Открытый доступ
Только для подписчиков
Этика эффективности
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-12-58-71
Аннотация
В статье рассматриваются проблемы и противоречия наиболее важного критерия экономической эффективности - критерия Парето. Автор показывает, что этот критерий оказывается несостоятельным в контексте этической постановки вопроса. Ориентация на полезность и строгое следование принципам свободного обмена непригодны для оценки извращенных потребностей, растраты ресурсов или предпочтений, потенциально опасных для других людей. В статье предлагается другой критерий эффективности, основанный на минимизации расточительного использования ресурсов. Данный критерий лучше, чем критерий Парето-эффективности, помогает соблюсти принципы справедливости.
Список литературы
1. Abu-Ghaida D., Klasen S. The Costs of missing the Millenium Development Goal on Gender Equity // World Development. 2004. Vol. 32, No 7.
2. Altman M. The Nobel Prize in Behavioral and Experimental Economics: A Contextual and Critical Appraisal of the Contributions of Daniel Kahneman and Vernon Smith // Review of Political Economy. 2004. Vol. 16.
3. Bailey M. Studies in Positive and Normative Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1992.
4. Berg N. Normative Behavioral Economics // Journal of Socio-Economics. 2003. No 32. P. 411-427.
5. Bergson A. Essays in Normative Economics. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.
6. Blaug M. Is Competition Such a Good Thing? Static Efficiency versus Dynamic Efficiency // Review of Industrial Organization. 2001. Vol. 19, No 1. P. 47.
7. Boulding K. A Preface to Grants Economics. The Economy of Love and Fear. N. Y.: Praeger, 1981.
8. Bowles S., Gintis H. Markets and Democracy: Participation, Accountability and Efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. P. 29.
9. Dasgupta P. An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
10. Diener E., Seligman M. Beyond Money. Toward an Economy of Well-Being // Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2004. Vol. 5, No 1. P. 1-31.
11. Dworkin R. Why Efficiency? // A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
12. Easterlin R. Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory // Economic Journal. 2001. Vol. 111, No 473. P. 465-484; Happiness in Economics / R. Easterlin (ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002.
13. Frey B., Stutzer A. Happiness and Economics. How the Economy and Institutions Affect Well-Being. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
14. Frey B., Stutzer A. Happiness and Economics. How the Economy and Institutions Affect Well-Being. P. 10-11.
15. George D. Preference Pollution. How Markets Create the Desires We Dislike. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001.
16. Inequality, Growth and Poverty in an Era of Liberalization and Globalization / G. Cornea (ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
17. Kolm S.-C. A Historical Introduction to Normative Economics // Socal Choice and Welfare. 2000. No 17.
18. Kolm S.-C. Rational Normative Economics vs. «Social Welfare» and «Social Choice» // European Economic Review. 1994. No 38.
19. Kurien C. Rethinking Economics. Reflections Based on a Study of the Indian Economy. New Delhi: Sage, 1996.
20. Lee F., Keen S. The Incoherent Emperor: A Heterodox Critique of Neoclassical Microeconomic Theory // Review of Social Economy. 2004. Vol. 62, No 2. P. 169-199.
21. Lutz M. Economics for the Common Good. Two Centuries of Social Economic Thought in the Humanistic Tradition. L.: Routledge, 1999.
22. Mishan E. Introduction to Normative Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
23. Mongin P. A Сoncept of Progress of Normative Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
24. Nussbaum M. Women and Human Development. The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
25. Pigou A. S. The Economics of Welfare. 3rd ed. L.: Macmillan, 1929.
26. Platteu P. Institutions, Social Norms, and Economic Development. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Press, 2000.
27. Putnam H., Walsh V. Facts, Theories, Values ans Desitutions in the Works of Sir Partha Dasgupta // Review of Political Economy. 2007. Vol. 19, No 2. P. 188.
28. Qizilbash M. Incommensurability and the First Fundamental Welfare Theorem // Oxford Economic Papers. 2005. Vol. 57.
29. Reid M. Economics of Household Production. N. Y., L.: Wiley, Chapman&Hal, 1934.
30. Reid M. Food for People. N. Y., L.: Wiley, Chapman&Hall, 1943.
31. Roth J. The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. L.: Macmillan, 1995.
32. Schultz W. The Moral Conditions of Economic Efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
33. Sen A. On Economic Enequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Expanded Edition, 1997.
34. Sen A. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
35. Sen A. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2002.
36. Smith A. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Vol. I // Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Vol. II. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1981.
37. Staveren I. Feminist Fiction and Feminist Economics. Charlotte Perkins Gilman on Efficiency // Toward a Feminist Philosophy of Economics / D. Barker, E. Kuiper (eds.). L.: Routledge, 2003. P. 56-69.
38. Stilwell F. Normative Economics: an Introduction to Microeconomic Theory and Radical Critiques. Oxford: Pergamon, 1975.
39. Stutzer A. What are the Sources of Happiness? // Inspiring Economics. Human Motivation in Political Economy / B. Frey (ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001. P. 135-146.
40. Walsh V. Rationality, Allocation and Reproduction. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.
41. Walsh V. Sen after Putnam // Review of political economy. 2003. Vol. 15, No 3. P. 315-394.
42. Walsh V. Smith after Sen // Review of Political Economy. 2000. Vol. 12, No 1. P. 5–25.
43. Zerbe R. Economic Efficiency in Law and Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
ван Ставерен И. Этика эффективности. Вопросы экономики. 2009;(12):58-71. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-12-58-71
For citation:
van Staveren I. Ethics of Efficiency. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2009;(12):58-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-12-58-71
Просмотров: 510
Послать статью по эл. почте 