

Поведенческая экономика и «новый» патернализм. Часть II
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-10-28-46
Аннотация
Об авторе
Р. И. КапелюшниковРоссия
д. э. н., главный научный сотрудник ИМЭМО РАН, замдиректора Центра трудовых исследований НИУ ВШЭ (Москва)
Список литературы
1. Хайек Ф. А. (2000). Индивидуализм и экономический порядок. М.: Изограф
2. Berg N., Gigerenzer G. (2010). As-if Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise? // History of Economic Ideas. Vol. 18, No 2. P. 133—166.
3. Boettke P., Caceres W. Z., Martin A. (2013). Error Is Obvious, Coordination Is the Puzzle // Hayek and Behavioral Economics / R. Frantz, R. Leeson (eds.). L.: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Camerer C., Issacharoff S., Loewenstein G., O’Donoghue T., Rabin M. (2003). Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for “Asymmetric Paternalism” // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 151, No 1. P. 1211—1254.
5. Glaeser E. L. (2004). Psychology and the Market // American Economic Review. Vol. 94, No 2. P. 408—413.
6. Grüne-Yanoff T. (2012). Old Wine in New Casks: Libertarian Paternalism Still Violates Liberal Principles // Social Choice and Welfare. Vol. 38, No 4. P. 635—645.
7. Harsanyi J. (1982). Morality and the Theory of Rational Behaviour // Utilitarianism and Beyond / A. Sen, B. Williams (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 39—62.
8. Jolls C., Sunstein C. R. (2006). Debiasing through Law // The Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 35, No 1. P. 199—242.
9. Knetsch J. L. (1989). The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves // American Economic Review. Vol. 79, No 5. P. 1277—1184.
10. Leonard T. C. (2008). Review of “Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness” // Constitutional Political Economy. Vol. 19, No 4. P. 356—360.
11. Levitt S. D., List J. A. (2007). Viewpoint: On the Generalizability of Lab Behavior to the Field // Canadian Journal of Economics. Vol. 40, No 2. P. 347—370.
12. McQuillin B., Sugden R. (2012). Reconciling Normative and Behavioural Economics: The Problem to Be Solved // Social Choice and Welfare. Vol. 38, No 4. P. 553—567.
13. Plott Ch. R., Zeiler K. (2007). Exchange Asymmetries Incorrectly Interpreted as Evidence of Endowment Effect Theory and Prospect Theory? // American Economic Review. Vol. 97, No 4. P. 1449—1466.
14. Plott Ch. R., Zeiler K. (2011). The Willingness to Pay — Willingness to Accept Gap, the “Endowment Effect”, Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Reply // American Economic Review. Vol. 101, No 4. P. 1449—1466.
15. Rizzo M. J., Whitman D. G. (2009). The Knowledge Problem of the New Paternalism // Brigham Young University Law Review. No 4. P. 905—968.
16. Saint-Paul J. (2011). The Tyranny of Utility: Behavioral Social Science and the Role of Paternalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. Sunstein C., Thaler R. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron // University of Chicago Law Review. Vol. 70, No 4. P. 1159—1202.
18. Thaler R. (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice // Marketing Science. Vol. 4, No 1. P. 199—214.
19. Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
20. Waldfogel J. (2005). Does Consumer Irrationality Trump Consumer Sovereignty? // The Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 87, No 4. P. 691—696.
21. Wright D. J., Ginsburg D. H. (2012). Behavioral Law and Economics: Its Origins, Its Fatal Flaws, and Its Implications for Liberty // Northwestern University Law Review. Vol. 106, No 3. P. 1—106.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Капелюшников Р.И. Поведенческая экономика и «новый» патернализм. Часть II. Вопросы экономики. 2013;(10):28-46. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-10-28-46
For citation:
Kapeliushnikov R. Behavioral Economics and New Paternalism (Part II). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2013;(10):28-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-10-28-46