Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Premium for remote employment in the Russian labor market
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, remote employment demonstrated explosive growth in almost all countries, including Russia. Despite a precipitous decline in its utilization in the post-pandemic period, it persists as a significant emerging form of non-standard employment. The present study is the first to provide quantitative estimates of the wage premium for remote work within the context of the Russian labour market. The different mechаnisms that can impact the earnings of remote workers both positively and negatively are considered in detail. The empirical basis of the analysis is the RLMS HSE microdata for 2020—2023. The findings of the study are consistent with the majority of other research conducted in various countries, which indicates that remote workers are paid more than non—remote ones. As econometric analysis indicates, the premium for distance work can reach 25—35%. It is approximately 1,5 times higher for men than for women. The use of advanced analytical methods (Oster procedure, natural experiment methodology) confirms the existence of a wage effect generated by remote employment.
About the Authors
Rostislav I. Kapeliushnikov
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, RAS; HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
Darya I. Zinchenko
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2022). The anatomy of the corona crisis through the lens of the labor market adjustment. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 2, pp. 33—68. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.32609/00428736-2022-2-33-68
2. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2023). The Russian labor market: A statistical portrait against the background of crises (Preprint WP3/2023/02). Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).]
3. Kapeliushnikov R. I., Zinchenko D. I. (2024). Digital forms of employment in the Russian labor market. Part I. Distant employment. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, No. 6, pp. 157—181. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.6.2654
4. Loginov D. M., Lopatina M. V. (2021). Remote employment in the corona-crisis period: The extent of spread and effectiveness of introduction. Population, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 107—121. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2021.24.4.9
5. Lyashok V. Y. (2021). Distance employment: Remote-working mode becomes the norm in a number of professions. Russian Economic Developments, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 63—67. (In Russian).]
6. Angelici M., Profeta P. (2020). Smart-working: Work flexibility without constraints. CESifo Working Paper, No. 8165. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556304
7. Arntz M., Ben Yahmed S., Berlingieri F. (2022). Working from home, hours worked and wages: Heterogeneity by gender and parenthood. Labour Economics, Vol. 76, article 102169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102169
8. Barrero J. M., Bloom N., Davis S. J. (2021). Why working from home will stick. NBER Working Paper, No. 28731. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28731
9. Bartel C. A., Wrzesniewski A., Wiesenfeld B. M. (2012). Knowing where you stand: Physical isolation, perceived respect, and organizational identification among virtual employees. Organization Science, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 743—757. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0661
10. Bélanger F. (1999). Workers’ propensity to telecommute: An empirical study. Information Management, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 139—153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S03787206(98)00091-3
11. Bloom N., Bunn P., Mizen P., Smietanka P., Thwaites G. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on productivity. NBER Working Paper, No. w28233. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28233
12. Bloom N., Han R., Liang J. (2023). How hybrid working from home works out. Center for Economic Performance. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 1925.
13. Bloom N., Liang J., Roberts J., Ying Z. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 130, No. 1, pp. 165—218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
14. Clark B., Chatterjee K., Martin A., Davis A. (2020). How commuting affects subjective wellbeing. Transportation, Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 2777—2805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-09983-9
15. Cortes P., Pan J. (2019). When time binds: Returns to working long hours and the gender wage gap among the highly skilled. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 351—398. https://doi.org/10.1086/700185
16. Delventhal M., Parkhomenko A. (2025). Spatial implications of telecommuting. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3746555
17. De Graaff T., Rietveld P. (2007). Substitution between working at home and out-of-home: The role of ICT and commuting costs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 142—160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.02.005
18. Dutcher E. (2012). The effects of telecommuting on productivity: An experimental examination. The role of dull and creative tasks. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 355—363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.04.009
19. Dutcher E. G., Saral K. J. (2012). Does team telecommuting affect productivity? An experiment. MPRA Paper, No. 41594.
20. Emanuel N., Harrington E. (2024). Working remotely? Selection, treatment, and the market for remote work. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 16. No. 4, pp. 528—559. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20230376
21. Etheridge B., Wang Y., Tang L. (2020). Worker productivity during lockdown and working from home: Evidence from self-reports. University of Essex: Institute for Social and Economic Research. ISER Working Paper, No. 2020—12.
