Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Connection fee as a factor to ensure financial affordability of utility services for consumers

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-5-38-54

Abstract

Utilities as a type of mixed public good have the characteristic of non-rivalry, that is, they must be available to the entire population without exception and all households must be able to pay for them. As a rule, such financial inclusion is achieved by providing targeted assistance to low-income families. For example, in Russia this problem is solved by a program of subsidies for housing and communal services. In various countries, other mechanisms are also used: the provision of social housing, budget subsidies for producers, price discrimination. This paper analyzes another way to reduce the financial burden for consumers of utility services, which has been used in most developed countries. It consists of shifting part of the costs of developing engineering infrastructure to future consumers through connection fees (technological connection) for capital construction projects. From the perspective of pricing theory, it is shown that connection fees can reduce the average costs of a utility company passed on to consumers of services; it is graphically illustrated how connection fees increase the financial affordability of utility services for consumers and reduce budget costs for subsidizing the payment of housing and communal services for households with low incomes.

About the Authors

S. B. Sivaev
https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/204488
HSE University
Russian Federation

Sergey B. Sivaev - Candidate of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Vysokovsky Graduate School of Urbanism, Faculty of Urban and Regional Development.

Moscow



O. O. Smirnov
https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/305122335?ysclid=lluics9kr1908538225
HSE University
Russian Federation

Oleg O. Smirnov - Postgraduate Student of National Research University Higher School of Economics.

Moscow



A. M. Abdullaev
https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/305052776
HSE University
Russian Federation

Alexander M. Abdullaev - Junior Researcher, Postgraduate Student of the Vysokovsky Graduate School of Urbanism, Faculty of Urban and Regional Development.

Moscow



References

1. Askerov E. N. (2009). Who should pay for urban growth? Mechanisms for financing the development of municipal infrastructure. Russian Economic Online Journal, No. 1, pp. 1—19. (In Russian).

2. Gitelman L. D., Dobrodey V. V., Kozhevnikov M. V. (2020). Tools for sustainable development of regional energy systems. Economy of Region, No. 4, pp. 1208—1223. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-14

3. Dolmatov I. A., Zolotova I. Y., Maskaev I. V. (2017). New tariff regulation for natural monopolies: What should it be? Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, No. 4—5, pp. 30—37. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2017-4-5-30-37

4. IPEM (2022). The growth of utilities tariffs in the regions of Russia in 2022. Analytical report. Moscow: Institute for Natural Monopolies Research. (In Russian).

5. Kameneva E. A. (2010). The specifics of housing and communal services as an object of financial relations in housing and communal services. Finance and Credit, No. 22, pp. 7—14. (In Russian).

6. Naiden S. N. (2017). Expenses of population and budgets: Some results of municipal reform. Power and Administration in the East of Russia, No. 4, pp. 39—48. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2017-81-4-39-48

7. Pavlova N. S. (2017). Negative effects of monopolistic activity. Economic aspects. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University, No. 9, pp. 74—80. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2017.37.9.074-080

8. Repetyuk S. V., Mozgovaya O. O., Fayn B. I. (2016). Distribution electricity network connection activities: Practice of regulation in Russian Federation and other countries. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, No. 1, pp. 61—78. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2016-1-05

9. Sivaev S. B., Smirnov O. O. (2023). Approaches to regulation of tariffs for connecting capital construction objects to public utilities infrastructure. Public Administraion Issues, No. 1, pp. 150—175. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-1-150-175

10. Sivaev S. B., Puzanov A. S., Askerov E. N. (2007). Public welfare and public infrastructure: Issues of growth and development. In: A. P. Zaostrovtsev (ed.). Economic theory and history. St. Petersburg: Leontief Center, pp. 182—196. (In Russian).

11. Stennikov V. A., Penkovskii A. V. (2019). Heat supply of consumers under market conditions: Current status and development trends. ECO, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 8—20. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2019-3-8-20

12. Sharygina Y. A., Sivaev S. B. (2015). Comparative analysis of the housing and utility services affordability for the population of the Russian Federation and foreign countries. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 6, pp. 63—80. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-6-63-80

13. Yakobson L. I., Kolosnitsyna M. G. (eds.) (2017). Economics of the public sector. Moscow: Yurayt. (In Russian).

14. Altshuler A., Gómez-Ibáñez J. (1993). Regulation for revenue: The political economy of land use exactions. Washington, DC; Cambridge: Brookings; Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

15. Been V. (2005). Impact fees and housing affordability. Cityscape, No. 1, pp. 139—185. Brueckner J. K. (1997). Infrastructure financing in urban development: The economics of impact fees. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 383—407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00036-4

16. Burge G., Ihlanfeldt K. (2006). Impact fees and housing affordability. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 284—306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.03.002

17. Carrión C., Libby L. W. (2001). Development impact fees: A рrimer. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

18. Cournot A. A. (1897). Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth. London: Macmillan.

19. Dol K., Haffner M. (eds.) (2010). Housing statistics in the European Union, 2010. The Hague: Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations.

20. Farrer T. H. (1902). The state in its relation to trade. London and New York: Macmillan. Inchauste G., Karver J., Kim Y. S., Jelil M. A. (2018). Living and leaving: Housing, mobility and welfare in the European Union. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/30898

21. Komives K. (2005). Water, electricity, and the poor: Who benefits from utility subsidies? Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6342-3

22. LOC (2020). System development charges survey report. Salem, OR: League of Oregon Cities.

23. Marshall A. (1930). Principles of еconomics. London: Macmillan.

24. Mathur S., Waddell P., Blanco H. (2004). The effect of impact fees on the price of new single-family housing. Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 7, pp. 1303—1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000214806

25. Nelson A. C., Moody M. (2003). Paying for рrosperity: Impact fees and job growth. The Brookings Institution.

26. Nicholas J. C., Nelson A. C., Julian C. J. (1991). A practitioner’s guide to development impact fees. Chicago, Illinois; Washington, DC: Planners Pres, American Planning Association.

27. Peterson G. E. (2009). Unlocking land values to finance urban infrastructure. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7709-3

28. Pigou A. C. (1932). The economic of welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan.

29. Ryu Y. (2023). Theoretical reflections on the calculation of development impact fees. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, No. 1, pp. 55—71. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2023.26.1.55

30. Slack E. (2002). Municipal finance and the pattern of urban growth. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.

31. Slack E., Bird R. M. (1991). Financing urban growth through development charges. Canadian Tax Journal, No. 5, pp. 1288—1304.

32. Smith A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Methuen & Co.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Sivaev S.B., Smirnov O.O., Abdullaev A.M. Connection fee as a factor to ensure financial affordability of utility services for consumers. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2024;(5):38-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-5-38-54

Views: 350


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)