

Mathematical Formalism and Political-Economic Content
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-7-82-95
Abstract
Mathematical methods are only one moment in a layered process of theory generation in political economy, which starts from Schumpeterian vision, progresses to the identification of relevant abstractions, the development of mathematical and quantitative models, and the confrontation of theories with empirical data through statistical methods. But today the relevant abstract problems of political economy are modified to fit available mathematical tools. The role of empirical research in disciplining theoretical speculation, on which the scientific traditions integrity rests, was undermined by specific limitations of nascent econometric methods, and usurped by ex cathedra methodological fiats of theorists. These developmentssystematically favored certain ideological predispositions of economicsas a discipline. There is abundant room for New Thinking in political economy starting from the vision of the capitalist economy as a complex, adaptive system far from equilibrium, including the development of the theory of statistical fluctuations for economic interactions, redirection of macroeconomics and financial economics from path prediction toward an understanding of the qualitative properties of the system, introduction of constructive and computable methods into economic modeling, and the critical reconstruction of econometric statistical methods.
References
1. Cooper R., John A. (1988). Coordinating Coordination Failures in Keynesian Models // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 103, No 3. P. 441-463.
2. Diamond P. A. (1982). Aggregate Demand Management in Search Equilibrium // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 90, No 5. P. 881-894.
3. Foley D. K. (2003). Unholy Trinity: Labor, Capital, and Land in the New Economy. L.: Routledge.
4. Foley D. K. (2006). Adam's Fallacy: A Guide to Economic Theology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Foley D. K. (2010). What's Wrong with the Fundamental Existence and Welfare Theorems? // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Vol. 75, No 2. P. 115-131.
6. Jaynes E. T., Bretthorst G. L. (eds.) (2003). Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Malthus T. R. (1985). An Essay on Principle of Population. N. Y.: Penguin.
8. Ricardo D. (1951). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Smith A. (1937). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. N. Y.: Random House.
10. Smith E., Foley D. K. (2008). Classical Thermodynamics and Economic General Equilibrium Theory // Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. Vol. 32, No 1. P. 7-65.
11. Sraffa P. (1960). Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Velupillai K. V. (2004). Constructivity, Computability and Computers in Economic Theory: Some Cautionary Notes// Metroeconomica Special Issue: Computability, Constructivity, and Complexity in Economic Theory. Vol. 55, No 2-3. P. 121-140.
Review
For citations:
Foley D. Mathematical Formalism and Political-Economic Content. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2012;(7):82-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-7-82-95