|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Pension Reform Modeling and Implicit Pension Debt Evaluation
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-4-113-128
Abstract
The paper reviews major foundations of pension schemes, their classification, prerequisites and reasons for pension reforms. Also the issue of pension reform modeling and analysis of financial consequences of pension scheme restructuring from the government budget point of view are considered. Special attention is paid to the implicit pension debt as the toolbox for estimating future obligations of the government. Main principles of implicit pension debt estimation and short review of its implementation practice are discussed.
References
1. Всемирный банк. Реформа системы пенсионного обеспечения в России: структура и реализация. М.: Весь Мир, 2003.
2. Пенсионная система: модель для России и зарубежный опыт / МОНФ. М., 2003.
3. Aaron H. The Social Insurance Paradox // Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science. 1966. Vol. 32. P. 371-374.
4. Blake D. Does It Matter What Type of Pension Scheme You Have? // The Economic Journal. 2000. Vol. 110, No 461.
5. Boeri T., Boersch-Supan A., Tabellini G. Pension Reforms and the Opinions of European Citizens // American Economic Review. 2002. Vol. 92, No 2.
6. Bos E., Vu M. T., Massiah E., Bulatao R. A. World Population Projections 1994-95: Estimates and Projections with Related Demographic Statistics. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1994.
7. Chand S. K., Jaeger A. Ageing Populations and Public Pension Schemes // Occasional Paper / International Monetary Fund. 1996; Disney R. F. Crises in Public Pension Programmes in OECD: What are the Reform Options? // The Economic Journal. 2000. Vol. 110, No 461.
8. Holzmann R. On the Economic Benefits and Fiscal Requirements of Moving from Unfunded to Funded Pensions // The Welfare State in Europe / M. Buti, D. Franco, L. Pench (eds.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999. P. 139-196.
9. Holzmann R. Toward a Reformed and Coordinated Pension System in Europe:Rationale and Potential Structure. 2003. http://www.euro.centre.org/data/1147858156_4089.pdf.
10. Holzmann R., Palacios R., Zviniene A. Implicit Pension Debt: Issues, Measurement, and Scope in International Perspective. 2004. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2004/10/08/000090341_20041008103424/Rendered/PDF/301530PAPER0SP0403.pdf.
11. Kotlikoff L. J. Simulating the Privatization of Social Security in General Equilibrium // NBER WP. 1996. No 5776.
12. Lindbeck A., Persson M. The Gains from Pension Reform // Journal of Economic Literature. 2003. Vol. 41, No 1. P. 74-112; Hassler J., Lindbeck A. Optimal Actuarial Fairness in Pension Systems: a Note // Economics Letters. 1997. Vol. 55, No 2. P. 251-255.
13. OECD. Ageing in OECD Countries: a Critical Policy Challenge // Social Policy Studies. 1996. No 20.
14. Arrau P. Social Security Reform: the Capital Accumulation and Intergenerational Distribution Effect // World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series. 1990. No 512.
15. Wang Y., Xu D., Wang Z., Zhai F. Options and Impact of China's Pension Reform: a Computable General Equilibrium Analysis // Journal of Comparative Economics. 2004. Vol. 32, No 1. P. 105-127.
Review
For citations:
Volkov Ya. Pension Reform Modeling and Implicit Pension Debt Evaluation. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2009;(4):113-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-4-113-128
Views:
629
Email this article 
