

Large-scale reluctant privatization: Contradictions and challenges under sanctions
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-8-5-38
Abstract
The article discusses the practicability for privatizing some large Russian state-owned enterprises (SOEs) under sanctions. Privatization remains a significant trend in the economic policies of many countries, includingRussia. The revenues from privatization demonstrate a steady upward trend worldwide. The effect of external sanctions which create significant difficulties in conducting privatization inRussiadoes not remove from the agenda the issue of privatization of large companies, but also makes it more relevant. Privatization is an effective tool for forming a competitive environment, increasing the efficiency of SOEs and reducing the presence of the state as a direct participant in market relations. The article contains not only theoretical arguments in favor of privatization, but also its relevance, especially considering the sectoral structure of the economy and the performance indicators of large SOEs. A particular feature of the research methodology is the evaluation of the performance of 29 large SOEs on the basis of a universal set of financial indicators. As a benchmark, we use the financial indicators of 144 Russian private companies and wide samples of foreign competitors for each SOE. The results show that the consolidated financial characteristics of SOEs tend to be inferior to those of private companies and foreign competitors. In addition, the total return, including dividend yield, on the state-owned enterprises’ equity is below the return of market benchmark with lowest risk.
About the Authors
A. D. RadyginRussian Federation
Alexander D. Radygin
Moscow
R. M. Entov
Russian Federation
Revold M. Entov
Moscow
A. E. Abramov
Russian Federation
Alexander E. Abramov
Moscow
I. V. Aksenov
Russian Federation
Ivan V. Aksenov
Moscow
G. N. Malginov
Russian Federation
Georgy N. Malginov
Moscow
M. I. Chernova
Russian Federation
Maria I. Chernova
Moscow
References
1. Abramov A. (2017). The Russian financial market: Drivers of development and constrains to growth. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).
2. Abramov A., Aksenov I., Radygin A., Chernova M. (2018a). Modern approaches to measuring the state sector: Methodology and empirics. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 36—69. (In Russian).
3. Abramov A., Aksenov I., Radygin A., Chernova M. (2018b). Modern approaches to measuring the state sector: Methodology and empirics. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 28—47. (In Russian).
4. Abramov A., Radygin A., Chernova M. (2016). State-owned enterprises in the Russian market: Ownership structure and their role in the economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 12, pp. 61—87. (In Russian).
5. Abramov A., Radygin A., Chernova M., Entov R. (2017). State ownership and efficiency characteristics. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 5—37. (In Russian).
6. Gurvich E., Prilepskiy I. (2016). The impact of financial sanctions on the Russian economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 5—35. (In Russian).
7. Laozi (2016). Dao De Jing. Sutra of the Way and its Power. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).
8. Lin J. Y. (2016). Demystifying the Chinese economy. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian).
9. Marx K., Engels F. (1960). Collected works. 2nd ed. Vol. 23. Moscow: Gospolitizdat. (In Russian).
10. Polterovich V. M. (2012). Privatization and the rational ownership structure. Moscow: Institute of Economics, RAS. (In Russian).
11. Radygin A. D., Abramov A. E., Aksenov I. V. et al. (2018). Effective management of state ownership in 2018—2024 and until 2035. Analytical report. Moscow: Center for Strategic Research. (In Russian).
12. Radygin A., Simachev Yu., Entov R. (2011). State and denationalization: Risks and limitations of the “New Privatization Policy”. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 9, pp. 4—26. (In Russian).
13. Radygin A., Simachev Yu., Entov R. (2015). State-owned company: Detection zone of government failure or market failure? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 45—79. (In Russian).
14. Radygin A., Entov R. (2012). Government failures: Theory and policy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 12, pp. 4—30. (In Russian).
15. Radygin A., Entov R. (2013). «Fundamental» theorem of privatization: Ideology, evolution, practice. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, No. 6, pp. 7—45. (In Russian).
16. Radygin A. D., Entov R. M., Malginov G. N. et al. (2014). Privatization in the modern world: Theory, empiricism, “a new dimension” for Russia. In 2 Vols. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).
17. Tambovtsev V. L. (ed.) (2009). Ownership rights, privatization and nationalization in Russia. Moscow: Fond “Liberalnaya Missiya”; Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. (In Russian).
18. Boardman A. E., Vining A. R. (1989). Ownership and performance in competitive environments: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed and state-owned enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 32, pp. 1—33.
19. Borcherding T., Pommerehne W., Schneider F. (1982). Comparing the efficiency of private and public production: The evidence from five countries. Zeitschrift für Nationaloekonomie, Bd. 89, S. 127—156.
20. Bortolotti B., Faccio M. (2004). Reluctant privatization. EGGI Working Paper, No. 4.
21. Bortolotti В., Pinotti P. (2008). Delayed privatization. Public Choice, Vol. 136, No. 3—4, pp. 331—351.
22. Boubakri N., Cosset J., Guedhami O. (2004). Postprivatization corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 62, pp. 369—399.
23. Cato S. (2012). The efficiency of state-owned firm and social welfare: A Note. Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 64, pp. 275—285.
24. Estrin S., Hanousek J., Kočenda E., Svejnar J. (2009). The effects of privatization and ownership in transition economies. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 699—728.
25. IMF (2015). People’s Republic of China. Article IV Consultation—Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for the People’s Republic of China. IMF Country Report, No. 15/234.
26. Lam W. R., Rodlauer M., Schipke A. (2017). State-owned enterprise reform. In: Modernizing China: Investing in soft infrastructure. Ch. 11. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
27. Marcelin I., Mathur I. (2015). Privatization, financial development, property rights and growth. Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 50, pp. 528—546.
28. Megginson W. L. (2005). The financial economics of privatization. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Megginson W. L. (2017). Privatization, state capitalism, and state ownership of business in the 21st century. Foundations and Trends in Finance, Vol. 11, No. 1—2, pp. 1—153.
30. OECD (2017). The size and sectoral distribution of state-owned enterprises. Paris: OECD Publishing.
31. Privatization Barometer (2016). The wave builds. The PB report 2014/2015. Milano: Privatization Barometer.
32. Privatization Barometer (2017). Two record years herald an ongoing privatization wave. The PB Report 2015/2016. Milano: Privatization Barometer.
33. Shirley M., Walsh P. (2000). Public versus private ownership: The current state of the debate. WB Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2420.
Review
For citations:
Radygin A.D., Entov R.M., Abramov A.E., Aksenov I.V., Malginov G.N., Chernova M.I. Large-scale reluctant privatization: Contradictions and challenges under sanctions. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018;(8):5-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-8-5-38