Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
The dynamics of tax revenues and the economic cycle in the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-11-5-20
Abstract
This paper aims to estimate the cyclical behavior of tax revenues of the Russian Federation budget system. Such estimates are necessary to analyze its ability to effectively smooth the economic cycle and to ensure the stability of public expenditures financing. We identified the cyclical component of the main types of taxes with the help of the Hodrick—Prescott filter. Cyclical components of tax revenues were used to calculate correlations with the cyclical component of GDP. The results show that the cyclical component of tax revenues includes corporate income tax, value-added tax on goods imported, and oil and gas revenues. The structural part includes personal income tax, value-added tax on goods sold in the Russian Federation, and excise taxes. According to the VAR modeling, taxes of the cyclical part of budget revenues cannot be characterized as automatic stabilizers.
Supporting agencies: The paper was prepared within the framework of the RANEPA state assignment research program
About the Authors
S. G. Sinelnikov-Murylev
Russian Foreign Trade Academy of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation; Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey G. Sinelnikov-Murylev - Dr. Sci. (Econ.), professor, General Researcher, Russian Foreign Trade Academy under the RF Ministry of Economic Development, scientific director, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy.
Moscow
S. G. Belev
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey G. Belev – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher of the Budget Policy Research Laboratory of the Applied Economic Research Institute.
Moscow
E. O. Matveev
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgenii O. Matveev - Researcher of the Budget Policy Research Laboratory of the Applied Economic Research Institute.
Moscow
References
1. Belev S., Vekerle K., Evdokimova A. (2021). The difference in tax evasion amount among various taxpayers’ groups in Russia. Applied Econometrics, Vol. 62, pp. 66—84. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22394/1993-7601-2021-62-66-84
2. Vlasov S., Derugina E. (2018). Fiscal multipliers in Russia. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 2, pp. 104—119. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2018-38-2-5
3. Gimpelson V., Zudina A. (2011). Informal workers in the Russian economy: Who are they and how many? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 10, pp. 53—76. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2011-10-53-76
4. Gimpelson V., Kapeliushnikov R., Roshchin S. (eds.) (2017). The Russian labor market: Trends, institutions, and structural changes. A report by TseTI and LIRT NRU HSE. (In Russian).
5. Zyablitskiy I. (2020). Estimation of fiscal multipliers in the Russian economy. HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 268—294. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2020-24-2-268-294
6. Kudrin A., Knobel A. (2017). Fiscal policy as a source of economic growth. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 10, pp. 5—26. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-10-5-26
7. Kudrin A., Sokolov I., Suchkova O. (2023). Assessing the impact of fiscal rules on the cyclicality of government expenditures. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 5—22. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-5-5-22
8. Sinelnikov-Murylev S., Drobyshevskiy S., Kazakova M. (2014). Decomposition of Russian GDP growth rates in 1999—2014. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, No. 5, pp. 7—37. (In Russian).
9. Sokolov I., Belev S., Suchkova O. (2021). How to ensure fiscal sustainability in Russia? Problemy Prognozirovaniya, No. 4, pp. 66—76. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-187-66-76
10. Aizenman J., Jinjarak Y., Nguyen H., Park D. (2019). Fiscal space and governmentspending and tax-rate cyclicality patterns: A cross-country comparison, 1960—2016. Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 60, pp. 229—252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2019.02.006
11. Alesina A., Campante F., Tabellini G. (2008). Why is fiscal policy often procyclical? Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 1006—1036. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.5.1006
12. Almosova A., Burda M., Voigts S. (2020). Social security contributions and the business cycle. Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 65, No. C, article 103209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2020.103209
13. Bodmer F. (2006). The Swiss debt brake: How it works and what can go wrong. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 142, No. 3, pp. 307—330.
14. Сhagny O., Döpke J. (2001). Measures of the output gap in the Euro-zone: An empirical assessment of selected methods. Kiel Working Paper, No. 1053.
15. Chrysanthakopoulos C., Tagkalakis A. (2023). Fiscal rules and tax policy cyclicality. Economics Letters, Vol. 225, No. C, article 111035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111035
16. Combes J., Minea A., Sow M. (2017). Is fiscal policy always counter(pro-) cyclical? The role of public debt and fiscal rules. Economic Modelling, Vol. 65, pp. 138—146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.05.017
17. Devereux P., Fuest C. (2009). Is the corporation tax an effective automatic stabilizer? National Tax Journal, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 429—437. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2009.3.05
18. Dromel N., Pintus P. (2008). Are progressive income taxes stabilizing? Journal of Public Economic Theory, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 329—349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679779.2008.00365.x
19. Durán-Cabré M., Esteller-Moré A., Salvadori L. (2020). Cyclical tax enforcement. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 58, pp. 1874—1893. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12902
20. Fatás A., Mihov I. (2012). Fiscal policy as a stabilization tool. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 1—68. https://doi.org/10.1515/1935-1690.113
21. Granda-Carvajal C., García-Callejas D. (2023). Informality, tax policy and the business cycle: Еxploring the links. International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 30, pp. 114—166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-021-09717-7
22. Heimberger P. (2023). The cyclical behavior of fiscal policy: A meta-analysis. Economic Modelling, Vol. 123, article 106259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106259
23. Hodrick R., Prescott E. (1997). Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1—16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953682
24. Ilzetzki E., Mendoza E., Végh C. (2013). How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers? Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 60, pp. 239—254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011
25. João T. (2018). Fiscal rules and fiscal counter-cyclicality. Economics Letters, Vol. 170, pp. 159—162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.06.020
26. Kalman E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 35—45. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552
27. King G., Rebelo T. (1999). Resuscitating real business cycles. In: J. B. Taylor, M. Woodford (eds.). Handbook of macroeconomics, Vol. 1, Part B. Amsterdam and New York: North-Holland, pp. 927—1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S15740048(99)10022-3
28. Ladiray D., Mazzi L., Sartori F. (2003). Statistical methods for potential output estimation and cycle extraction. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
29. Ramey V. (2019). Ten years after the financial crisis: What have we learned from the Renaissance in fiscal research? Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 89—114. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.89
30. Riera-Crichton D., Végh C., Vuletin G. (2016). Tax multipliers: Pitfalls in measurement and identification. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 79, pp. 30—48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.03.003
31. Romer D., Romer H. (2010). The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. American Economic Review, Vol. 100, No. 3, pp. 763—801. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.763
32. Talvi E., Végh C. (2005). Tax base variability and procyclicality of fiscal policy. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 156—190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.07.002
33. Taylor J. (2000). Reassessing discretionary fiscal policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 21—36. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.21
34. Végh C., Vuletin G. (2015). How is tax policy conducted over the business cycle? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 327—370. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20120218
35. Veld J., Larch M., Vandeweyer M. (2013). Automatic fiscal stabilisers: What they are and what they do. Open Economies Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 147—163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-012-9260-6
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Sinelnikov-Murylev S.G., Belev S.G., Matveev E.O. The dynamics of tax revenues and the economic cycle in the Russian Federation. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(11):5-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-11-5-20
Views:
29
Email this article 
