сгенерировать QR код
Открытый доступ
Только для подписчиков
Экономическая идеология: варианты пониманий и применения понятия
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-10-5-27
Аннотация
Экономика — одна из базовых систем существования человечества, а экономические понятия используются в разных науках, порой в неожиданных сочетаниях. Одним из таких является понятие экономической идеологии, используемое достаточно давно, но наиболее широко в последние десятилетия, причем в различных значениях. При этом собственно экономические его исследования встречаются редко, так что фактически оно применяется в политической науке, социологии и психологии. Проанализированы основные практики использования понятия экономической идеологии и предложен способ их упорядочения, или типология, исходя из которой можно выделить направления экономического анализа данного понятия. Такие исследования способствовали бы изучению воздействия субъективной информации, в частности убеждений, на принятие экономических решений.
Об авторе
В. Л. Тамбовцев
Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова
Россия
Россия
Тамбовцев Виталий Леонидович - д. э. н., проф., гл. н. с. лаборатории институционального анализа экономического факультета МГУ.
Москва
Список литературы
1. Агапова И. И. (2002). Экономика и этика: аспекты взаимодействия. М.: Юристъ.
2. Ананьин О. И. (2013). Экономические онтологии и экономические институты // Федерализм. № 1. С. 75—100.
3. Вольчик В. В., Корытцев М. А., Маслюкова Е. В. (2019). Институты и идеология менеджеризма в сфере высшего образования и науки // Управленец. Т. 10, № 6. С. 15—27. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2019-10-6-2
4. Вольчик В. В., Маслюкова Е. В. (2021). Возможности нарративной экономики в исследованиях российской инновационной системы // Terra Economicus. Т. 19, № 4. С. 36—50. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2021-19-4-36-50
5. Журавлев А. Л, Купрейченко А. Б. (2003). Нравственно-психологическая регуляция экономической активности. М.: Изд-во Института психологии РАН.
6. Захарова А. Н. (2012). Экономический менталитет в структуре российской полиментальности: анализ научной категории // Вестник Чувашского государственного педагогического университета им. И. Я. Яковлева. № 3. С. 74—81.
7. Орехов А. М., Ахмедов Ф. Н. (2013). Экономическая идеология: опыт интерпретации // Социум и власть. № 6. С. 90—95.
8. Самсин А. И. (2003). Основы философии экономики. М.: Юнити. [Samsin A. I. (2003). Basic philosophy of economics. Moscow: Unity. (In Russian).]
9. Тамбовцев В. Л. (2024). Институциональный анализ экономики: качественные и количественные исследования и методы // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 2. С. 45—55. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2024_2_45_55
10. Тамбовцев В. Л., Бузулукова Е. В., Валитова Л. А., Дэн Ц., Ситкевич Д. А., Турабаева А. М. (2023). Методология нарративного анализа в экономике: случай предпринимательских сетей // Вопросы экономики. № 7. С. 81—99. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-81-99
11. Andre P., Pizzinelli C., Roth C., Wohlfart J. (2022). Subjective models of the macroeconomy: Evidence from experts and representative samples. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 89, No. 6, pp. 2958—2991. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdac008
12. Angel R., Gronfein W. (1988). The use of subjective information in statistical models. American Sociological Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 464—473. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095653
13. Angrisani M., Samek A., Serrano-Padial R. (2024). Competing narratives in action: An empirical analysis of model adoption dynamics. NBER Working Paper, No. 32242. https://doi.org/10.3386/w32242
14. Ardalan K. (2018). Behavioral attitudes toward current economic events: А lesson from neuroeconomics. Business Economics, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 202—208. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-018-0089-x
15. Arena R., Festré A. (2006). Knowledge and beliefs in economics: The case of the Austrian tradition. In: R. Arena, A. Festré (еds.). Knowledge, beliefs and economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 35—58. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201539
16. Arthur W. B. (2005). Cognition: The black box of economics. In: L. Booker, S. Forrest, M. Mitchell, R. Riolo (еds.). Perspectives on adaptation in natural and artificial systems. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 291—301.
