Preview

Вопросы экономики

Расширенный поиск
Доступ открыт Открытый доступ  Доступ закрыт Только для подписчиков

Влиятельные индивиды: подходы к моделированию

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-9-114-131

Полный текст:

Аннотация

В статье рассматриваются теоретические и экспериментальные подходы к моделированию социальных взаимодействий. Общение и обмен информацией с другими людьми влияют на поведение человека в разных сферах жизни. В основном такое влияние оказывают лидеры, выдающиеся индивиды , обладающие высоким социальным статусом или экспертными знаниями. Социальные взаимодействия исследуются в моделях социального обучения, теоретико-игровых моделях, моделях конформности и др. Не хватает формальных моделей асимметричных взаимодействий, с помощью которых можно выделить объективные характеристики, отражающие высокий социальный статус индивида и его восприятие другими, а также показать влияние лидера на других людей и проанализировать механизм этого влияния.

Об авторе

О. Ю. Бондаренко
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики».
Россия

Бондаренко Оксана Юрьевна, аспирант  Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики».

Москва. 



Список литературы

1. Acemoglu D., Jackson M. O. (2014). History, expectations, and leadership in the evolution of social norms. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 423—456.

2. Acemoglu D., Ozdaglar A., ParandehGheibi A. (2010). Spread of (mis) information in social networks. Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 194—227.

3. Alonso R., Câmara O. (2014). Persuading skeptics and reaffirming believers. USC Marshall School of Business Research Paper Series. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/58680/1/Alonso_Camara_Persuading-skeptics-and-reaffirming-believers_2014.pdf

4. Alonso R., Câmara O. (2016). Bayesian persuasion with heterogeneous priors. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 165, pp. 672—706.

5. Amato J., Morris S., Shin H. (2002). Communication and monetary policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 495—503.

6. Asch S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In: H. Guetzkow (ed.). Groups, leadership and men: Research in human relations. Oxford: Carnegie Press, pp. 177—190.

7. Bandura A. (1977). Social learning theory. Oxford: Prentice-Hall.

8. Banerjee A. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 3, pp. 797—817.

9. Banerjee A., Chandrasekhar A., Duflo E., Jackson M. (2014). Gossip: Identifying central individuals in a social network. NBER Working Papers, No. 20422.

10. Bergemann D., Brooks B., Morris S. (2015). The limits of price discrimination. American Economic Review, Vol. 105, No. 3, pp. 921—957.

11. Bernheim B. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 102, No. 5, pp. 841—877.

12. Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, No. 5, pp. 992—1026.

13. Bikhchandani S., Sharma S. (2000). Herd behavior in financial markets. IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 279—310.

14. Blume L., Brock W., Durlauf S., Ioannides Y. (2010). Identification of social interactions. Unpublished manuscript. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1660002

15. Bond R., Fariss C., Jones J., Kramer A., Marlow C., Settle J., Fowler J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, Vol. 489, No. 7415, pp. 295—298.

16. Bramoullé Y., Kranton R. (2007). Public goods in networks. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 135, No. 1, pp. 478—494.

17. Brocas I., Carrillo J. (2007). Influence through ignorance. RAND Journal of Economics , Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 931—947.

18. Bursztyn L., Ederer F., Ferman B., Yuchtman N. (2014). Understanding mechanisms underlying peer effects: Evidence from a field experiment on financial decisions. Econometrica, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 1273—1301.

19. Butos W., Koppl R. (1993). Hayekian expectations: theory and empirical applications. Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 303—329.

20. Caillaud B., Tirole J. (2007). Consensus building: How to persuade a group. American Economic Review, Vol. 97, No. 5, pp. 1877—1900.

21. Case A. C., Katz L. F. (1991). The company you keep: The effects of family and neighborhood on disadvantaged youths. NBER Working Papers, No. 3705.

22. Çelen B., Kariv S. (2004). Distinguishing informational cascades from herd behavior in the laboratory. American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 484—498.

