|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Combining household survey and tax data for measuring income inequality in Russia
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-3-97-114
Abstract
The paper presents an approach to better account of the top-income groups in measuring income inequality in Russia. There has been a number of suggested approaches to deal with this problem using household income surveys, administrative sources — mainly tax data, and also combination of different data sources. In this paper, we present a solution based on combining of microdata of the Statistical Survey of Income and Participation in Social Programs (SSIPSP) and tax data. In experimental calculations we use tax data to correct income from paid employment as the most significant source of livelihood for the most of the population. The results of the correction are extended on the household and per capita income. The study has shown that the adjustment of the distribution of income with use of tax data occurs in the group with very high income representing less than 2% of the population. Applying correction at the microdata level makes it possible to obtain more complete estimates of income inequality not only for the population as a whole, but also for some social strata.
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared as part of scientific project No. 171 “Economic behavior of households, 2024” of HSE University
About the Authors
S. S. Kuzin
HSE University; JSC Trinity Solutions
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. Y. Surinov
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Velikanova T. B., Kolmakov I. B., Frolova E. B. (1996). Improving methods and models of distribution of population by mean per capita income. Voprosy Statistiki, No. 5, pp. 50—58. (In Russian).
2. Kolmakov I. В. (2015). Conjugation of the lognormal distribution of the population by monetary income with the Pareto distribution. Audit i Finansovyi Analiz, No. 2, pp. 124—131. (In Russian).
3. Migranova L. А., Zharomsky V. S. (2020). Methods of estimating the level and differentiation of population income. Population, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 26—39. (In Russian).https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2020.23.4.3
4. Suvorov A. V. (2008). Problems of assessing income differentiation in modern Russia. Problemy Prognozirovaniya, No. 2, pp. 3—19. (In Russian).
5. Atkinson A. B. (2017). Pareto and the upper tail of the income distribution in the UK: 1799 to the present. Economica, Vol. 84, No. 334, pp. 129—156. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12214
6. Atkinson A. B., Piketty T., Saez E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 3—71. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.1.3
7. Bach S., Bartels C., Neef T. (2022). Distributional national accounts: A macro-micro approach to inequality in Germany. In: R. Chetty, J. N. Friedman, J. C. Gornick, B. Johnson, A. Kennickell (eds.). Measuring distribution and mobility of income and wealth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 625—640.
8. Blanchet T., Chancel L., Flores I., Morgan M. (2024). Distributional national accounts guidelines: Methods and concepts used in the world inequality database. World Inequality Lab.
9. Bricker J., Henriques A. M., Krimmel J. A., Sabelhaus J. E. (2016). Measuring income and wealth at the top using administrative and survey data. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 261—312. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2016.0016
10. Hajargasht G., Griffiths W. E. (2013). Pareto—lognormal distributions: Inequality, poverty, and estimation from grouped income data. Economic Modelling, Vol. 33, pp. 593—604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.046
11. Jenkins S. P. (2016). Taking better account of top incomes when measuring inequality levels and trends. Paper presented at the 2nd Meeting of Providers of OECD Income Distribution Data, Paris, February 19. https://web-archive.oecd.org/2016-02-19/388193-Session4-4-Top-Incomes-Jenkins.pdf
12. Jenkins S. P. (2017). Pareto models, top incomes and recent trends in UK income inequality. Economica, Vol. 84, No. 334, pp. 261—289. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12217
13. Jenkins S. P. (2022). Top-income adjustments and official statistics on income distribution: Тhe case of the UK. Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 20, pp. 151—168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-022-09532-y
14. Little R. J., Rubin D. B. (2014). Statistical analysis with missing data. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Lustig N. (2020). The “missing rich” in household surveys: Causes and correction approaches. Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequalityworking Paper Series, No. 8. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/j23pn
16. Majid M. H. A., Ibrahim K., Masseran N. (2023). Three-part composite Pareto modelling for income distribution in Malaysia. Mathematics, Vol. 11, No. 13, article 2899. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11132899
17. Oancea B., Andrei T., Pirjol D. (2017). Income inequality in Romania: The exponentialPareto distribution. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 469, No. 1, pp. 486—498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.094
18. Piketty T., Saez E., Zucman G. (2018). Distributional National Accounts: Methods and еstimates for the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 133, No. 2, pp. 553—609. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx043
19. Schield M. (2021). Statistical literacy and the lognormal distribution. Proceedings of 63rd ISI World Statistics Congress, July 11—16.
20. UNECE (2011). Canberra group handbook on household income statistics. 2nd ed. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
21. Webber D., Tonkin R. P., Shine M. (2020). Using tax data to better capture top incomes in official UK income inequality statistics. Working Рaper, No. 27582. https:// doi.org/10.3386/w27582
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kuzin S.S., Surinov A.Y. Combining household survey and tax data for measuring income inequality in Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(3):97-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-3-97-114
Views:
709
Email this article 
