Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Modeling of the corporate capital structure

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-6-62-75

Abstract

The capital structure is determined by the ratio of the company’s own and borrowed funds. It has a direct impact on the financial stability of the company, profit and return on equity. Thus a reasonable calculation of the value of the specified ratio is an urgent problem for any large enterprise. The correct ratio of borrowed and own capital in the structure of the aggregate corporate capital will allow to provide the specified return from the use of own capital in changing market conditions. The methodology of optimizing the structure of capital proposed by the authors is based on a formula for increasing return on equity (ROE) as a function of three variables — return on sales (ROS), resource productivity (Y) and equity multiplier M. The interpretation of the DuPont model as a model with lagged variables is original, which allows to predict the change in the equity multiplier at the expense of possible increase in other variables: resource productivity and return on sales, provided that the return on equity will reach the target level. There have been obtained formulas which allow modeling the structure of capital that guarantees a given profitability. The heuristic principle based on the three-factor model of DuPont ROE = ROS×Y×M, was that keeping the return on equity at the same level (as compared with the reference period) should entail compensation for the multidirectional dynamics of return on sales, resource productivity and equity multiplier. The paper considers three variants of the dependence of changes in the ratio of equity and borrowed capital of the company: when resource productivity is unchanged (ΔY = 0), when return on sales is unchanged (ΔROS = 0) and when both indicators change simultaneously (ΔY ≠ 0 and ΔROS ≠ 0). The methodology presented by the authors also allows to calculate the structure of capital which would provide a given level of return on equity ROE based on the forecast of return on assets ROS and return on sales Y with reference to the values of ROS and Y calculated in the reference period. We present the testing of this algorithm (in all three variants) on the basis of the reporting data of one of the metallurgical companies of Russia for the period 2017—2019.

About the Authors

E. G. Demidova
Ugarov Stary Oskol Technological Institute (branch) of MISIS University
Russian Federation

Elena G. Demidova

Stary Oskol



E. M. Bogatov
Ugarov Stary Oskol Technological Institute (branch) of MISIS University; Gubkin Branch of MISIS University
Russian Federation

Egor М. Bogatov

Stary Oskol; Gubkin 



References

1. Anokhin E. V., Anokhin V. A., Kasatova Z. V. (2014). Analysis of scientific approaches to marketing research. Economic Analysis: Тheory and Рractice, No. 23, pp. 17—27. (In Russian).

2. Bogatov E. M., Demidova E. G. (2022). On the application of the increment formula in the theory of capital structure. D.A. Zakora (ed.). Collection of materials of the international conference KROMSH-2022. Simferopol: Arial, p. 62. (In Russian).

3. Brusov P. N., Filatova T. V., Orekhova N. P. (2013). Is there an optimal capital structure in the well-known theory of compromise? Finance and Сredit, No. 30, pp. 20—43. (In Russian).

4. Brusov P. N., Filatova T. V., Orekhova N. P. (2014). The mechanism of formation of the optimal capital structure of the company, different from that proposed by the traditional theory of compromise. Finance and Сredit, No. 21, pp. 2—15. (In Russian).

5. Zadorozhnaya A. N. (2015). Theoretical and practical aspects of the formation of the optimal capital structure of the company. Omsk: YNZ. (In Russian).

6. Kirshin I. A. (2016). Method of optimizing the capital structure of the company taking into account the costs of financial difficulties. Financial Management, No. 2, pp. 69—76. (In Russian).

7. Kirshin I. A., Sibgatova I. I., Evrasova A. N., Sadykova A. E. (2017). Methodological foundations of optimization of the capital structure of the firm in the theories of the capital structure. Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, Vol. 7, No. 5А, pp. 112—123. (In Russian).

8. Kremer H. S. (ed.). (2010). Higher mathematics for economists: А textbook for university students studying economics, 3rd ed. Moscow. Unity-Dana. (In Russian).

9. Likhutin P. N., Savchenko A. A. (2017). Determination of essential factors in decomposition of return on equity. Vestnik NSUEM, No. 1, pp. 146—161. (In Russian).]

10. МMakarova S. G., Velikorossovа E. N. (2014). Features of the formation of the capital structure of companies in various sectors of the Russian economy. Audit and Financial Analysis, No. 2, pp. 425—438. (In Russian).

11. Nikitushkina I. V., Makarova S. G. (eds.) (2013). Corporate capital structure: Theory and practice. Moscow: Economic Faculty of Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russian).

12. Romitsyna G. A., Romanovskaya N. N. (2015). Assessment of the impact of the capital structure on the profitability of the company. Izvestiya Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences, No. 3, pp. 110—115. (In Russian).

13. Rusanova E. G. (2011). Development of the theory of capital structure after Modigliani and Miller. Finance and Credit, No. 4, pp. 60—67. (In Russian).

14. Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, No. 5, pp. 992—1026. https://doi.org/10.1086/261849

15. Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascads. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 151—170. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.3.151

16. Diamond D. (1989). Reputation acquisition in debt markets. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 97, No. 4, pp. 828—862. https://doi.org/10.1086/261630

17. Hamada R. (1969). Portfolio analysis, market equilibrium, and corporate finance. Journal of Finance, Vo. 24, No. 1, pp. 11—13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1969.tb00339.x

18. Hirshleifer D., Thakor А. (1992). Managerial conservatism, project choice and debt. Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 437—470. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/5.3.437

19. Jensen М. C., Meckling W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 305—360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

20. Kraus A., Litzenberger R.H. (1973). A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. Journal of Finance, Vol. 28. No. 4, pp. 911—922. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01415.x

21. Modigliani F., Miller M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporate finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 261—297.

22. Myers S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 575—592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x

23. Myers S. C., Majluf N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 187—221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Demidova E.G., Bogatov E.M. Modeling of the corporate capital structure. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2023;(6):62-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-6-62-75

Views: 725


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)