|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Modeling the Mechanisms of Russian Labour Market
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-11-5-29
Abstract
We investigate the relationship between the key labour market indicators: productivity, real wages, and unemployment rate. The analysis is based on quarterly data for the period Q1 1995 to Q3 2013. The period free of crises (early 1999 to mid-2008) is additionally considered to check the crisis effects. We estimate vector error correction model (VECM). Cointegration was found among the main labour market variables. The model coefficient signs fully corresponded to the economic logic, and their magnitudes were almost identical for both time spans. No significant asymmetry to positive and negative deviations from the long-term trend was revealed at the Russian labour market. The model has allowed to measure contribution of different channels to the wage growth. We find that productivity growth and decline in unemployment had similar impact on the wage change over the period under consideration. Our results explain thus the observed unusual trend of marked increase of the wage share in GDP. Contrary to standard beliefs, cross-country comparisons show neither an increased reaction of wages nor a weak reaction of employment to productivity or output shocks.
About the Authors
E. Vakulenko
National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. Gurvich
Economic Expert Group (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Akhundova O. V., Korovkin A. G., Korolev I. B. (2005). Interrelation of GDP dynamics and unemployment: Theoretical and practical aspect. In: A. G. Korovkin (ed.). Scientific Works: Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow: MAKS Press, pp. 471—497. (In Russian).
2. Vakulenko E., Gurvich E. (2015). The relationship of GDP, unemployment rate and employment: In-depth analysis of Okun’s law for Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 3, pp. 5—27. (In Russian).
3. Gafarov B. N. (2011). Phillips curve and labour market forming in Russia. Ekonomicheskii Zhurnal VShE, No. 2, pp. 155—176. (In Russian).
4. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2001). Russian labour marker: Adaptation without reconstruction. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).
5. OECD (2011). OECD reviews of labour market and social policies: Russian Federation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
6. Abbritti M., Fahr S. (2011). Macroeconomic implications of downward wage rigidities. ECB Working Paper, No. 1321, pp. 1-34.
7. Andrews D. W. K., Zivot E. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 251-270.
8. Arpaia A., Curci N. (2010). EU labour market behaviour during the great recession. European Economy - Economic Papers, No. 405, pp. 1-53.
9. Arpaia A., Mourre G. (2009). Institutions and performance in European labour markets: Taking a fresh look. European Economy - Economic Papers, No. 391, pp. 1-51.
10. Blanchard O., Solow R., Wilson B. (2007). Productivity and unemployment. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
11. Blanchard O., Katz L. (1999). Wage dynamics: Reconciling theory and evidence. American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 69-74.
12. Clar M., Dreger C., Ramos R. (2007). Wage flexibility and labour market institutions: A meta-analysis. Kyklos, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 145-163.
13. Clemente J., Montaсés A., Reyes M. (1998). Testing for a unit root in variables with a double change in the mean. Economics Letters, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 175-182.
14. Darius R., Nkusu M., Thomas A. et al. (2010). Cross-cutting themes in employment experiences during the crisis. IMF Staff Position Note. No. SPN/10/18.
15. Dohmen T., Lehmann H., Schaffer M. (2014). Wage policies of a Russian firm and the financial crisis of 1998: Evidence from personnel data - 1997 to 2002. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 504-531.
16. ECB (2012). Euro area labour markets and the crisis. Occasional Paper Series, No. 138.
17. Eichhorst W., Feil M., Marx P. (2010). Crisis, what crisis? Patterns of adaptation in European labor markets. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 5045, pp. 1-33.
18. Gali J. (1996). Technology, employment, and the business cycle: Do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations? NBER Working Paper, No. 5721.
19. Gimpelson V., Lippoldt D. (2000). The Russian labour market: Between transition and turmoil. L.: Roman & Litlefield.
20. Gimpelson V., Kapeliushnikov R. (2011). Labor market adjustment: Is Russia different? IZA Discussion Paper, No. 5588.
21. Goh S. K., Wong K. N. (2010). Analyzing the productivity-wage-unemployment nexus in Malaysia: Evidence from the macroeconomic perspective. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol. 53, October, pp. 145-156.
22. Hansen B. E. (1996). Estimation of TAR models. Boston College Working Papers in Economics, No. 325.
23. Harris R., Silverstone B. (2001). Testing for asymmetry in Okun’s law: A cross-country comparison. Economics Bulletin, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 1-13.
24. Ibragimov M., Karimov J., Permyakova E. (2012). Unemployment and output dynamics in CIS countries: Okun’s law revisited. EERC Working Paper, No E13/04.
25. IMF (2010). Unemployment dynamics during recessions and recoveries: Okun’s law and beyond. In: World economic outlook: Rebalancing growth. Ch. 3. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, pp. 87-126.
26. Karabarbounis L., Neiman B. (2013). The global decline of the labor share. NBER Working Paper, No. 19136.
27. Kargi B. (2014). Okun’s law and long term co-integration analysis for OECD countries (1987-2012). International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol. 119, February, pp. 77-85.
28. Klein N. (2012). Real wage, labor productivity, and employment trends in South Africa: A closer look. IMF Working Paper, No. WP/12/92.
29. Konings J., Lehmann H. (2002). Marshall and labor demand in Russia: Going back to basics. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 134-159.
30. Kwiatkowski D., Phillips P. C. B., Schmidt P., Shin Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 54, No. 1-3, pp. 159-178.
31. Layard R., Richter A. (1995). Labour market adjustment - the Russian way. In: A. Åslund (ed.). Russian economic reform at risk. London: Pinter, pp. 119-148.
32. Meager N., Speckesser S. (2011). Wages, productivity and employment: A review of theory and international data. European Employment Observatory Thematic Expert ad-hoc Paper. Institute for Employment Studies.
33. Millea M. (2002). Disentangling the wage-productivity relationship: Evidence from select OECD member countries. International Advances in Economic Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 314-323.
34. OECD (2013). Protecting jobs, enhancing flexibility: A new look at employment protection legislation. Ch. 2. In: OECD employment outlook 2013. Paris: OECD Publ., pp. 65-126.
35. Pascalau R. (2007). Productivity shocks, unemployment persistence, and the adjustment of real wages in OECD countries. MPRA Paper, No. 7222.
36. Shapiro C., Stiglitz J. (1984). Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. American Economic Review, Vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 433-444.
37. Venn D. (2009). Legislation, collective bargaining and enforcement. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 89.
38. Wakeford J. (2004). The productivity-wage relationship in South Africa: An empirical investigation. Development Southern Africa, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 109-132.
39. Woitek U. (2004). Real wages and business cycle asymmetries. CES IFO Working Paper, No. 1206.
Review
For citations:
Vakulenko E., Gurvich E. Modeling the Mechanisms of Russian Labour Market. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2015;(11):5-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-11-5-29
Views:
1007
Email this article 
