Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
The role of subjective assessments of well-being in changing the consumption structure of Russian households in 2022—2023
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-12-116-133
Abstract
The present study analyses the impact of the 2022—2023 external shock on the consumption structure of Russian households, with a focus on the role of subjective assessments of well-being. The consumption structure of Russian households consists of five categories of expenditure: food at home, out-of-home food, alcohol, non-food goods, and services. Data from the 27th—32nd waves of the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey — HSE University were used as the empirical basis. Based on changes in self-assessments of their financial situation, households are divided into three groups: those whose financial situation has improved, those whose financial situation has remained unchanged, and those whose financial situation has deteriorated. For econometric modelling, a modification of the Engel curve is applied, utilizing models with both fixed and random effects, in addition to the Tobit model. The results show that under the impact of the 2022—2023 external shock, all household groups reduced their spending on non-food goods, which we attribute to a decline in imports and the departure of foreign companies. We found an increase in spending on services, especially among households whose situation has deteriorated, which is attributed to the indexation of tariffs for essential services. With regard to the role of subjective assessments of well-being, all household groups differ in their responses to shocks and their adaptation strategies.
Supporting agencies: This work/article is an output of a research project implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University).
About the Authors
V. A. Voytenkov
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valentin A. Voytenkov
Moscow
O. A. Demidova
HSE University
Olga A. Demidova
Moscow
References
1. Berendeeva E. V., Ratnikova T. A. (2018). Modeling the food embargo impact on the Russian households’ consumption. HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 9—39. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2018-22-1-9-39
2. Vakulenko E. S., Gorskiy D. I., Kondrateva V. P., Trofimenko I. A. (2024). Reproductive intentions of Russians in 2022—2023: The role of subjective factors. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 9, pp. 138—157. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-9-138-157
3. Abebe G. K., Charlebois S., Music J. (2022). Canadian consumers’ dining behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for channel decisions in the foodservice industry. Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 9, pp. 1—21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094893
4. Berdysheva E., Romanova R. (2017). Rethinking prices during an economic crisis: Calculation as a new mode of consumer behaviour in Russia. International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 397—403. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12366
5. Cocco J. F., Gomes F., Lopes P. (2025). Evidence on expectations of household finances. Management Science, Vol. 71, No. 11, pp. 9548—9568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03257
6. Coibion O., Georgarakos D., Gorodnichenko Y., Kenny G., Weber M. (2024). The effect of macroeconomic uncertainty on household spending. American Economic Review, Vol. 114, No. 3, pp. 645—677. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20221167
7. Darnton-Hill I., Cogill B. (2010). Maternal and young child nutrition adversely affected by external shocks such as increasing global food prices. Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 140, No. 1, pp. 162S—169S. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.111682
8. De Agostini P. (2014). The effect of food prices and household income on the British diet. ISER Working Paper Series, No. 2014-10.
9. Dominko M., Verbič M. (2022). The effect of subjective well-being on consumption behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 876—898. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12457
10. Grzywińska-Rąpca M. (2021). Economic welfare and subjective assessments of financial situation of European households. European Research Studies Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2, Part 1, pp. 948—968. https://doi.org/10.35808/ERSJ/2166
11. Khabbazan M. M., Farzanegan M. R. (2016). Household welfare in Iran under banking sanctions: From open economy toward autarchy. In: M. R. Farzanegan, P. Alaedini (eds.). Economic welfare and inequality in Iran: Developments since the revolution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 213—232. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95025-6_9
12. Koch S. (2023). Basic needs (in)security and subjective equivalence scales. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 169, pp. 723—757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03178-7
13. Korhonen I., Simola H., Solanko L. (2018). Sanctions, counter-sanctions and Russia: Effects on economy, trade and finance. BOFIT Policy Brief, No. 4/2018.
14. Kotelnikova Z., Radaev V. (2017). Recomposition and levelling of consumption expenditures across four economic shocks in Russia, 1994—2014. International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 439—448. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12372
15. Kumhof M., Rancière R., Winant P. (2015). Inequality, leverage, and crises. American Economic Review, Vol. 105, No. 3, pp. 1217—1245. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20110683
16. Leser C. E. V. (1963). Forms of Engel functions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 694—703. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909167
17. Mynaříková L., Pošta V. (2023). The effect of consumer confidence and subjective wellbeing on consumers’ spending behavior. Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 24, pp. 429—453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00603-5
18. Natalini D., Bravo G., Newman E. (2020). Fuel riots: Definition, evidence and policy implications for a new type of energy-related conflict. Energy Policy, Vol. 147, article 111885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111885
19. Norvilitis J. M., Szablicki P. B., Wilson S. D. (2003). Factors influencing levels of credit-card debt in college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 935—947. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01932.x
20. Soberon-Ferrer H., Dardis R. (1991). Determinants of household expenditures for services. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 385—397. https://doi.org/10.1086/208565
21. Varlamova J., Larionova N. (2015). Macroeconomic and demographic determinants of household expenditures in OECD countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 24, pp. 727—733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00686-3
22. Xiong J., Tang Z., Zhu Y., Xu K., Yin Y., Xi Y. (2021). Change of consumption behaviours in the pandemic of COVID-19: Examining residents’ consumption expenditure and driving determinants. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 17, article 9209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179209
23. Yen S. T., Jensen H. H. (1996). Determinants of household expenditures on alcohol. Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 48—67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1996.tb00725.x
24. Zubarevich N. V., Safronov S. G. (2019). People and money: Incomes, consumption, and financial behavior of the population of Russian regions in 2000—2017. Regional Research of Russia, Vol. 9, pp. 359—369. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970519040129
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Voytenkov V.A., Demidova O.A. The role of subjective assessments of well-being in changing the consumption structure of Russian households in 2022—2023. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(12):116-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-12-116-133
Views:
8
Email this article 
