Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Federal policy of equalizing regional budget revenues: Areas for improvement
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-12-134-153
Abstract
The study identifies current issues and presents the areas for improving the federal equalization system in Russia. The effectiveness of equalization transfers determines the possibilities of achieving public policy goals, including national development goals. Long-term trends in interregional differentiation by the level of fiscal capacity of Russian regions have been identified. The low volume of equalizing transfers has been illustrated, taking into account price dynamics and the previous rules for calculating the total volume of transfers. The criteria for the effectiveness of intergovernmental equalization are formulated. The disadvantages of the federal policy have been identified. They are expressed in the violation of each of the four rules: (1) the stability of the methodology; maintaining ranks of the regions; (3) following only objective indicators; (4) priority of equalizing over stimulating. The identified shortcomings not only complicate the equalization, but also make it less transparent and predictable. Therefore, it is too early to speak of an effective federal intergovernmental equalization in Russia. The current policy of equalization is successful in reducing the gap between regions in terms of budget revenues compared to the situation before the equalization. However, further reduction of the gap will require not only an increase in the total amount of transfers, but also a correction of the identified shortcomings while maintaining the advantages achieved. This will improve the effectiveness of intergovernmental regulation and prospects of achieving the goals of public policy.
Keywords
interregional disparity,
intergovernmental regulation,
fiscal capacity,
equalization transfer,
subsidization,
model budget
JEL: H77
Supporting agencies: The paper was prepared based on the results of research carried out within the RANEPA state assignment
About the Author
E. N. Timushev
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration;
Institute of Socio-Economic and Energy Problems of the North, Komi Science Center, Ural Branch of
the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeny N. Timushev
Moscow; Syktyvkar
References
1. Arlashkin I. Y. (2020). Comparative assessment of approaches to calculating the tax potential of regions. Financial Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 58—67. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2020-1-58-67
2. Afanasyev R. S., Bogdanov L. N., Gulidov R. V., Leonov S. N. (2019). “Model” budgets: Consequences for the subjects of the Russian Federation. Spatial Economics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 132—156. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.1.132-156
3. Bukharsky V. V., Lavrov A. M. (2017). Impact evaluation of the equalizing and stimulating effects of intergovernmental transfers to the subjects of the Russian Federation. Financial Journal, No. 1, pp. 9—21. (In Russian).
4. Valieva D. G. (2011). Intergovernmental transfers and politics of regional authorities under the condition of a large grant amount to sub-national government. Public Administration Issues, No. 4, pp. 50—62. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2011-0-4- 50-62
5. Deryugin A. N. (2016). Regional alignment: Are there still incentives for development? Ekonomicheskaya Politika, No. 6, pp. 170—191. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2016-6-08
6. Deryugin A. N., Sokolov I. A. (2019). Prospects for the use of the “model budget” in the distribution of equalization grants in Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 21—38. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-4-21-38
7. Zemlyansky D. Y., Medvednikova D. M., Kalinovsky L. V., Prusikhin O. E. (2024). Distribution of equalization grants across the subjects of the Russian Federation and their role in changing interregional budget inequality. Regional Research, No. 2, pp. 4—17. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2024-2-1
8. Zolotareva A. B. (2020). Problems of concluding agreements on granting subsidies to the subjects of the Russian Federation. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 90—111. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2020-5-90-111
9. Klimanov V., Lavrov A. (2004). Intergovernmental fiscal relations in Russia in the present time. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 111—125. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042- 8736-2004-11-111-125
10. Klimanov V. V., Safina A. I., Timushev E. N. (2018). The impact of the introduction of a “model” budget on the budgetary security of the regions of the Far East. Ekonomika Vostoka Rossii, No. 2, pp. 5—18. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25801/SRC.2019.10.2.001
11. Klimanov V. V., Timushev E. N. (2024). The possibilities of reducing the gap in the level of budgetary security of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Finansy, No. 10, pp. 8—17. (In Russian).
12. Lavrov A. M. (2019). Logic and prospects of budget reforms in Russia: In search of “optimal decentralization”. A cycle of publications and documents (1998—2019). Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-1992-9
13. Lavrovsky B. L., Goryushkina E. A. (2021). Budgetary federalism in Russia: To be or not to be? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 143—160. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-143-160
14. Mamedov A. A. et al. (2012). Issues of interbudgetary relations in Russia. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).
15. Milchakov M. V. (2017). Highly subsidized regions of Russia: Conditions for budget formation and mechanisms of state support. Financial Journal, No. 1, pp. 22—38. (In Russian).
16. Milchakov M. V. (2024). Fiscal and financial situation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation: Medium-term trends in the regional context. Financial Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 104—125. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2024-2-104-125
17. Myslyaeva I. N., Naumenko T. V. (2017). Inter-budgetary relations in the system of state regional policy measures. Region: Economics and Sociology, No. 4, pp. 62—76. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20170403
18. Nazarov V. (2013). International experience in the evolution of equalization transfer allocation methods. Moscow: RANEPA. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2264208
19. Nazarov V., Trunin I. (2006). Inter-budgetary relations and subnational finance. In: Russian economy in 2005: Trends and outlooks, Iss. 27. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ., pp. 120—153. (In Russian).
20. Nogovitsyn R. R., Sofronova T. S., Potravnaya E. V. (2023). Assessment of the budgetary security of the Arctic regions in order to equalize incomes and improve the welfare of the population. Problemy Prognozirovaniya, No. 5, pp. 136—149. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-200-136-149
21. Siluanov A. G. (2023). The Budget Code adapts in a timely manner to systemic changes in the economy. Byudzhet, No. 7, pp. 14—19. (In Russian).
22. Sumskaya T. V. (2024). Analysis of the federal transfer policy in Russia. Problemy Prognozirovaniya, No. 5, pp. 176—190. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-206-176-190
23. Tashtamirov M. R. (2022). Efficiency of interbudgetary regulation of heavily subsidized budgets at the subnational level. Finance: Theory and Practice, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 136—159. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-2-136-159
24. Timushev E. N. (2024). Distribution of federal equalization grants: Assessing the impact of major changes. Financial Journal, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 78—96. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2024-5-78-96
25. Figuieres C., Hindriks J., Myles G. D. (2004). Revenue sharing versus expenditure sharing in a federal system. International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 155—174. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITAX.0000011398.14064.c4
26. Shah A. (2007). A practitioner’s guide to intergovernmental fiscal transfers. In: R. W. Boadway, A. M. Shah (eds.). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: Principles and practice. Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 1—53.
27. Spahn P. B. (2007). Equity and efficiency aspects of interagency transfers in a multigovernment framework. In: R. W. Boadway, A. M. Shah (eds.). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: Principles and practice. Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 75—106.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Timushev E.N. Federal policy of equalizing regional budget revenues: Areas for improvement. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(12):134-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-12-134-153
Views:
14
Email this article 