23. Christakis N., Fowler J. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 357, pp. 370—379.

24. Cornand C., Heinemann F. (2014). Measuring agents’ reaction to private and public information in games with strategic complementarities. Experimental Economics, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 61—77.

25. Currarini S., Feri F., Meléndez-Jiménez M. (2014). An experimental study on information sharing networks. Unpublished manuscript. https://sites.fas.harvard.edu/~histecon/informationtransmission/papers/CurrariniFeriMelendez_January15.pdf

26. D’Adda G. (2012). Leadership and influence: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment on local public good provision. ECON—Working Papers, No. 059. University of Zurich, Department of Economics.

27. DeGroot M. (1974). Reaching a consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association , Vol. 69, No. 345, pp. 118—121.

28. DeMarzo P., Vayanos D., Zwiebel J. (2003). Persuasion bias, social influence, and unidimensional opinions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, No. 3, pp. 909—968.

29. Duflo E., Saez E. (2002). Participation and investment decisions in a retirement plan: The influence of colleagues’ choices. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 121—148.

30. Easley D., Kleinberg J. (2010). Games. In: D. Easley, J. Kleinberg. Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press, pp. 139—179.

31. Eckel C., Fatas E., Wilson R. (2010). Cooperation and status in organizations. Journal of Public Economic Theory, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 737—762.

32. Ely J., Frankel A., Kamenica E. (2015). Suspense and surprise. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 123, No. 1, pp. 215—260.

33. Evans W., Oates W., Schwab R. (1992). Measuring peer group effects: A study of teenage behavior. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, No. 5, pp. 966—991.

34. Fafchamps M., Kebede B., Zizzo D. (2015). Keep up with the winners: Experimental evidence on risk taking, asset integration, and peer effects. European Economic Review, Vol. 79, pp. 59—79.

35. Falk A., Ichino A. (2006). Clean evidence on peer effects. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 39—57.

36. Fallers L. (1954). A note on the “trickle effect”. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 314—321.

37. Flynn L., Goldsmith R., Eastman J. K. (1996). Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 137—147.

38. Freeman L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 215—239.

39. Gächter S., Renner E. (2014). Leaders as role models for the voluntary provision of public goods. CESifo Working Paper, No. 5049.

40. Galeotti A., Goyal S., Jackson M. O., Vega-Redondo F., Yariv L. (2010). Network games. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 218—244.

41. Gentzkow M., Kamenica E. (2014). Costly persuasion. The American Economic Review, Vol. 104, No. 5, pp. 457—462.

42. Gick W., Pausch T. (2012). Persuasion by stress testing: Optimal disclosure of super‑ visory information in the banking sector. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=279688

43. Glaeser E., Sacerdote B., Scheinkman J. (1996). Crime and social interactions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 111, No. 2, pp. 507—548.

44. Glaeser E., Scheinkman J. (2001). Measuring social interactions. In: S. Durlauf, H. P. Young (ed.). Social dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 83—160.

45. Goldstein I., Leitner Y. (2018). Stress tests and information disclosure. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 177, pp. 34—69.

46. Golub B., Jackson M. O. (2012). How homophily affects the speed of learning and best- response dynamics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 127, No. 3, pp. 1287—1338.

47. Hirshleifer D., Hong T. S. (2003). Herd behaviour and cascading in capital markets: A review and synthesis. European Financial Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 25—66.

48. Hong H., Kubik J., Stein J. (2004). Social interaction and stock-market participation. Journal of Finance, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 137—163.

49. Iyengar R., Van den Bulte C., Valente T. (2011). Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Science, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 195—212.

50. Jack B., Recalde M. P. (2015). Leadership and the voluntary provision of public goods: Field evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 122, pp. 80—93.

51. Jackson M. O. (2010). Learning and Networks. In: M. O. Jackson. Social and economic networks. Princeton University Press, pp. 223—253.

