|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
How has economic science emerged: Competition of blueprints
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-3-5-23
Abstract
The formation of economics as a science is traditionally referenced to Adam Smith and presented — even if with reservations — as an ascent from delusions to true theory, underlying almost all modern schools of economic thought. Despite the importance of Smith’s Wealth of Nations, such a view does not reflect the real course of the evolvement of scientific economic knowledge and prevents adequate perception of the logic of its subsequent development. The article substantiates the need to rethink the initial phase of the history of economic science on the basis of a closer linkage of this history with the scientific revolution, which created conditions for the emergence of a whole range of blueprints of scientific economics, associated with such names as William Petty, John Law, James Steuart. It is shown that the blueprint of theoretical economics, which set the course for the development of economic science and was personified by Adam Smith, relied heavily on the work of Richard Cantillon, who generalized knowledge and experiences of mercantilist writers on the methodological basis that arose during the scientific revolution of the 17th — early 18th centuries.
About the Author
О. I. Ananyin
HSE University;
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg I. Ananyin
Moscow
References
1. Blanqui J.-A. (2012). Histoire de l’économie politique en Europe depuis les anciens jusqu’à nos jours, Vol. 2. Moscow: URSS. (In Russian).
2. Gaidenko P. P. (1987). Evolution of the concept of science (XVII—XVIII). Formation of scientific programs of the modernity. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
3. Hobbes T. (1989). Elements of philosophy. In: Hobbes T. Works: in 2 vols., Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl, pp. 66—506. (In Russian).
4. Hobbes T. (1991). Leviathan or The matter, forme and power of a commonwealth ecclesiastical and civil. In: Hobbes T. Works: in 2 vols., Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian).
5. Dupont de Nemours P. S. (2008). De l’origine et des progrès d’une science nouvelle. In: Physiocrats. Selected economic works. Moscow: Eksmo, pp. 489—524. (In Russian).
6. Cossa L. (1900). Guida allo studio dell economia politica. Kyiv and Kharkov: South Russian Book Publishing House of F. A. Ioganson. (In Russian).
7. Locke J. (2019). Some considerations of the consequences of the lowering of interest and the raising the value of money. In: The ethics of interest: John Locke and Jeremy Bentham on the nature of loan interest and its regulation. Chelyabinsk and Moscow: Sotsium, pp. 49—200. (In Russian).
8. Marx K. (1968). Introduction. In: Marx K., Engels F. Collected works. 2nd ed., Vol. 46, part 1. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russian).
9. Montesquieu (1999). De l’esprit des lois. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian).
10. Petty W. (1940a). Verbum sapienti. In: Petty W. Economic and statistical works. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, pp. 79—153. (In Russian).
11. Petty W. (1940b). Political arithmetick. In: Petty W. Economic and statistical works. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, pp. 154—205. (In Russian).
12. Smith A. (2007). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Moscow: Eksmo. (In Russian).
13. Schumpeter J. A. (2001). History of economic analysis. St. Petersburg: Ekonomicheskaya Shkola. (In Russian).
14. Hume D. (1996). A treatise of human nature. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian).
15. Hume D. (1996). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian).
16. Hume D. (1996 [1752]). Of commerce. In: Hume D. Small works. Moscow: Kanon, pp. 66—82. (In Russian).
17. Bobbio N. (1993). Thomas Hobbes and the natural law tradition. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
18. Burton J. H. (1846). Life and correspondence of David Hume, Vol. I. Edinburgh: W. Tait.
19. Cantillon R. (2015 [1755]). Richard Cantillon’s essay on the nature of trade in general: A variorum edition. London: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315794686
20. Coleman W. O. (1995). Rationalism and anti-rationalism in the origins of economics. The philosophical roots of 18th century economic thought. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
21. Cook H. J. (2007). Matters of exchange: Commerce, medicine, and science in the Dutch golden age. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
22. Cook H. J. (2012). Moving about and finding things out: Economies and sciences in the period of the scientific revolution. Osiris, Vol. 27, No. 1, рр. 101—132. https://doi.org/10.1086/667824
23. Faccarello G. (1999). The foundations of ‘laissez-faire’: The economics of Pierre de Boisguilbert. London: Routledge.
24. Finkelstein A. L. (2000). Harmony and the balance: An intellectual history of seventeenth-century English economic thought. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
25. Groenewegen P. (2002). Eighteen century economics: Turgot, Beccaria and Smith and their contemporaries. London and New York: Routledge.