17. Arthur W. B. (2021). Foundations of complexity economics. Nature Reviews Physics, Vol. 3, pp. 136—145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00273-3
18. Bakker B. N. (2017). Personality traits, income, and economic ideology. Political Psychology, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1025—1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12349
19. Barbaglia L., Consoli S., Manzan S. (2024). Forecasting GDP in Europe with textual data. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 338—355. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3027
20. Beyer K. M., Pühringer S. (2022). Divided we stand? On the political engagement of U.S. economists. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 883—903. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2022.2093581
21. Bouchon-Meunier B., Lesot M.-J., Marsala С. (2013). Modelling and management of subjective information in a fuzzy setting. International Journal of General Systems, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 3—19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2012.710435
22. Bourgine P., Nadal J.-P. (еds.) (2004). Cognitive economics: An interdisciplinary approach. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24708-1
23. Boyer P., Petersen M. (2018). Folk-economic beliefs: An evolutionary cognitive model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 41, article e158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001960
24. Braunstein E., Van Staveren I., Tavani D. (2011). Embedding care and unpaid work in macroeconomic modeling: A structuralist approach. Feminist Economics, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 5—31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.602354
25. Brunner K., Meckling W. (1977). The perception of man and the conception of government. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 9, No. 1, Part 1, pp. 70—85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1992000
26. Camerer С. F. (2008). The potential of neuroeconomics. Economics & Philosophy, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 369—379. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267108002022
27. Camerer C., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 9—64. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051053737843
28. Careja R., Harris E. (2022). Thirty years of welfare chauvinism research: Findings and challenges. Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 212—224. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287211068796
29. Carter J. R., Irons M. D. (1991). Are economists different, and if so, why? Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 171—177. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.2.171
30. Carvalho J.-P., Bergeron A., Henrich J., Nunn N., Weigel J. (2023). Zero-sum environments, the evolution of effort-suppressing beliefs, and economic development. NBER Working Paper, No. W31663. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31663
31. Chueri J. (2022). An emerging populist welfare paradigm? How populist radical right-wing parties are reshaping the welfare state. Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 383—409. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12230
32. Claus E., Dedewanou F. A. (2024). Expectations, beliefs, and perceptions in the modern economy: An overview. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 297—302. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12610
33. Clift B., Woll С. (2012). Economic patriotism: Reinventing control over open markets. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 307—323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.638117
34. Colander D. (2013). On the ideological migration of the economics laureates. Econ Journal Watch, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 240—254.
35. Costello T. H., Lilienfeld S. O. (2021). Social and economic political ideology consistently operate as mutual suppressors: Implications for personality, social, and political psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 1425—1436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620964679
36. Cuervo-Cazurra A., Inkpen A., Musacchio A., Ramaswamy K. (2014). Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 45, No. 8, pp. 919—942. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.43
37. D’Acunto F., Weber M. (2024). Why survey-based subjective expectations are meaningful and important. Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 16, pp. 329—357. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-091523-043659
38. Denzau A., North D. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 3—31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x
39. Dugger W. M. (1996). Redefining economics: From market allocation to social provisioning. In: С. J. Whalen, H. P. Minsky (еds.). Political economy for the 21st century. New York: Routledge, pp. 31—43.
40. Dumont L. (1977). From Mandeville to Marx: The genesis and triumph of economic ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Forstmann M., Burgmer P. (2018). The mind of the market: Lay beliefs about the economy as a willful, goal-oriented agent. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 41, article e169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18000353
42. Friedman M. (1953). The methodology of positive economies. In: M. Friedman. Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3—43. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581427.002
43. Furnham A. (1985). A short measure of economic beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 123—126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90038-8
44. Furnham A. (1987). The structure of economic beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 253—260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(87)90181-4
45. Furqani H. (2018). Worldview and the construction of economics secular and Islamic tradition. Tsaqafah: Jurnal Peradaban Islam, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 1—24. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v14i1.2294
46. Galbraith J. K. (1970). Economics as a system of belief. American Economic Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 469—478.
