|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
The distributional impacts of the COVID-19 crisis and policy response in Russia
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-2-43-60
Abstract
The outbreak of COVID-19 has had severe negative economic impacts on households and businesses in Russia. Russia’s GDP declined by 2,7% in 2020. To mitigate the adverse impacts of the pandemic, in March—June 2020 the govern- ment implemented a number of fiscal and social policy measures aimed at support- ing businesses, employment and incomes of vulnerable groups of the population. This paper presents the results of the impact assessment of the COVID-19 crisis and the related policy interventions on the income distribution and poverty in Russia in 2020. The analysis is based on the tax-benefit microsimulation model for Russia, which allows for assessing the redistributive effects of direct and indirect taxes and transfers in Russia at the federal and regional levels. We find that the net effect of the crisis and policy interventions was strongly progressive at the bottom of the income distribution and equalizing across regions.
About the Authors
S. Freije
The World Bank
United States
United States
Wadhington
M. S. Matytsin
The World Bank
United States
United States
Wadhington
D. O. Popova
University of Essex; HSE University
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Colchester
Moscow
References
1. Almeida V., Barrios S., Christl M., De Poli S., Tumino A., van der Wielen W. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on households’ income in the EU. Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 19, pp. 413—431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-021-09485-8
2. Avellaneda A., Chang R., Collado D., Jara H. X., Mideros A., Montesdeoca L., Rodríguez D., Torres J., Vanegas O. (2021). Assessing the cushioning effect of tax-benefit policies in the Andean region during the COVID-19 pandemic. CeMPA Working Paper, No. 8/21. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.
3. Beirne K., Doorley K., Regan M., Roantree B., Tuda D. (2020). The potential costs and distributional effect of Covid-19 related unemployment in Ireland. EUROMOD Working Paper, No. EM05/20. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.
4. Brewer M., Tasseva I. V. (2021). Did the UK policy response to COVID-19 protect household incomes? Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 19, pp. 433—458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-021-09491-w
5. Cantу O., Figari F., Fiorio C. V., Kuypers S., Marchal S., Romaguera-de-la-Cruz M., Tasseva I. V., Verbist G. (2022). Welfare resilience at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in a selection of European countries: Impact on public finance and household incomes. Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 293—322. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12530
6. Christl M., De Poli S., Figari F., Hufkens T., Leventi C., Papini A., Tumino A. (2022a). Monetary compensation schemes during the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for household incomes, liquidity constraints and consumption across the EU. JRC Working Papers on Taxation and Structural Reforms, No. 03/2022. Seville: European Commission, Joint Research Centre.
7. Christl M., De Poli S., Kucsera D., Lorenz H. (2022b). COVID-19 and (gender) inequality in income: Тhe impact of discretionary policy measures in Austria. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 158, article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41937-022-00084-6
8. Figari F., Fiorio C. (2020). Welfare resilience in the immediate aftermath of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. EUROMOD Working Papers, No. EM6/20. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.
9. Fuchs A., Matytsin M., Nozaki N.K., Popova D. (2021). Distributional impacts of taxes and benefits in post-Soviet countries. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9795
10. Jara H. X., Montesdeoca L., Tasseva I. (2022). The role of automatic stabilizers and emergency tax—benefit policies during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Ecuador. European Journal of Development Research, Vol. 34, pp. 2787—2809. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00490-1
11. Kakwani N. C. (1977). Measurement of tax progressivity: An international comparison. Economic Journal, Vol. 87, No. 345, pp. 71—80. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231833
12. López-Calva L. F., Lustig N., Matytsin M., Popova D. (2017). Who benefits from fiscal redistribution in the Russian Federation? In: G. Inchauste, N. Lustig (eds.). The distributional impact of taxes and transfers: Evidence from eight developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 199—233. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1091-6_ch7
13. Matytsin M., Popova D., Freije S. (2019). RUSMOD: A tool for distributional analysis in the Russian Federation. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 8994. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8994
14. Ovcharova L., Biryukova S. (2018). Poverty and the poor in post-Soviet Russia. In: N. Hatti, D. Rauhut (eds.). Poverty, politics and the poverty of politics. New Delhi: BR Publishing Corporation, pp. 151—175.
15. Ovcharova L., Popova D. (2005). Child poverty in Russia. Alarming trends and policy options. Moscow: UNICEF.
16. Popova D. (2012). Constructing the tax-benefit microsimulation model for Russia — RUSMOD. EUROMOD Working Paper, No. EM7/12. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.
17. Popova D. (2013). Impact assessment of alternative reforms of child allowances using RUSMOD — the static tax-benefit microsimulation model for Russia. International Journal of Microsimulation, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 122—156. https://doi.org/10.34196/IJM.00079
18. Popova D. (2016). Distributional impacts of cash allowances for children: A microsimulation analysis for Russia and Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 248—267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716645074
19. Popova D., Matytsin M., Sinnot E. (2018). Distributional impact of taxes and social transfers in Russia over the downturn. Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 535—548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718767608
20. Sutherland H., Figari F. (2013) EUROMOD: Тhe European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model. International Journal of Microsimulation, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 4—26. https://doi.org/10.34196/IJM.00075
21. UNICEF (2011). The situation analysis of children in the Russian Federation: Оn the way to the equal opportunity society. Moscow: UNICEF.
22. World Bank (2020). Russia’s economy loses momentum amidst COVID-19 resurgence; awaits relief from vaccine. Russia Economic Report, No. 44. Washington, DC: World Bank.
23. World Bank (2021). Amidst strong economic recovery, risks stemming from COVID-19 and inflation build. Russia Economic Report, No. 46. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Freije S., Matytsin M.S., Popova D.O. The distributional impacts of the COVID-19 crisis and policy response in Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2023;(2):43-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-2-43-60
Views:
1235
Email this article 
