

"Resource Blessing": R&D and Sweet Water Deficit
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-11-25-40
Abstract
Shortening of available volumes of a natural resource can become an engine for the development of new technologies, which could help using it more effectively. The article considers the case of Israel - the state that encounters sweet water deficit. Accessible average volume of this resource is in some sense random and hard to predict. Ordinary pricing mechanisms are difficult to implement due to political and social considerations. A range of measures has made private firms use an already existing intellectual resource to develop R&D aiming to make water use more effective. This can be viewed as a process of efficient substituting a deficit natural resource with a non-deficit intellectual one.
About the Authors
M. LevinRussian Federation
N. Shilova
Russian Federation
References
1. Боаз Д. Цены как деформаторы распределения воды в экономике // = The Economic Quarterly. 1976. No 91. P. 129-142 (на иврите).
2. Государственный контролер. Отчет по водной политике № 41. 1990 (на иврите).
3. Мозенсон Р. Водный кризис в Израиле: регулирование и финансирование и правительственный и общественный учет // = The Economic Quarterly. 1991. No 150. P. 479-487 (на иврите).
4. Нельсон Р., Уинтер С. Эволюционная теория экономических изменений. М.: Дело, 2002.
5. Acemoglu D. Directed Technical Change // Review of Economic Studies. 2002. Vol. 69, No 4. P. 781-809.
6. Allan T. The Middle East Water Question. L.: Tauris, 2001.
7. Arrow K. J. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resoures for Inventions // The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity / R. Nelson (ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962. P. 609-625.
8. Barbier E. B. Natural Capital and the Economics of Environment and Development // Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability / A. M. Jansson, M. Hammer, C. Folke, R. Costanza (eds.). Washington, DC: Island Press, 1994.
9. Barbier E. B. Natural Capital and the Economics of Environment and Development.
10. Beaumont P. The Quest for Water Efficiency - Restructuring of Water Use in the Middle East // Environmental Challenges / S. Belkin, S. Gabbay (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000. Р. 555.
11. Bental B., Peled D. Quantitative Growth Effects of Subsidies in a Search Theoretic R&D Model // Journal of Еvolutionary Еconomics. 2002. Vol. 12, No 4. P. 397-423.
12. Carruthers I. D., Morrison J. A. Institutions in Water Resource Management: Insights From New Institutional Economics // Water Policy: Allocation and Management in Practice. Proceedings of International Conference on Water Policy, Cranfield University, September 23-24, 1996 / Р. Howsam, R. Carter (eds.). L.: E & FN Spon, 1996. P. 205-212.
13. Dasgupta P. S., Heal G. E. The Economics of Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
14. Espey M., Espey J., Shaw W. D. Price Elasticity of Residential Demand for Water: A Meta-Analysis // Water Resources Research. 1997. Vol. 33, No 6. P. 1369-1374.
15. Fleischer A., Lichtman I., Mendelsohn R. Climate Change, Irrigation, and Israeli Agriculture: Will Warming Be Harmful? // Ecological economics. 2008. Vol. 65, No 3. P. 508-515.
16. Goel R. K. Economic Models of Technological Change: Theory and Application. Westport, CT: Quorum books, 1999.
17. Hewitt J. A., Hanemann W. M. A Discrete/ Continuous Choice Approach to Residential Water Demand under Block Rate Pricing// Land Economics. 1995. Vol. 71, No 2. P. 173-192.
18. Homer-Dixon T. F. The Ingenuity Gap: Can Poor Countries Adapt to Resource Scarcity // Population and Development Review. 1995. Vol. 21, No 3. P. 587-612.
19. Kamien M. I., Schwartz N. L. Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
20. Kislev Y. Real and Ideal Water Rights: the Рrospects for Water-Rights Reform in Israel, Gaza, and West Bank / University of California. Berkeley, 2008.
21. Kislev Y. The Water Economy of Israel // Discussion Paper No 11.01 / Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2001.
22. Moore J. W. Defining National Property Rights to a Common Property Resource: The Case of the West Bank Aquifers // Resource and Energy Economics. 1994. Vol. 16, No 4. P. 373-390.
23. Morag N. Water, Geopolitics and State Building: The Case of Israel // Middle Eastern Studies. 2001. Vol. 37, No 3. P. 179-198.
24. Nelson R. R. Understanding Technical Change as an Evolutionary Process. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1987.
25. Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap press, 1982.
26. Olmstead S., Hanemann W., Stavins R. Does Price StructureMatter? Household Water Demand Under Increasing-Block and Uniform Prices. New Haven, CT: Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 2004.
27. Portnov B. A., Meir I. Urban Water Consumption in Israel: Convergence or Divergence? // Environmental Science & Policy. 2008. Vol. 11, No 4. P. 347-358.
28. Rogers P., Silva R. de, Ramesh B. Water is an Economic Good: How to Use Prices to Promote Equity, Efficiency, and Sustainability // Water Policy. 2002. Vol. 4, No 1. Р. 1-17.
29. Romer P. Endogenous Technological Change // Journal of Political Economy. 1990. Vol. 98, No 5. Р. S71-S102.
30. Ruttan V. W. Induced Innovation, Evolutionary Theory and Path Dependence: Sources of Technical Change // Economic Journal. 1997. Vol. 107, No 444. P. 1520-1529.
31. Vega-Redondo F. Technological Change and Market Structure: an Evolutionary Approach // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 1996. Vol. 14, No 2. P. 203-226.
Review
For citations:
Levin M., Shilova N. "Resource Blessing": R&D and Sweet Water Deficit. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2010;(11):25-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-11-25-40