Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Modeling of Firms Innovation Activitywithin the CDM approach
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-51-65
Abstract
Revelation of the factors of corporate innovation activity and measurement of efficiency of innovations are vital topics in studies of modern economy. A character of innovative process has led to an increasing popularity of CDM approach. This allows to analyze the influence of innovative activity on firms economic performance. This paper is a review of the main empirical studies made within the CDM approach.
About the Author
G. Teplykh
National Research University Higher School of Economics (Perm, Russia)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Antonelli C., Colombelli A. (2011). The Generation and Exploitation of Technological Change: Market Value and Total Factor Productivity // The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 36, No 4. P. 353-382.
2. Benavente J. M. (2006). The Role of Research and Innovation in Promoting Productivity in Chile // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 301-315.
3. Blundell R., Griffith R., Reenen J. van (1999). Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms // The Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 66, No 3. P. 529-554.
4. Bond S., Harhoff D., Reenen J. van (2005). Investment, R&D and Financial Constraints in Britain and Germany // Annals of Economics and Statistics. No 79-80. P. 433-460.
5. Chudnovsky D., López A., Pupato G. (2006). Innovation and Productivity in Developing Countries: A Study of Argentine Manufacturing Firms’ Behavior (1992-2001) // Research Policy. Vol. 35, No 2. P. 266-288.
6. Crépon B., Duguet E., Mairesse J. (1998). Research Investment, Innovation and Pro d uctivity : an Econometric Analysis // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 7, No 2. P. 115-158.
7. Damijan J. P., Kostevc Č., Rojec M. (2012). Does innovation help the good or the poor performing firms? // Economics Letters. Vol. 115, No 2. P. 190-195.
8. Duguet E. (2006). Innovation Height, Spillovers and TFP Growth at the Firm Level: Evidence from French Manufacturing // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4-5. P. 415-442.
9. Griffith R., Redding S., Reenen J. van (2004). Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries // Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 86, No 4. P. 883-895.
10. Griffith R., Huergo E., Mairesse J., Peters B. (2006). Innovation and Productivity Across four European Countries // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Vol. 22, No 4. P. 483-498.
11. Griliches Z. (1964). Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function // American Economic Review. Vol. 54, No 6. P. 961-974.
12. Griliches Z. (1979). Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth // Bell Journal of Economics. Vol. 10, No 1. P. 92-116.
13. Griliches Z. (1998). R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Hall B. H., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. (2005). Market Value and Patent Citations // RAND Journal of Economics. Vol. 36, No 1. P. 16-38.
15. Hall B. H., Mairesse J. (2006). Empirical Studies of Innovation in the Knowledge-Driven Economy // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 289-299.
16. Hall B. H. (2011). Innovation and Productivity // NBER Working Papers. No 17178.
17. Heshmati A. (2009). A Generalized Knowledge Production Function // IFCAI University Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 6, No 1. P. 7-39.
18. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M. (1999). International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 8, No 1/2. P. 105-136.
19. Janz N., Lööf H., Peters B. (2004). Innovation and Productivity in German and Swedish Manufacturing Firms: Is there a Common Story? // Problems & Perspectives in Management. No 2. P. 184-204.
20. Jefferson G., Huamao B., Xiaojing G., Xiaoyun Y. (2006). R&D Performance in Chinese Industry // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 345-366.
21. Johansson B., Lööf H. (2008). Innovation Activities Explained by Firm Attributes and L ocation // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 17, No 6. P. 533-552.
22. Koch A., Strotmann H. (2008). Absorptive Capacity and Innovation in the Knowledge Intensive Business Service Sector // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 17, No 6. P. 511-531.
23. Leeuwen G. van, Klomp L. (2006). On the Contribution of Innovation to Multi-factor Productivity Growth // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 367-390.
24. Lööf H., Heshmati A. (2002). Knowledge Capital and Performance Heterogeneity: A Firm-Level Innovation Study // International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 76, No 1. P. 61-85.
25. Lööf H., Heshmati A. (2006). On the Relationship Between Innovation and Performance: A Sensitivity Analysis // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 317-344.
26. Lööf H., Heshmati A., Asplund R., Nääs S. (2003). Innovation and Performance in Manufacturing Industries: A Comparison of the Nordic Countries // ICFAI Journal of Management Research. Vol. 20, No 2. P. 5-36.
27. Mairesse J., Mohnen P. (2002). Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application // The American Economic Review. Vol. 92, No 2. P. 226-230.
28. Mairesse J., Robin S. (2009). Innovation and Productivity: A Firm-level Analysis for French Manufacturing and Services using CIS3 and CIS4 data (1998-2000 and 2002-2004). Paris: CREST-ENSAE.
29. Mansfield E. (1965). Rates of Return from Industrial Research and Development // American Economic Review. Vol. 55, No 1/2. P. 310-322.
30. Mansury M. A., Love J. H. (2008). Innovation, Productivity and Growth in US Business Services: A Firm-level Analysis // Technovation. Vol. 28, No 1/2. P. 52-62.
31. Masso J., Vahter P. (2008). Technological Innovation and Productivity in Late-transition Estonia: Econometric Evidence from Innovation Surveys // The European Journal of Development Research. Vol. 20, No 2. P. 240-261.
32. Minasian J. R. (1969). Research and Development, Production Functions, and Rates of Return // The American Economic Review. Vol. 59, No 2. P. 80-85.
33. Musolesi A., Huiban J. (2010). Innovation and Productivity in Knowledge Intensive Business Services // Journal of Productivity Analysis. Vol. 34, No 1. P. 63-81.
34. Ornaghi C. (2006). Spillovers in Product and Process Innovation: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms // International Journal of Industrial Organization. Vol. 24, No 2. P. 349-380.
35. Pakes A., Griliches Z. (1984). Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look // R&D, Patents, and Productivity / Z. Griliches (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P. 55-72.
36. Parisi M.L., Schiantarelli F., Sembenelli A. (2006). Productivity, Innovation and R&D: Micro Evidence for Italy // European Economic Review. Vol. 50, No 8. P. 2037-2061.
37. Ramania S. V., El Aroui M.A., Carrère M. (2008). On Estimating a Knowledge Production Function at the Firm and Sector Level Using Patent Statistics // Research Policy. Vol. 37, No 9. P. 1568-1578.
38. Raymond W., Mairesse J., Mohnen P., Palm F. (2013). Dynamic Models of R&D, Innovation and Productivity: Panel Data Evidence for Dutch and French Manufacturing // NBER Working Papers. No 19074.
39. Roud V. (20 07). Firm-level Research on Innovation and Productivity: Russian Experience // Proceeding from the Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Countries (MEIDE). UNU-MERIT, Maastricht, Netherlands.
40. Teplykh G. V. (2014). Innovations and Productivity: The Shift During the 2008 Crisis // HSE Working Papers. No WP BRP 23/STI/2014.
41. Vakhitova G., Pavlenko T. (2010). Innovation and Productivity: a Firm Level Study of Ukrainian Manufacturing Sector // Kyiv School of Economics Working Papers. No 27.
42. Wakelin K. (2001). Productivity Growth and R&D Expenditure in UK Manufacturing Firms // Research policy. Vol. 30, No 7. P. 1079-1090.
Review
For citations:
Teplykh G. Modeling of Firms Innovation Activitywithin the CDM approach. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2014;(7):51-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-51-65
Views:
725
Email this article 