47. Gerring J. (1997). Ideology: А definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 957—994. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299705000412
48. Gruchy A. G. (1987). The reconstruction of economics: An analysis of the fundamentals of institutional economics. New York: Greenwood Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216006039
49. Haughney D. (2006). Neoliberal economics, democratic transition, and Mapuche demands for rights in Chile. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
50. Hayek F. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, New Series, Vol. 4, No. 13, pp. 33—54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548786
51. Hayek F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 519—530.
52. Heilbroner R. (1990). Economics as ideology. In: W. J. Samuels (еd.). Economics as discourse. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 101—128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1377-1_4
53. Hibbing J. R., Smith K. B., Alford J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 297—307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192
54. Hill R. (2000). The case of the missing organizations: Сo-operatives and the textbooks. Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 281—295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596786
55. Hindriks F. A. (2005). Unobservability, tractability and the battle of assumptions, Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 383—406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780500223619
56. Hodgson G. M. (1998). The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 166—192.
57. Hodgson G. M. (2019). Is there a future for heterodox economics? Institutions, ideology and a scientific community. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
58. Hodgson G. M. (2021). Debating the future of heterodox economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 603—614. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2021.1945874
59. Jedinger A., Burger A. M. (2021). Do smarter people have more conservative economic attitudes? Assessing the relationship between cognitive ability and economic ideology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 48, No. 11, pp. 1548—1565. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211046808
60. Jelveh Z., Kogut B., Naidu S. (2024). Political language in economics. Economic Journal. Vol. 134, No. 662, pp. 2439—2469. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae026
61. Jo T.-H., Todorova Z. (2018). Social provisioning process: A heterodox view of the economy. In: T.-H. Jo, L. Chester, С. D’Ippoliti (еds.). The Routledge handbook of heterodox economics: Theorizing, analyzing, and transforming capitalism. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 29—40. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315707587-2
62. Jost J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, Vol. 61, No. 7, pp. 651—670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651
63. Kalmi P. (2007). The disappearance of cooperatives from economics textbooks. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 625—647. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bem005
64. Katouzian H. (1980). Ideology and method in economics. New York: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16256-7
65. Kendall С. W., Charles С. (2022). Causal narratives. NBER Working Paper, No. 30346. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30346
66. Kennedy E. (1979). “Ideology” from Destutt De Tracy to Marx. Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 353—368. https://doi.org/10.2307/2709242
67. Klein D. B. (2013). The ideological migration of the economics laureates: Introduction and overview. Econ Journal Watch, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 218—239.
68. Klein D. B., Stern С. (2006). Economists’ policy views and voting. Public Choice, Vol. 126, No. 3/4, pp. 331—342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-7509-6
69. Kurzban R., Duckworth A., Kable J. W., Myers J. (2013). An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 661—726. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003196
70. Lau L., Frey B. (1971). Ideology, public approval, and government behavior. Public Choice, Vol. 10, No. 1 pp. 21—40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718620
71. Lavoie M. (2020). Heterodox economics as seen by Geoffrey Hodgson: Аn assessment. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 9—18. https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2020.01.02
72. Lawson T. (2006). The nature of heterodox economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 483—505. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei093
73. Lawson T. (2012). Mathematical modelling and ideology in the economics academy: Сompeting explanations of the failings of the modern discipline? Economic Thought, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3—22.