26. Hengstmengel J. W. (2019). Divine providence in early modern economic thought. London and New York: Routledge.
27. Henry J. (2017). Enlarging the bounds of moral philosophy: Why did Isaac Newton conclude the Optics the way he did? Notes and Records. The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, Vol. 71, No. 1, рр. 21—39. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2016.0011
28. Hobbes T. (1965 [1651]). Hobbes’s Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29. Hume D. (1784 [1752]). Of refinement in the arts. In: Hume D. Essays and treatises on several subjects: Essays moral, political, and literary, Vol. 1. London, pp. 285—298.
30. Humphrey T. M. (1993). The origins of velocity functions. Economic Quarterly, Vol. 79, No. 4, рр. 1—17.
31. Ito S. (2011). The making of institutional credit in England, 1600 to 1688. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 487—519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560903552595
32. Johnson E. A. J. (1932). British mercantilist doctrines concerning the “exportation of work” and “foreign-paid incomes”. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 750—770. https://doi.org/10.1086/254405
33. Leng T. (2013). Expertise and knowledge in the world of commerce. In: P. J. Stern, C. Wennerlind (eds.). Mercantilism reimagined: Political economy in early modern Britain and its empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Letwin W. (2003 [1963]). The origins of scientific economics. English economic thought: 1660—1776. Reprint. London and New York: Routledge.
35. Letwin W. (1972). The economic foundations of Hobbes’ politics. In: M. Cranston, R. S. Peters (eds.). Hobbes and Rousseau. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, рp. 143—164.
36. McCulloch J. R. (1845). Literature of political economy: A classified catalogue of select publications in the different departments of that science with historical, critical, and biographical notices. London: Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans.
37. Magnusson L. (1994). Mercantilism. The shaping of an economic language. London and New York: Routledge.
38. Malynes G. de (1623). The center of the circle of commerce. London: W. Jones.
39. Mirowski P. (1989). More heat than light: Economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Misselden E. (1623). The circle of commerce. Or the balance of trade, in defence of free trade. London: J. Dawson.
41. Murphy A. E. (2008). The genesis of macroeconomics: New ideas from Sir William Petty to Henry Thornton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Murphy A. E. (2018a). John Law: A twenty-first century banker in the eighteenth century? In: L. Costabile, L. Neal (eds.). Financial innovation and resilience. A comparative perspective on the public banks of Naples (1462—1808). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90248-7_12
43. Murphy A. E. (2018b). The first financial market bubble: Perspectives from John Law and Richard Cantillon. In: R. Kuroki, Y. Ando (eds.). The foundations of political economy and social reform. Economy and society in eighteenth century France. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 6—23. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315188058-1
44. Nokkala E., Miller N. D. (2020). Introduction. In: Cameralism and the enlightenment. Happiness, governance and reform in transnational perspective. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1—20. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429343551-1
45. Orain A. (2014). The second Jansenism and the rise of French eighteenth-century political economy. History of Political Economy, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 463—490. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2796233.
46. Pribram K. (1983). A history of economic reasoning. Baltimore and London. The John Hopkins University Press.
47. Redman D. (1996). Sir James Steuart’s statesman revisited in light of the continent influence. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 43, No. 1, рр. 48—70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1996.tb00838.x
48. Reinert E. S., Daastøl A. M. (1997). Exploring the genesis of economic innovations: The religious gestalt-switch and the duty to invent as preconditions for economic growth. European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 233—283. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008631410924
49. Sakamoto T. (2008). Hume’s economic theory. In: E. S. Radcliffe (ed.). A companion to Hume. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 373—387.
50. Shank J. B. (2008). The Newton wars and the beginning of the French Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Shank J. B. (2014). Science. In: D. Brewer (ed.). The Cambridge companion to the French Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60—77. https:// doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139108959.006
52. Steuart Sir J. (1767). An inquiry into the principles of political еconomy: Being an essay on the science of domestic policy in free nations. Vol. I. London: Millar and Cadell.
53. Tribe K. (2007). Strategies of economic order. German economic discourse 1750—1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Viner J. (1930). English theories of foreign trade before Adam Smith. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 249—301. https://doi.org/10.1086/254107
55. Viner J. (1978). Religious thought and economic society: Four chapters of an unfinished work. History of Political Economy, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1—189.
Review
For citations:
Ananyin О.I. How has economic science emerged: Competition of blueprints. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2023;(3):5-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-3-5-23
Views:
891
Email this article 