52. Kamenica E., Gentzkow M. (2011). Bayesian persuasion. American Economic Review, Vol. 101, No. 6, pp. 2590—2615.

53. Katz E., Lazarsfeld P., Roper E. (2005). Personal influence. New York: Routledge.

54. Kolotilin A. (2014). Optimal information disclosure: Quantity vs. quality. UNSW Australian School of Business Research Paper, No. 2013-19. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2302448

55. Kolotilin A. (2015). Experimental design to persuade. Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 90, pp. 215—226.

56. Kolotilin A., Mylovanov T., Zapechelnyuk A., Li M. (2017). Persuasion of a privately informed receiver. Econometrica, Vol. 85, No. 6, pp. 1949—1964.

57. Koppl R., Mramor D. (2003). Big players in Slovenia. Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 16, No. 2—3, pp. 253—269.

58. Koppl R., Yeager L. (1996). Big players and herding in asset markets: The case of the Russian ruble. Explorations in Economic History, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 367—383.

59. Kumru C., Vesterlund L. (2010). The effect of status on charitable giving. Journal of Public Economic Theory, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 709—735.

60. Lahno A., Serra-Garcia M. (2015). Peer effects in risk taking: Envy or conformity? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 73—95.

61. Linde J., Sonnemans J. (2012). Social comparison and risky choices. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 45—72.

62. Ling Q., Lin M., Wu X. (2016). The trickle-down effect of servant leadership on frontline employee service behaviors and performance: A multilevel study of Chinese hotels. Tourism Management, Vol. 52, pp. 341—368.

63. Liu X., Patacchini E., Zenou Y. (2014). Endogenous peer effects: local aggregate or local average? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 103, pp. 39—59.

64. Mas A., Moretti E. (2009). Peers at work. American Economic Review, Vol. 99, No. 1, pp. 112—145.

65. McCannon B. C. (2018). Leadership and motivation for public goods contributions. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 65, No.1, pp. 68—96.

66. McCracken G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 310—321.

67. Mesoudi A. (2009). The cultural dynamics of copycat suicide. PLoS One, Vol. 4, No. 9.

68. Nair G., Gustavsson L., Mahapatra K. (2010). Factors influencing energy efficiency investments in existing Swedish residential buildings. Energy Policy, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 2956—2963.

69. Patacchini E., Zenou Y. (2012). Ethnic networks and employment outcomes. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 938—949.

70. Rayo L., Segal I. (2010). Optimal information disclosure. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 118, No. 5, pp. 949—987.

71. Riquelme F., González-Cantergiani P. (2016). Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 949—975.

72. Rogers E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press.

73. Sacerdote B. (2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 2, pp. 681—704.

74. Schelling T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

75. Schweizer N., Szech N. (2018). Optimal revelation of life-changing information. Management Science, February 21. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2913

76. Smith L., Sørensen P. (2000). Pathological outcomes of observational learning. Econometrica , Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 371—398.

77. Trigo P. (2014). Multi-Agent economically motivated decision making. In: D. F. Adamatti (ed.). Interdisciplinary applications of agent‑based social simulation and modeling. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 165—182.

78. Valente T., Davis R. (1999). Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders . Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 566, No. 1, pp. 55—67.

79. Van Eck P. S., Jager W., Leeflang P. S. (2011). Opinion leaders’ role in innovation diffusion: A simulation study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 187—203.

80. Weeks B., Ardèvol-Abreu A., Gil de Zúсiga H. (2015). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 214—239.

81. Wood W., Hayes T. (2012). Social Influence on consumer decisions: Motives, modes, and consequences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 324—328.

82. Zaller J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

83. Zenger J., Folkman J. (2016). From feedback to impact. AM Azure Consulting Ltd. http:// www.amazureconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/FromFeedbackToImpact.pdf

84. Zimbardo P., Haney C., Banks W., Jaffe D. (1973). A Pirandellian prison. New York Times Magazine, April 8, p. 38—60.


Для цитирования:


Бондаренко О.Ю. Влиятельные индивиды: подходы к моделированию. Вопросы экономики. 2018;(9):114-131. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-9-114-131

For citation:


Bondarenko O.Y. Influential individuals: Approach to modeling. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018;(9):114-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-9-114-131

Просмотров: 57


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)