|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Mortgage and reproductive intentions: A boost or a barrier?
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-6-137-153
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between reproductive intentions and mortgage debt among the Russian population. Using data from the “Person, family, society” telephone survey conducted in spring 2020, we estimate binary choice probit models employing instrumental variables (IV) to address potential endogeneity between the variables under consideration. An instrument for mortgage status was constructed using respondents’ attitudes toward mortgage loans. Statistical tests confirmed the validity and relevance of the chosen instrument for the main model and most subgroups. Results modeling the intention to have a child within the next three years indicate a positive correlation between mortgage debt and reproductive intentions, consistent with findings from other countries. Robustness checks were performed on subgroups stratified by number of children, gender, and age. The positive association between mortgage debt and reproductive intentions was found to hold for women, respondents under 36 years of age, and childless respondents; for other groups, mortgage debt proved to be an insignificant factor.
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared within the framework of the HSE University Basic Research Program.
About the Authors
E. S. Vakulenko
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena S. Vakulenko
Moscow
R. Y. Evgrafova
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Rufina Y. Evgrafova
Moscow
References
1. Bystrov A. A. (2008). Maternity capital: Stimulating fertility? Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, No. 12, pp. 91—96. (In Russian).
2. Vakulenko E. S., Gorskiy D. I., Kondrateva V. P., Trofimenko I. A. (2024). Reproductive intentions of Russians in 2022—2023: Тhe role of subjective factors. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 9, pp. 138—157. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-9-138-157
3. Vakulenko E. S., Ivashina N. V., Svistyilnik Y. O. (2023a). Regional maternity capital programmes: Impact on fertility in Russia. Economy of Regions, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 1077—1092. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-4-10
4. Vakulenko E. S., Mitrofanova E. S., Gorskiy D. I. (2023b). Reproductive intentions of Russians with children at the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 85—102. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-4-85-102
5. Vyrskaya M., Makarentseva A. (2018). Methodical presentation of the All-Russian survey “Man, family, society”. (In Russian).
6. Zhirnov G. A. (2025). Mass subsidized mortgage: No extension, no termination? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 115—133. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-1-115-133
7. Zhuravleva T. L., Gavrilova Y. A. (2007). Analysis of fertility determinants in Russia: What do RLMS data say? HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 145—182. (In Russian).
8. Kazenin K. I., Kozlov V. A. (2016). Rejuvenation of the motherhood in Dagestan: A tendency or an artefact? (The preliminary results of the rural population survey). Demographic Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 100—123. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v3i3.1748
9. Makarentseva A. O., Biryukova S. S. (2023). Factors, consistency, and realization of reproductive intentions in Russia. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, No. 2, pp. 31—56. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring. 2023.2.2379
10. Maleva T. M., Sinyavskaya O. V. (2006). Socio-economic factors of fertility in Russia: Empirical measurements and challenges to social policy. SPERO. Social Policy: Expertise. Recommendations. Reviews, No. 5, pp. 70—97. (In Russian).
11. Maleva T. M., Tyndik A. O. (2013). Fertility growth potential in Russia: Lessons of the megalopolis. Journal of the New Economic Association, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 137-158. (In Russian).
12. Rogozin D., Makarentseva A., Kartseva M., Galieva N., Manuilskaya K., Burdyak A., Grishina E. (2021). Man, family, society 2020-21: [A database. Moscow: RANEPA. (In Russian).
13. Sinyavskaya O. V., Tyndik A. O. (2009). Fertility in contemporary Russia: From plans to actions? Parents and children, men and women in the family and society, Iss. 2. Moscow: NISP, pp. 9—44. (In Russian).
14. Amuedo-Dorantes C., Kimmel J. (2005). The motherhood wage gap for women in the United States: The importance of college and fertility delay. Review of Economics of the Household, Vol. 3, pp. 17—48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-004-0978-9
15. Balbo N., Francesco B. C., Mills M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population, Vol. 29, pp. 1—38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y
16. Becker G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In: NBER. Demographic and economic change in developed countries. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 209—240.
17. Becker G. S., Lewis H. G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 2, Part 2, pp. 279—288. https://doi.org/10.1086/260166
18. Branten E. (2022). The role of risk attitudes and expectations in household borrowing: Еvidence from Estonia. Baltic Journal of Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 126—145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2022.2112485
19. Brown S., Garino G., Taylor K. (2013). Household debt and attitudes toward risk. Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 283—304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2012.00506.x
20. Cooke L. P. (2009). Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 123—140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279408002584
21. Cumming F., Dettling L. (2024). Monetary policy and birth rates: The effect of mortgage rate pass-through on fertility. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 91, No. 1, pp. 229—258. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad034
22. Doepke M., Hannusch A., Kindermann F., Tertilt M. (2023). The economics of fertility: A new era. In: Handbook of the economics of the family, Vol. 1, Iss. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 151—254. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hefam.2023.01.003
23. Goldin C. (2024). Babies and the macroeconomy. NBER Working Paper, No. 33311. https://doi.org/10.3386/w33311
24. Gorskiy D. (2024). The maternity capital programs in Russia and the second birth spacing. Applied Econometrics, Vol. 75, pp. 117—141. https://doi.org/10.22394/1993-7601-2024-75-117-141
25. Gurov I. N., Kulikova E. Y. (2022). Fertility—Household credit burden nexus at the present stage. Population and Economics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 36-61. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.6.e76066
26. Hacamo I. (2021). The babies of mortgage market deregulation. Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 907—948. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa073
27. Kneale D., Joshi H. (2008). Postponement and childlessness: Evidence from two British cohorts. Demographic Research, Vol. 19, pp. 1935—1968. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.58
28. Meissner T., Gassmann X., Faure C., Schleich J. (2023). Individual characteristics associated with risk and time preferences: A multi country representative survey. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 66, pp. 77—107. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11166-022-09383-y
29. Nau M., Dwyer R. E., Hodson R. (2015). Can’t afford a baby? Debt and young Americans. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Vol. 42, pp. 114—122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.05.003
30. Slonimczyk F., Yurko A. (2014). Assessing the impact of the maternity capital policy in Russia. Labour Economics, Vol. 30, pp. 265—281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2014.03.004
31. Sorvachev I., Yakovlev E. (2020). Short-and long-run effects of a sizable child subsidy: Evidence from Russia. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 13019.
32. Yang X. (2023). More credit, more babies? Bank credit expansion, house prices, and fertility. Available at SRRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4473936
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Vakulenko E.S., Evgrafova R.Y. Mortgage and reproductive intentions: A boost or a barrier? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(6):137-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-6-137-153
Views:
170
Email this article 
