Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Dilemmas of an Economic Theorist

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-11-62-80

Abstract

The paper discusses four dilemmas encountered by an economic theorist. The dilemma of absurd conclusions: should we abandon a model if it produces absurd conclusions or should we regard a model as a very limited set of assumptions that will inevitably fail in some contexts? The dilemma of responding to evidence: should our models be judged according to experimental results? The dilemma of modelless regularities: should models provide the hypothesis for testing or are they simply exercises in logic that have no use in identifying regularities? The dilemma of relevance: do economists have the right to offer advice or to make statements that are intended to influence the real world?

About the Author

Ar. Rubinstein
Tel Aviv University; New York University
Israel


References

1. Basu K. The Traveler's Dilemma: Paradoxes of Rationality in Game Theory // American Economic Review. 1994. No 84. P. 391-395.

2. Cox J. C., Sadiraj V. Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: Coherence for Small-and Large-Stakes Gambles. Mimeo. 2001.

3. Kahneman D. Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics // American Economic Review. 2003. No 93. P. 1449-1475.

4. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk // Econometrica. 1979. No 47. P. 263-292.

5. Laibson D. Hyperbolic Discount Functions, Undersaving, and Savings Policy // Working Paper 5635 / NBER. 1996.

6. Piccione M., Rubinstein A. Equilibrium in the Jungle. Mimeo. 2003.

7. Rabin M. Risk Aversion and Expected Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem // Econometrica. 2000. Vol. 68, No 5. P. 1281-1292.

8. Rabin M., Thaler R. Anomalies: Risk Aversion // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2001. Vol. 15, No 1. P. 219-232.

9. Rubinstein A. A Skeptic's Comment on the Studies of Economics // Economic Journal 2006. No 116. P. C1-C9.

10. Rubinstein A. Economics and Psychology? The Case of Hyperbolic Discounting // International Economic Review. 2003. No 44. P. 1207-1216.

11. Rubinstein A. Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times. Mimeo. 2004.

12. Rubinstein A. Modeling Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998; Rubinstein A.Comments on the Risk and Time Preferences in Economics. Mimeo. 2001.

13. Savage L. The Foundations of Statistics. 2nd ed. N. Y.: Dover, 1972.

14. Stanovich K. E., West R. F. Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2000. No 23. P. 645-665.

15. Strotz R. H. Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization // Review of Economic Studies.1955-1956. Vol. 23, No 3. P. 165-180.


Review

For citations:


Rubinstein A. Dilemmas of an Economic Theorist. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2008;(11):62-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-11-62-80

Views: 1230


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)