74. Lee F. (2005). Teaching heterodox microeconomics. Post Autistic Economics Review, No. 31, article 3.
75. Leppälä S. (2015). Economic analysis of knowledge: Тhe history of thought and the central themes. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 263—286. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12052
76. Levine D. K. (2011). Neuroeconomics? International Review of Economics, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 287—305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-011-0128-7
77. Levy D. J., Glimcher P. W. (2012). The root of all value: А neural common currency for choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 1027—1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.06.001
78. Luzan V. S., Koptseva N. P., Zabelina E. V., Kurnosova S. A., Trushina I. A. (2019). The structure of economic attitudes of the youth — Representatives of the indigenous small-numbered peoples of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation: Results of a pilot study. Journal of Siberian Federal University: Humanities & Social Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 12, pp. 1146—1162. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0448
79. Macfie A. (1963). Economics — science, ideology, philosophy? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 212—225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1963.tb00333.x
80. Machlup F. (1955). The problem of verification in economics. Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1—21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1054005
81. Mäki U. (2000). Kinds of assumptions and their truth. Shaking an untwisted F-twist. Kyklos, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 303—322. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00123
82. Mäki U. (ed.) (2001). The economic world view. Studies in the ontology of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752049
83. Martin D. A. (1990). Economics as ideology: Оn making “the invisible hand” invisible. Review of Social Economy, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 272—287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346769000000024
84. Martin N. G., Eaves L. J., Heath A. C., Jardine R., Feingold L. M., Eysenck H. J. (1986). Transmission of social attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 83, No. 12, pp. 4364—4368. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.12.4364
85. Marwell G., Ames R. E. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 295—310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(81)90013-X
86. Matossian M. (1958). Ideologies of delayed industrialization: Some tensions and ambiguities. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 6, Nо. 3, pp. 217—228. https://doi.org/10.1086/449767
87. Mazzoleni O., Ivaldi G. (2022). Economic populist sovereignism and electoral support for radical right-wing populism. Political Studies, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 304—326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720958567
88. Melitz J. (1965). Friedman and Machlup on the significance of testing economic assumptions. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 37—60. https://doi.org/10.1086/258991
89. Melki M. (2011). Ideology in economics: Taking stock, looking ahead (Working Paper No. 51). University Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne, Committee on Concepts and Methods.
90. Mexhuani F., Mexhuani B. (2024). Authoritarian neoliberalism debates: A critical review of the literature in Central and Eastern Europe. New Perspectives, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 145—161. https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X241230935
91. Minkkinen M. (2020). Theories in futures studies: Examining the theory base of the futures field in light of survey results. World Futures Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 12—25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756719887717
92. Mises L. von (1966). Human action: A treatise on economics. 3rd ed. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
93. Musgrave A. (1981). ”Unrealistic assumptions” in economic theory: Тhe F-twist untwisted. Kyklos, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 377—387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1981.tb01195.x
94. Nelson J. A. (1993). Gender and economic ideologies. Review of Social Economy, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 287—301. https://doi.org/10.1080/758537259
95. Nickerson R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 175—220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
96. North D. С. (1988). Ideology and political/economic institutions. Cato Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 15—28.
97. North D. (1992). Institutions, ideology, and economic performance. Cato Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 477—488.
98. North D. С. (2010). Economics and cognitive science. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 7371—7376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.099
99. Pareto W. (1916 [1935]). Trattato di Sociologia Generale [The Mind and Society]. Harcourt: Brace.
100. Powers K. E., Reifler J., Scotto T. J. (2021). Going nativist: How nativism and economic ideology interact to shape beliefs about global trade. Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 17, No. 3, article orab015. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orab015
101. Pryke S. (2012). Economic nationalism: Theory, history and prospects. Global Policy, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 281—291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00146.x
102. Ralston D., Holt D., Terpstra R., Yu K.-С. (1997). The impact of natural culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: A study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 177—207. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490097
103. Riedel R. (2017). Economic nationalism and populism — Intertwining relations. Przegląd Politologiczny, No. 3, pp. 7—20. https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2017.22.3.1
104. Rizzello S. (1999). The economics of the mind. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035304097
105. Robbins L. (1935). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan.
106. Roos M., Reccius M. (2024). Narratives in economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 303—341. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12576
107. Ross D. (2005). Economic theory and cognitive science: Microexplanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2600.001.0001
108. Rosser J. B., Jr. (1993). Belief: Its role in economic thought and action. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 355—368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1993.tb02555.x
109. Rubin P. H. (2003). Folk economics. Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 157—171. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2003.tb00561.x
110. Sacco P. L. (2020). ‘There are more things in heaven and earth…’ A ‘narrative turn’ in economics? Journal of Cultural Economics, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 173—183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-020-09377-1
111. Samuels W. J. (1992). Ideology in economics. In: W. J. Samuels. Essays on the methodology and discourse of economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 233—248. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12371-1_12
112. Samuelson L. (2004). Modeling knowledge in economic analysis. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 367—403. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051041409057
113. Schumpeter J. A. (1949). Science and ideology. American Economic Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 346—359.