22. Felstead A., Reuschke D. (2020). Homeworking in the UK: Вefore and during the 2020 lockdown. Cardiff: Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research.
23. Flood S. M., Genadek K. R. (2023). Change and continuity in Americans’ work day characteristics, 2019 to 2021. In: D. S. Hamermesh, S. W. Polachek (eds.). Research in labor economics. Time use in economics, Vol. 51. Leeds: Emerald, рр. 219—245. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0147-912120230000051009
24. Gajendran R., Harrison D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, No. 6, pp. 1524—1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
25. Gariety B. S., Shaffer S. (2007). Wage differentials associated with working at home. Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 130, No. 3, pp. 61—67.
26. Glass J. (2004). Blessing or curse? Work-family policies and mother’s wage growth over time. Work and Occupations, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 367—394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888404266364
27. Golden T. D., Veiga J. F., Dino R. N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 93, No. 6, pp. 1412—1421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012722
28. Goldin C. (2014). A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review, Vol. 104, No. 4, pp. 1091—1119. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.4.1091
29. Gupta A., Mittal V., Van Nieuwerburgh S. (2025). Work from home and the office real estate apocalypse. NBER Working Paper, No. 30526. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30526
30. Halvorsen R., Palmquist R. (1980). The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 474—475.
31. Hill E. J., Miller B.C., Weiner S. P., Colihan J. (1998). Influences of the virtual office on aspects of work and work/life balance. Personnel Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 667—683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00256.x
32. Irlacher M., Koch M. (2021). Working from home, wages, and regional inequality in the light of COVID-19. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Vol. 241, No. 3, pp. 373—404. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2020-0030
33. Kitagawa R., Kuroda S., Okudaira H., Owan H. (2021). Working from home: Its effects on productivity and mental health. Covid Economics, No. 74, pp. 142—171.
34. Lee I., Tipoe E. (2021). Changes in the quantity and quality of time use during the COVID-19 lockdowns in the UK: Who is the most affected? PLoS ONE, Vol. 16, No. 11, article e0258917. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258917
35. Leslie L. M., Manchester C. F., Park T.-Y., Mehng S.A. (2012). Flexible work practices: A source of career premiums or penalties? Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 1407—1428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0651
36. Mann S., Holdsworth L. (2003). The psychological impact of teleworking: Stress, emotions and health. New Technology, Work, and Employment, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 196—211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00121
37. Mas A., Pallais A. (2017). Valuing alternative work arrangements. American Economic Review, Vol. 107, No. 12, pp. 3722—3759. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161500
38. Noonan M. C., Glass J. L. (2012). The hard truth about telecommuting. Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 135, No. 6, pp. 38—45.
39. Oakman J., Kinsman N., Stuckey R., Graham M., Weale V. (2020). A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: How do we optimise health? BMC Public Health, Vol. 20, article 1825. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09875-z
40. Oster E. (2019). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 187—204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2016.1227711
41. Pabilonia S. W., Vernon V. (2022). Telework, wages, and time use in the United States. Review of Economics of Household, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 687—734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-022-09601-1
42. Pabilonia S. W., Vernon V. (2023). Who is doing the chores and childcare in dual-earner couples during the COVID-19 era of working from home? Review of Economics of Household, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 519—565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-022-09642-6 Pigini C., Staffolani S. (2019). Teleworkers in Italy: Who are they? Do they make more? International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 265—285. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0154
43. Rosen S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, No. 1, рр. 34—55. https://doi.org/10.1086/260169
44. Rosen S. (1986). The theory of equalizing differences. In: O. C. Ashenfelter, R. Layard (eds.). Handbook of labor economics, Vol. 1. New York: Elsevier, pp. 641—692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(86)01015-5
45. Schroeder C., Warren R. S. (2004). The effect of home-based work on earnings. Mimeo, University of Georgia.
46. Weeden K. A. (2005). Is there a flexiglass ceiling? Flexible work arrangements and wages in the United States. Social Science Research, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 454—482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.04.006
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kapeliushnikov R.I., Zinchenko D.I. Premium for remote employment in the Russian labor market. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2026;(1):99-125. (In Russ.)
Views:
25
JATS XML
Email this article 
