprising finding that expected utility is literally computed in the brain. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 17-36.

62. Zak P. J. (2011). The physiology of moral sentiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 53-65.

63. Lomonosov Moscow State University (Moscow, Russia)


Для цитирования:


Раквиашвили А.А. Нейробиология и новые возможности экспериментальной экономики. Вопросы экономики. 2015;(12):124-137. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-12-124-137

For citation:


Rakviashvili A. Neurobiology and New Opportunities for Experimental Economics. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2015;(12):124-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-12-124-137

Просмотров: 41


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)