сгенерировать QR код
Открытый доступ
Только для подписчиков
Анализ инновационной деятельности фирм в рамках CDM подхода
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-51-65
Аннотация
Факторы инновационной деятельности компаний и оценка эффективности инноваций остаются актуальными темами исследований современной экономики. Специфика инновационного процесса обусловила рост популярности структурного моделирования в рамках CDM подхода в академических исследованиях. Он позволяет изучать влияние инновационной деятельности компании на ее экономические результаты. В статье проанализированы эмпирические исследования, осуществленные на основе CDM подхода.
Об авторе
Г. В. Теплых
Высшая школа экономики (Пермь)
Россия
младший научный сотрудник Научно-учебной лаборатории междисциплинарных эмпирических исследований, Национальный исследовательский университет Высшая школа экономики (Пермь)
Россия
младший научный сотрудник Научно-учебной лаборатории междисциплинарных эмпирических исследований, Национальный исследовательский университет Высшая школа экономики (Пермь)
Список литературы
1. Antonelli C., Colombelli A. (2011). The Generation and Exploitation of Technological Change: Market Value and Total Factor Productivity // The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 36, No 4. P. 353-382.
2. Benavente J. M. (2006). The Role of Research and Innovation in Promoting Productivity in Chile // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 301-315.
3. Blundell R., Griffith R., Reenen J. van (1999). Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms // The Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 66, No 3. P. 529-554.
4. Bond S., Harhoff D., Reenen J. van (2005). Investment, R&D and Financial Constraints in Britain and Germany // Annals of Economics and Statistics. No 79-80. P. 433-460.
5. Chudnovsky D., López A., Pupato G. (2006). Innovation and Productivity in Developing Countries: A Study of Argentine Manufacturing Firms’ Behavior (1992-2001) // Research Policy. Vol. 35, No 2. P. 266-288.
6. Crépon B., Duguet E., Mairesse J. (1998). Research Investment, Innovation and Pro d uctivity : an Econometric Analysis // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 7, No 2. P. 115-158.
7. Damijan J. P., Kostevc Č., Rojec M. (2012). Does innovation help the good or the poor performing firms? // Economics Letters. Vol. 115, No 2. P. 190-195.
8. Duguet E. (2006). Innovation Height, Spillovers and TFP Growth at the Firm Level: Evidence from French Manufacturing // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4-5. P. 415-442.
9. Griffith R., Redding S., Reenen J. van (2004). Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries // Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 86, No 4. P. 883-895.
10. Griffith R., Huergo E., Mairesse J., Peters B. (2006). Innovation and Productivity Across four European Countries // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Vol. 22, No 4. P. 483-498.
11. Griliches Z. (1964). Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function // American Economic Review. Vol. 54, No 6. P. 961-974.
12. Griliches Z. (1979). Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth // Bell Journal of Economics. Vol. 10, No 1. P. 92-116.
13. Griliches Z. (1998). R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Hall B. H., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. (2005). Market Value and Patent Citations // RAND Journal of Economics. Vol. 36, No 1. P. 16-38.
15. Hall B. H., Mairesse J. (2006). Empirical Studies of Innovation in the Knowledge-Driven Economy // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 289-299.
16. Hall B. H. (2011). Innovation and Productivity // NBER Working Papers. No 17178.
17. Heshmati A. (2009). A Generalized Knowledge Production Function // IFCAI University Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 6, No 1. P. 7-39.
18. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M. (1999). International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 8, No 1/2. P. 105-136.
19. Janz N., Lööf H., Peters B. (2004). Innovation and Productivity in German and Swedish Manufacturing Firms: Is there a Common Story? // Problems & Perspectives in Management. No 2. P. 184-204.
20. Jefferson G., Huamao B., Xiaojing G., Xiaoyun Y. (2006). R&D Performance in Chinese Industry // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 345-366.
21. Johansson B., Lööf H. (2008). Innovation Activities Explained by Firm Attributes and L ocation // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 17, No 6. P. 533-552.
22. Koch A., Strotmann H. (2008). Absorptive Capacity and Innovation in the Knowledge Intensive Business Service Sector // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 17, No 6. P. 511-531.
