Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Incorporating limited rationality into economics

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-5-45-65

Abstract

Harstad and Selten (this forum) raise interesting questions about the relative promise of optimization models and bounded-rationality models in making progress in economics. This article builds from their analysis by indicating the potential for using neoclassical (broadly defined) optimization models to integrate insights from psychology on the limits to rationality into economics. I lay out an approach to making (imperfect and incremental) improvements over previous economic theory by incorporating greater realism while attempting to maintain the breadth of application, the precision of predictions, and the insights of neoclassical theory. I then discuss how many human limits to full rationality are, in fact, well understood in terms of optimization.

Keywords


JEL: B49, D01, D03, D81, D84

About the Author

M. Rabin
University of California, Berkeley (USA)
Russian Federation


References

1. Rabin M. Incorporating Limited Rationality into Economics // Journal of Economic Literature. 2013. Vol. 51, No 2. P. 528-543. Печатается с разрешения автора и Американской экономической ассоциации

2. Acland D., Levy M. (2011). Habit Formation, Naiveté, and Projection Bias in Gym Attendance. Unpublished.

3. Angeletos G.-M., Laibson D., Repetto A., Tobacman J., Weinberg S. (2001). The Hyberbolic Consumption Model: Calibration, Simulation, and Empirical Evaluation // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 15, No 3. P. 47-68.

4. Badger G. J., Bickel W. K., Giordano L. A., Jacobs E. A., Loewenstein G., Marsch L. (2007). Altered States: The Impact of Immediate Craving on the Valuation of Current and Future Opioids // Journal of Health Economics. Vol. 26, No 5. P. 865-876.

5. Barberis N., Huang M. (2009). Preferences with Frames: A New Utility Specification That Allows for the Framing of Risks // Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. Vol. 33, No 8. P. 1555-1576.

6. Barberis N., Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1998). A Model of Investor Sentiment // Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 49, No 3. P. 307-343.

7. Bar-Hillel M., Wagenaar W. A. (1991). The Perception of Randomness // Advances in Applied Mathematics. Vol. 12, No 4. P. 428-454.

8. Bell D. E. (1985). Disappointment in Decision Making under Uncertainty // Operations Research. Vol. 33, No 1. P. 1-27.

9. Benartzi S., Thaler R. H. (1995). Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 110, No 1. P. 73-92.

10. Benjamin D. J., Rabin M., Raymond C. (2012). A Model of Non-belief in the Law of Large Numbers. Unpublished.

11. Bolton G. E. (1991). A Comparative Model of Bargaining: Theory and Evidence // American Economic Review. Vol. 81, No 5. P. 1096-1136.

12. Bolton G. E., Ockenfels A. (2000). ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition // American Economic Review. Vol. 90, No 1. P. 166-193.

13. Busse M. R., Pope D. G., Pope J. C., Silva-Risso J. (2012). Projection Bias in the Car and Housing Markets. Unpublished.

14. Camerer C. F., Babcock L., Loewenstein G., Thaler R. (1997). Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 112, No 2. P. 407-441.

15. Camerer C. F., Ho T.-H., Chong J.-K. (2004). A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 119, No 3. P. 861-898.

16. Chapman L. J., Chapman J. P. (1969). Illusory Correlation as an Obstacle to the Use of Valid Psychodiagnostic Signs // Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Vol. 74, No 3. P. 271-280.

17. Charness G., Rabin M. (2002). Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 117, No 3. P. 817-869.

18. Conlin M., O’Donoghue T., Vogelsang T. J. (2007). Projection Bias in Catalog Orders // American Economic Review. Vol. 97, No 4. P. 1217-1249.

19. Crawford V. P. (2013). Boundedly Rational versus Optimization-Based Models of Strategic Thinking and Learning in Games // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 51, No 2. P. 512-527.

20. Кроуфорд В. (2014). Модели ограниченной рациональности vs. оптимизационные модели стратегического мышления и обучения в играх // Вопросы экономики. № 5. С. 27-44.

21. Crawford V. P., Costa-Gomes M. A., Iriberri N. (2013). Structural Models of Nonequilibrium Strategic Thinking: Theory, Evidence, and Applications // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 51, No 1. P. 5-62.

22. Crawford V. P., Iriberri N. (2007). Level-k Auctions: Can a Nonequilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winner’s Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions? // Econometrica. Vol. 75, No 6. P. 1721-1770.

23. Crawford V. P., Meng J. (2011). New York City Cab Drivers’ Labor Supply Revisited: Reference-Dependent Preferences with Rational-Expectations Targets for Hours and Income // American Economic Review. Vol. 101, No 5. P. 1912-1932.

24. DellaVigna S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 47, No 2. P. 315-372.

25. Делавинья С. (2011). Психология и экономика: результаты эмпирических исследований // Вопросы экономики. № 4. С. 47-77; № 5. С. 56-74; № 6. С. 82-106.

26. DellaVigna S., Malmendier U. (2006). Paying Not to Go to the Gym // American Economic Review. Vol. 96, No 3. P. 694-719.

27. Dufwenberg M., Kirchsteiger G. (2004). A Theory of Sequential Reciprocity // Games and Economic Behavior. Vol. 47, No 2. P. 268-298.

28. Esponda I. (2008). Behavioral Equilibrium in Economies with Adverse Selection // American Economic Review. Vol. 98, No 4. P. 1269-1291.

