Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Assessment of the state and level of development of public-private partnership projects in the subjects of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-7-131-141
Abstract
The article analyzes the current state and level of development of publicprivate partnership (PPP) projects in the subjects of the Russian Federation. The authors conclude that a significant proportion of projects is implemented on a concession basis at the municipal level in the communal sphere. A detailed analysis of the project data showed that the structure of the projects is deformed in favor of the central regions of the Russian Federation, and a significant share in the total amount of financing falls on the transport sector. At the stage of assessing the level of development by the subjects of the Russian Federation, criteria were proposed, and index and integral indicators were used, which ensured comparability of the estimates obtained. At the end of the analysis, the regions were ranked and clustered according to the level of PPP development, which allowed to reveal the number and structure of leaders and outsiders.
About the Authors
A. N. Savrukov
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (Moscow)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. T. Savrukov
Nizhny Novgorod State University of Engineering and Economics (Knyaginino)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. A. Kozlovskaya
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (St. Petersburg)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Agenor P.-R., Nabli M., Tarik M. (2005). Public infrastructure and private investment in the Middle East and North Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Pape r , No. 3661.
2. Aschauer D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics , Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 177—200.
3. Barro R. J., Sala-i-Martin X. (2004). Economic growth. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
4. Beyzatlar M. A., Karacal M., Yetkiner H. (2014). Granger-causality between transportation and GDP: A panel data approach. Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 63, pp. 43—55.
5. Bougheas S., Demetriades P. O., Morgenroth E. L. (1999). Infrastructure, transport costs and trade. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 47, pp. 189—196.
6. Chen Z., Haynes K. E. (2014). Public surface transportation and regional output: A spatial panel approach. Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 727—751.
7. Cohen J., Monaco K. (2008). Ports and highways Infrastructure. An analysis of i ntra and interstate spillovers. International Regional Science Review, Vol. 31, pp. 257—274.
8. Fan S., Zhang X. (2004). Infrastructure and regional economic development in rural China. China Economic Review, Vol. 15, pp. 203—214.
9. Forkenbrock D. J., Foster N. S. (19 9 0). Economic benefits of corridor i nvestment projects. Transportation Research, Vol. 24A, No. 3, pp. 303—312.
10. Jiwattanakulpaisarn P., Noland R. B., Graham D. J. (2012). Marginal productivity of expanding highway capacity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 46, pp. 333—347.
11. Milbourne R., Glen D., Graham M. (2003). Public investment and economic growth. Applied Economics, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 527—540.
12. Perei ra A. M., Andraz J. M. (2013). On the economic effects of public i nfrastructure i nvestment: A survey of the international evidence. Journal of Economic Development , Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 1—37.
13. Romp W., de Haan J. (2007). Public capital and economic growth: A critical survey. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Vol. 8, No. s1, pp. 6—52.
14. Shioji E. (2001). Public capital and economic growth: A convergence approach. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 205—227.
15. Woetzel J., Garemo N., Mischke J., Hjerpe M., Palter R. (2016). Bridging global infrastructure gaps. McKinsey Global Institute.
Review
For citations:
Savrukov A.N., Savrukov N.T., Kozlovskaya E.A. Assessment of the state and level of development of public-private partnership projects in the subjects of the Russian Federation. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018;(7):131-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-7-131-141
Views:
1108
Email this article 
