Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessing the predictability of the Bank of Russia decisions on the key rate and informational advantage in its forecasting

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-4-70-91

Abstract

The communication policy of central banks plays a significant role in setting the expectations of economic agents. If key rate decisions are inconsistent with market expectations, managing expectations and anchoring inflation expectations may be difficult. We assess the predictability of the Bank of Russia’s key rate decisions over the 2021—2023 period in two ways: using media surveys of analysts and shifts in the Russian government bond index and the daily volatility of its yield. The results show a significant impact of unexpected key rate decisions on Russian government bond prices and daily volatility. Then, using statistical metrics computed from macroeconomic survey data and another linear and piecewise linear model, we find the informational advantage of the Bank of Russia in predicting the key rate. The decisions unexpected for the market are explained by the information advantage of the Bank of Russia, as well as the realization of geopolitical and inflation risks in the period under study. Thus, we conclude that there is a need to improve the quality of communication regarding future decisions. As the communication policy develops, the predictability of the Bank of Russia’s decisions on the key rate will increase. In turn, economic agents and market participants will adapt to the expected decisions in advance, which will accelerate the achievement of the inflation target and the adjustment of inflation expectations.

About the Author

M. I. Abdurakhmanov
Bank of Russia; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Mansur I. Abdurakhmanov

Moscow



References

1. Abdurakhmanov M. (2023). Modelling the еffect of Bank of Russia key rate forecasts on market participants’ expectations. Russian Journal of Money and Finance, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 3—20.

2. Abdurakhmanov M. (2024). Key rate as a tool to prevent financial instability based on market expectations. Finance and Сredit, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 308—331. (In Russian).]https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.30.2.308

3. Evstigneeva A., Shchadilova Y., Sidorovskiy M. (2022). The role of communication and information factors in the emergence of surprises in Bank of Russia monetary policy. Bank of Russia Working Paper Series, No. 99. (In Russian).

4. Isakov A., Grishin P., Gorlinsky O. (2018). Fear of forward guidance. Russian Journal of Money and Finance, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 84—106. https://doi.org/10.31477/rjmf.201804.84

5. Smirnov S., Kondrashov N., Kachur A. (2024). Macroeconomic forecasting and macroeconomic forecasts. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 2, pp. 23—48. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-2-23-48

6. Adrian T., Laxton D., Obstfeld M. (eds.) (2018). Advancing the frontiers of monetary policy. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

7. Al-Mashat R., Clinton K., Laxton D., Wang H. (2018). Managing expectations. In: T. Adrian, D. Laxton, M. Obstfeld (eds.). Advancing the frontiers of monetary policy. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, pp. 31—44.

8. Aruoba B., Fernández A., Guzmán D., Pastén E., Saffie F. (2021). Monetary policy surprises in Chile: Measurement and real effects. Central Bank of Chile Working Papers, No. 921.

9. Baghestani H. (2008). Federal Reserve versus private information: Who is the best unemployment rate predictor? Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 101—110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2007.05.002

10. Bernanke B. S., Reinhart V., Sack B. (2004). Monetary policy alternatives at the zero bound: An empirical assessment (Finance and Economics Discussion Series, No. 48). Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Board. https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2004.48

11. Bernanke B. S. (2007). Federal Reserve сommunications: Speech at the Cato Institute 25th Annual Monetary Conference. Washington, DC.

12. Blinder A. (2004). The quiet revolution: Central banking goes modern. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.

13. Blinder A., Ehrmann M., Fratzscher M., De Haan J., Jansen D.-J. (2008). Central bank communication and monetary policy: A survey of theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 910—945. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.4.910

14. Binder C., Sekkel R. (2023). Central bank forecasting: A survey. Bank of Canada Staff Working Paper, No. 2023-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12554

15. Bu C., Rogers J., Wu W. (2021). A unified measure of Fed monetary policy shocks. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 118, pp. 331—349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2020.11.002

16. Ceballos L. (2014). The yield curve factors and economic surprises in the Chilean bond market. Revista de Análisis Económico, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 3—24. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-88702014000200001

17. Champagne J., Poulin-Bellisle G., Sekkel R. (2020). Introducing the Bank of Canada staff economic projections database. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 114—129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2744

18. de Mendonça H. F., Diaz R. R. R. (2023). Can ignorance about the interest rate and macroeconomic surprises affect the stock market return? Evidence from a large emerging economy. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101868

19. Eksi O., Tas B.-K.-O., Orman C. (2017). Has the forecasting performance of the Federal Reserve’s Greenbooks changed over time? B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 1—25. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2016-0130

20. Gavin W. T., Pande G. (2008). FOMC consensus forecasts. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 149—163. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.90.149-164

21. Gürkaynak R. S., Kisacikoğlu B., Wright J. H. (2020). Missing events in event studies: Identifying the effects of partially measured news surprises. American Economic Review, Vol. 110, No. 12, pp. 3871—3912. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181470

22. Gürkaynak R. S., Sack B., Swanson E. T. (2005). Do actions speak louder than words? The response of asset prices to monetary policy actions and statements. International Journal of Central Banking, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 55—93.

23. Hoesch L., Rossi B., Sekhposyan T. (2023). Has the information channel of monetary policy disappeared? Revisiting the empirical evidence. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 355—387. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20200068

24. Hubert P. (2015a). ECB projections as a tool for understanding policy decisions. Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 574—587. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2356

25. Hubert P. (2015b). Do central bank forecasts influence private agents? Forecasting performance versus signals. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 771—789. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12227

26. IMF (2018). World economic outlook: Challenges to steady growth. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, October.

27. Issing O. (2005). Communication, transparency, accountability: Monetary policy in the 21st century. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 65—84. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.87.65-83

28. Kuttner K. (2001). Monetary policy surprises and interest rates: Evidence from the Fed funds futures market. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 523—544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(01)00055-1

29. Lambrias K., Page A. (2019). The performance of the Eurosystem/ECB staff macroeconomic projections since the financial crisis. ECB Economic Bulletin, No. 8.

30. Romer C., Romer D. (2000). Federal Reserve information and the behavior of interest rates. American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 429—457. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.3.429

31. Rossi B., Sekhposyan T. (2016). Forecast rationality tests in the presence of instabilities, with applications to Federal Reserve and survey forecasts. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 507—532. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2440

32. Sims C. (2002). The role of models and probabilities in the monetary policy process. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 1—62. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2003.0009

33. Woodford M. (2003). Interest and рrices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Abdurakhmanov M.I. Assessing the predictability of the Bank of Russia decisions on the key rate and informational advantage in its forecasting. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2024;(4):70-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-4-70-91

Views: 1112


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)