114. Serra D. (2022). Controversies around neuroeconomics: Empirical, methodological and philosophical issues. Revue de philosophie économique, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 135—193. https://doi.org/10.3917/rpec.232.0135
115. Shiller R. J. (2017). Narrative economics. American Economic Review, Vol. 107, No. 4, pp. 967—1004. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.107.4.967
116. Shiller R. J. (2019). Narratives about technology-induced job degradation then and now. Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 477—488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.03.015
117. Simon H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York: Macmillan.
118. Simon H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 99—118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
119. Slembeck T. (2004). Ideologies, beliefs, and economic advice — a cognitive-evolutionary view on economic policy. In: P. Pelikan, G. Wegner (еds.). The evolutionary analysis of economic policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 128—161. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035304882.00012
120. Solow R. (1971). Science and ideology in economics. Public Interest, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 94—107.
121. Spiegler R. (2008). Comments on the potential significance of neuroeconomics for economic theory. Economics & Philosophy, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 515—521. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267108002125
122. Stahel A. W. (2020). Is economics a science? Real-world Economics Review, No. 94, pp. 61—82.
123. Stigler G. (1959). The politics of political economists. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 73, No. 4 pp. 522—532. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884301
124. Stigler G. J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 213—225. https://doi.org/10.1086/258464
125. Stiglitz J. E. (2002). Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 3, pp. 460—501. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260136363
126. Tydeman J., Mitchell R. B. (1977). Subjective information modelling. Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1, Part 1, pp. 1—19. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1977.1
127. Vasyliev S., Kysko A., Nikolenko L. (2023). Economic ideology as an innovative potential of the change process. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 33—40. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-3-33-40
128. Viale R. (ed.) (1997). Cognitive economics: Lascomes Series 1. Torino: La Rosa.
129. Walsh J., Vaida N., Coman A., Fiske S. T. (2022). Stories in action. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 99—141. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006231161337
130. Walther R. (1984). Economic liberalism. Economy and Society, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 178—207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085148300000019
131. Weatherford M. S., McDonnell L. M. (1984). The role of presidential ideology in economic policymaking. Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 691—702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1984.tb00483.x
132. Westbrook A., Braver T. S. (2015). Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 15, No. 2, pр. 395—415. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0334-y
133. Winch D. (1985). Economic liberalism as ideology: The Appleby version. Economic History Review, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 287—297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2597149
134. Yu R. J., Zhou X. L. (2007). Neuroeconomics: Opening the “black box” behind the economic behavior. Chinese Science Bulletin, Vol. 52, No. 9, pp. 1153—1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0193-1
135. Zabelina E., Deyneka O., Tsiring D. (2019). Entrepreneurial attitudes in the structure of students’ economic minds. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 1621—1633. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0224
136. Zafirovski M. (2019). Economics and apologetics — The ideology/utopia of laissez-faire and its discontents. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 647—676. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2019.1634455
137. Zmigrod L. (2021). A neurocognitive model of ideological thinking. Politics and the Life Sciences, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 224—238. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2021.10
Дополнительные файлы
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Тамбовцев В.Л. Экономическая идеология: варианты пониманий и применения понятия. Вопросы экономики. 2024;(10):5-27. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-10-5-27
For citation:
Tambovtsev V.L. Economic ideology: Versions of the concept’s acceptations and application. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2024;(10):5-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-10-5-27
Просмотров:
829
Послать статью по эл. почте 
