Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Ethics of Efficiency
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-12-58-71
Abstract
The article considers problems and contradictions arising from applications of the concept of Pareto-efficiency as the most widely used criterion for evaluating efficiency of economic outcomes. The author shows that this criterion is inadequate when applied to ethical issues. An accent on utility and strict adherence to the principles of freedom of choice are impediments to the correct evaluation of perverse needs, waste of resources or preferences which are potentially harmful for others. The article proposes another efficiency criterion based on minimizing resource waste. This criterion is better suited for following the principles of equity and justice than the Pareto-efficiency concept.
References
1. Abu-Ghaida D., Klasen S. The Costs of missing the Millenium Development Goal on Gender Equity // World Development. 2004. Vol. 32, No 7.
2. Altman M. The Nobel Prize in Behavioral and Experimental Economics: A Contextual and Critical Appraisal of the Contributions of Daniel Kahneman and Vernon Smith // Review of Political Economy. 2004. Vol. 16.
3. Bailey M. Studies in Positive and Normative Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1992.
4. Berg N. Normative Behavioral Economics // Journal of Socio-Economics. 2003. No 32. P. 411-427.
5. Bergson A. Essays in Normative Economics. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.
6. Blaug M. Is Competition Such a Good Thing? Static Efficiency versus Dynamic Efficiency // Review of Industrial Organization. 2001. Vol. 19, No 1. P. 47.
7. Boulding K. A Preface to Grants Economics. The Economy of Love and Fear. N. Y.: Praeger, 1981.
8. Bowles S., Gintis H. Markets and Democracy: Participation, Accountability and Efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. P. 29.
9. Dasgupta P. An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
10. Diener E., Seligman M. Beyond Money. Toward an Economy of Well-Being // Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2004. Vol. 5, No 1. P. 1-31.
11. Dworkin R. Why Efficiency? // A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
12. Easterlin R. Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory // Economic Journal. 2001. Vol. 111, No 473. P. 465-484; Happiness in Economics / R. Easterlin (ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002.
13. Frey B., Stutzer A. Happiness and Economics. How the Economy and Institutions Affect Well-Being. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
14. Frey B., Stutzer A. Happiness and Economics. How the Economy and Institutions Affect Well-Being. P. 10-11.
15. George D. Preference Pollution. How Markets Create the Desires We Dislike. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001.
16. Inequality, Growth and Poverty in an Era of Liberalization and Globalization / G. Cornea (ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
17. Kolm S.-C. A Historical Introduction to Normative Economics // Socal Choice and Welfare. 2000. No 17.
18. Kolm S.-C. Rational Normative Economics vs. «Social Welfare» and «Social Choice» // European Economic Review. 1994. No 38.
19. Kurien C. Rethinking Economics. Reflections Based on a Study of the Indian Economy. New Delhi: Sage, 1996.
20. Lee F., Keen S. The Incoherent Emperor: A Heterodox Critique of Neoclassical Microeconomic Theory // Review of Social Economy. 2004. Vol. 62, No 2. P. 169-199.
21. Lutz M. Economics for the Common Good. Two Centuries of Social Economic Thought in the Humanistic Tradition. L.: Routledge, 1999.
22. Mishan E. Introduction to Normative Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
23. Mongin P. A Сoncept of Progress of Normative Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
24. Nussbaum M. Women and Human Development. The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
25. Pigou A. S. The Economics of Welfare. 3rd ed. L.: Macmillan, 1929.
26. Platteu P. Institutions, Social Norms, and Economic Development. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Press, 2000.
27. Putnam H., Walsh V. Facts, Theories, Values ans Desitutions in the Works of Sir Partha Dasgupta // Review of Political Economy. 2007. Vol. 19, No 2. P. 188.
28. Qizilbash M. Incommensurability and the First Fundamental Welfare Theorem // Oxford Economic Papers. 2005. Vol. 57.
29. Reid M. Economics of Household Production. N. Y., L.: Wiley, Chapman&Hal, 1934.
30. Reid M. Food for People. N. Y., L.: Wiley, Chapman&Hall, 1943.
31. Roth J. The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. L.: Macmillan, 1995.
32. Schultz W. The Moral Conditions of Economic Efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
33. Sen A. On Economic Enequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Expanded Edition, 1997.
34. Sen A. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
35. Sen A. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2002.
36. Smith A. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Vol. I // Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Vol. II. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1981.
37. Staveren I. Feminist Fiction and Feminist Economics. Charlotte Perkins Gilman on Efficiency // Toward a Feminist Philosophy of Economics / D. Barker, E. Kuiper (eds.). L.: Routledge, 2003. P. 56-69.
38. Stilwell F. Normative Economics: an Introduction to Microeconomic Theory and Radical Critiques. Oxford: Pergamon, 1975.
39. Stutzer A. What are the Sources of Happiness? // Inspiring Economics. Human Motivation in Political Economy / B. Frey (ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001. P. 135-146.
40. Walsh V. Rationality, Allocation and Reproduction. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.
41. Walsh V. Sen after Putnam // Review of political economy. 2003. Vol. 15, No 3. P. 315-394.
42. Walsh V. Smith after Sen // Review of Political Economy. 2000. Vol. 12, No 1. P. 5–25.
43. Zerbe R. Economic Efficiency in Law and Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001.
Review
For citations:
van Staveren I. Ethics of Efficiency. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2009;(12):58-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-12-58-71
Views:
768
Email this article 