29. Eyster E., Rabin M. (2005). Cursed Equilibrium // Econometrica. Vol. 73, No 5. P. 1623-1672.

30. Eyster E., Rabin M. (2008). Naïve Herding. Unpublished.

31. Falk A., Fischbacher U. (2006). A Theory of Reciprocity // Games and Economic Behavior. Vol. 54, No 2. P. 293-315.

32. Fehr E., Schmidt K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 114, No 3. P. 817-868.

33. Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. (1989). Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-unique Prior // Journal of Mathematical Economics. Vol. 18, No 2. P. 141-153.

34. Gilovich Th., Vallone R., Tversky A. (1985). The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences // Cognitive Psychology. Vol. 17, No 3. P. 295-314.

35. Grether D. M. (1980). Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The Representativeness Heuristic // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 95, No 3. P. 537-557.

36. Grether D. M. (1992). Testing Bayes Rule and the Representativeness Heuristic: Some Experimental Evidence // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Vol. 17, No 1. P. 31-57.

37. Gul F. (1991). A Theory of Disappointment Aversion // Econometrica. Vol. 59, No 3. P. 667-686.

38. Hamilton D. L., Gifford R. K. (1976). Illusory Correlation in Interpersonal Perception: A Cognitive Basis of Stereotype Judgments // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 12, No 4. P. 392-407.

39. Harless D. W., Camerer C. F. (1994). The Predictive Utility of Generalized Expected Utility Theories // Econometrica. Vol. 62, No 6. P. 1251-1289.

40. Harstad R. M., Selten R. (2013). Bounded-Rationality Models: Tasks to Become Intellectually Competitive // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 51, No 2. P. 496-511.

41. Kahneman D., Lovallo D. (1993). Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking // Management Science. Vol. 39, No 1. P. 17-31.

42. Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1973). On the Psychology of Prediction // Psychological Review. Vol. 80, No 4. P. 237-251.

43. Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk // Econometrica. Vol. 47, No 2. P. 263-292.

44. Kahneman D., Tversky A. (eds.) (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge; N. Y.; Melbourne: Cambridge University Press; N. Y.: Sage.

45. Kőszegi B. (2010). Utility from Anticipation and Personal Equilibrium // Economic Theory. Vol. 44, No 3. P. 415-444.

46. Kőszegi B., Rabin M. (2006). A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 121, No 4. P. 1133-1165.

47. Kőszegi B., Rabin M. (2007). Reference-Dependent Risk Attitudes // American Economic Review. Vol. 97, No 4. P. 1047-1073.

48. Kőszegi B., Rabin M. (2009). Reference-Dependent Consumption Plans // American Economic Review. Vol. 99, No 3. P. 909-936.

49. Laibson D. (1997). Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 112, No 2. P. 443-477.

50. Levy M. R. (2010). An Empirical Analysis of Biases in Cigarette Addiction. Unpublished.

51. Loewenstein G., O’Donoghue T., Rabin M. (2003). Projection Bias in Predicting Future Utility // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 118, No 4. P. 1209-1248.

52. Loomes G., Sugden R. (1986). Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty // Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 53, No 2. P. 271-282.

53. Machina M. J. (1982). ‘Expected Utility’ Analysis without the Independence Axiom // Econometrica. Vol. 50, No 2. P. 277-323.

54. McKelvey R. D., Palfrey T. R. (1996). A Statistical Theory of Equilibrium in Games // Japanese Economic Review. Vol. 47, No 2. P. 186-209.

55. Mullainathan S. (2002). A Memory-Based Model of Bounded Rationality // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 117, No 3. P. 735-774.

56. Newell A., Simon H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. N. Y.: Prentice Hall.

57. O’Donoghue T., Rabin M. (1999). Doing It Now or Later // American Economic Review. Vol. 89, No 1. P. 103-124.

58. O’Donoghue T., Rabin M. (2001). Choice and Procrastination // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 116, No 1. P. 121-160.

59. Prelec D. (1998). The Probability Weighting Function // Econometrica. Vol. 66, No 3. P. 497-527.

60. Rabin M. (1993). Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics // American Economic Review. Vol. 83, No 5. P. 1281-1302.

61. Rabin M. (1998). Psychology and Economics // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 36, No 1. P. 11-46.

62. Rabin M. (2002a). Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 117, No 3. P. 775-816.

63. Rabin M. (2002b). A Perspective on Psychology and Economics // European Economic Review. Vol. 46, No 4-5. P. 657-685.

64. Rabin M. (2013). An Approach to Incorporating Psychology into Economics // American Economic Review. Vol. 103, No 3. P. 617-622.

65. Rabin M., Schrag J. L. (1999). First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 114, No 1. P. 37-82.

66. Rabin M., Vayanos D. (2010). The Gambler’s and Hot-Hand Fallacies: Theory and Applications // Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 77, No 2. P. 730-778.

67. Read D., Loewenstein G., Rabin M. (1999). Choice Bracketing // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. Vol. 19, No 1-3. P. 171-197.

68. Read D., van Leeuwen B. (1998). Predicting Hunger: The Effects of Appetite and Delay on Choice // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 76, No 2. P. 189-205.

69. Simon H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 69, No 1. P. 99-118.

70. Spiegler R. (2011). Bounded Rationality and Industrial Organization. Oxford; N. Y.: Oxford University Press.

71. Stahl D. O., II, Wilson P. W. (1994). Experimental Evidence on Players’ Models of Other Players // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Vol. 25, No 3. P. 309-327.

72. Strotz R. H. (1956). Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization // Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 23, No 3. P. 165-180.

73. Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. Vol. 5, No 4. P. 297-323.


Review

For citations:


Rabin M. Incorporating limited rationality into economics. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2014;(5):45-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-5-45-65

Views: 704


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)