23. Leeuwen G. van, Klomp L. (2006). On the Contribution of Innovation to Multi-factor Productivity Growth // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 367-390.
24. Lööf H., Heshmati A. (2002). Knowledge Capital and Performance Heterogeneity: A Firm-Level Innovation Study // International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 76, No 1. P. 61-85.
25. Lööf H., Heshmati A. (2006). On the Relationship Between Innovation and Performance: A Sensitivity Analysis // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 15, No 4/5. P. 317-344.
26. Lööf H., Heshmati A., Asplund R., Nääs S. (2003). Innovation and Performance in Manufacturing Industries: A Comparison of the Nordic Countries // ICFAI Journal of Management Research. Vol. 20, No 2. P. 5-36.
27. Mairesse J., Mohnen P. (2002). Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application // The American Economic Review. Vol. 92, No 2. P. 226-230.
28. Mairesse J., Robin S. (2009). Innovation and Productivity: A Firm-level Analysis for French Manufacturing and Services using CIS3 and CIS4 data (1998-2000 and 2002-2004). Paris: CREST-ENSAE.
29. Mansfield E. (1965). Rates of Return from Industrial Research and Development // American Economic Review. Vol. 55, No 1/2. P. 310-322.
30. Mansury M. A., Love J. H. (2008). Innovation, Productivity and Growth in US Business Services: A Firm-level Analysis // Technovation. Vol. 28, No 1/2. P. 52-62.
31. Masso J., Vahter P. (2008). Technological Innovation and Productivity in Late-transition Estonia: Econometric Evidence from Innovation Surveys // The European Journal of Development Research. Vol. 20, No 2. P. 240-261.
32. Minasian J. R. (1969). Research and Development, Production Functions, and Rates of Return // The American Economic Review. Vol. 59, No 2. P. 80-85.
33. Musolesi A., Huiban J. (2010). Innovation and Productivity in Knowledge Intensive Business Services // Journal of Productivity Analysis. Vol. 34, No 1. P. 63-81.
34. Ornaghi C. (2006). Spillovers in Product and Process Innovation: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms // International Journal of Industrial Organization. Vol. 24, No 2. P. 349-380.
35. Pakes A., Griliches Z. (1984). Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look // R&D, Patents, and Productivity / Z. Griliches (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P. 55-72.
36. Parisi M.L., Schiantarelli F., Sembenelli A. (2006). Productivity, Innovation and R&D: Micro Evidence for Italy // European Economic Review. Vol. 50, No 8. P. 2037-2061.
37. Ramania S. V., El Aroui M.A., Carrère M. (2008). On Estimating a Knowledge Production Function at the Firm and Sector Level Using Patent Statistics // Research Policy. Vol. 37, No 9. P. 1568-1578.
38. Raymond W., Mairesse J., Mohnen P., Palm F. (2013). Dynamic Models of R&D, Innovation and Productivity: Panel Data Evidence for Dutch and French Manufacturing // NBER Working Papers. No 19074.
39. Roud V. (20 07). Firm-level Research on Innovation and Productivity: Russian Experience // Proceeding from the Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Countries (MEIDE). UNU-MERIT, Maastricht, Netherlands.
40. Teplykh G. V. (2014). Innovations and Productivity: The Shift During the 2008 Crisis // HSE Working Papers. No WP BRP 23/STI/2014.
41. Vakhitova G., Pavlenko T. (2010). Innovation and Productivity: a Firm Level Study of Ukrainian Manufacturing Sector // Kyiv School of Economics Working Papers. No 27.
42. Wakelin K. (2001). Productivity Growth and R&D Expenditure in UK Manufacturing Firms // Research policy. Vol. 30, No 7. P. 1079-1090.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Теплых Г.В. Анализ инновационной деятельности фирм в рамках CDM подхода. Вопросы экономики. 2014;(7):51-65. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-51-65
For citation:
Teplykh G. Modeling of Firms Innovation Activitywithin the CDM approach. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2014;(7):51-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-51-65
Просмотров:
722
Послать статью по эл. почте 
