Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Is the Russian system of compulsory health insurance an insurance one?

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-8-32-47

Abstract

The subject of the article is a discussion of the grounds for qualifying the system of compulsory health insurance (CHI) created in Russia as an insurance system, which is questioned by many experts. The article sys tematizes theoretical and methodological approaches to the description of social health insurance systems. A comparative analysis of the evolution of national systems of compulsory health insurance and systems of budgetary financing of health care was carried out from the standpoint of considering institutional changes as strengthening or weakening three types of regulation (state, societal, private), which ensure the performance of the functions of revenue collection, pooling of funds, purchasing of services. On this basis, general characteristics of modern models of social health insurance, which distinguish them from budgetary systems, are highlighted. The Russian CHI system can be qualified as a social insurance system in terms of the formation and pooling of financial resources, but as a hybrid, combining elements of the insurance and budgetary systems, in terms of the purchase of medical care.

About the Author

S. V. Shishkin
HSE University
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Shishkin

Moscow

 



References

1. Gontmakher E. S. (2016). Health protection: World trends and experience of Russia. In: E. S. Gontmakher, I. V. Grishin, I. P. Tsapenko (eds.). Social context of economic development in the 21st century. Moscow: IMEMO RAN, pp. 78—92. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/978-5-9535-0473-7

2. Komarov Y. M. (ed.) (2013). The main provisions of the strategy for protecting the health of the population of the Russian Federation for the period 2013—2020 and subsequent years. Moscow: Civil Initiatives Committee. (In Russian).

3. Kravchenko V. V., Shatalin E. V. (2014). Outcomes of reforming the CHI system in 2010—2013. Analysis of the shortcomings of the existing CHI system. Health Manager, No. 3, pp. 6—19. (In Russian).

4. Nazarov V. S., Avksentiev N. A., Sisigina N. N. (2019). The main directions of development of the healthcare system in Russia: Тrends, forks, scenarios. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).

5. Chubarova T. (2009). The health care system in Russia: Еconomic issues of theory and practice. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 129—144. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/00428736-2009-4-129-144

6. Shishkin S. V., Sheiman I. M., Potapchik E. G., Ponkratova O. F. (2019). Analysis of the state of insurance medicine in Russia and the prospects for its development. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).

7. Abel-Smith B. (1988). The rise and decline of the early HMOs: Some international experiences. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Vol. 66, No. 6, pp. 694—719. https://doi.org/10.2307/3349936

8. Barr N. (1987). The economics of welfare state. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

9. Böhm K., Schmid A., Götze R., Landwehr C., Rothgang H. (2012). Classifying OECD healthcare systems: A deductive approach. TranState Working Papers, No. 165. University of Bremen.

10. Burau V., Blank R. H. (2006). Comparing health policy: An assessment of typologies of health systems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 63—76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980500513558

11. De Carvalho G., Schmid A., Fischer J. (2020) Classifications of health care systems: Do existing typologies reflect the particularities of the global south? Global Social Policy, Vol. 1, No. 23, pp. 654—758. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018120969315

12. Elola J. (1996). Health care system reforms in western European countries: Тhe relevance of health care organization. International Journal of Health Services, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 239—251. https://doi.org/10.2190/TC9K-VQBR-NR64-AGVQ Feldstein P. (1979). Health care economics. New York: Wiley.

13. Freeman R., Frisina L. (2010). Health care systems and the problem of classification. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol. 12, No. 1—2, pp. 163—178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980903076278

14. Gerlinger T., Schmucker R. (2009). A long farewell to the Bismarck system: Incremental change in the German health insurance system. German Policy Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 3—20.

15. Giaimo S., Manow P. (1999). Adapting the welfare state: The case of health care reform in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 967—1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414099032008003

16. Hassenteufel P., Palier B. (2007). Towards neo-Bismarckian health care states? Comparing health insurance reforms in Bismarckian welfare systems. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 574—596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679515.2007.00573.x

17. Kutzin J. (2001). A descriptive framework for country-level analysis of health care financing arrangements. Health Policy, Vol. 56, No. 3, рр. 171—204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(00)00149-4

18. Moran M. (1999). Governing the health care state. A comparative study of the United Kingdom, the United States and Germany. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

19. Rice T., Rosenau P., Unruh L. Y., Barnes A. J., van Ginneken E. (2020). United States of America. Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, Vol. 22, No. 4.

20. Rico A., Saltman R. B., Boerma W.G.W. (2003). Organizational restructuring in European health systems: The role of primary care. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 592—608. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00360

21. Rothgang H., Cacace M., Grimmeisen S., Wendt C. (2005). The changing role of the state in healthcare systems. European Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 187—212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798705000256

22. Rothgang H., Cacace M., Frisina L., Grimmeisen S., Schmid A., Wendt C. (2010). The state and healthcare: Comparing OECD countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

23. Saltman R. B., Busse R., Figueras J. (eds.) (2004). Social health insurance systems in Western Europe. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

24. Schmid A., Cacace M., Götze R., Rothgang H. (2010). Explaining health care system change: Problem pressure and the emergence of “hybrid” health care systems. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 455—486. https:// doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2010

25. Tuohy C. H. (1999). Accidental logics — The dynamics of change in the health care arena in the United States, Britain, and Canada. New York: Oxford University Press.

26. Van der Zee J., Kroneman M.W. (2007). Bismarck or Beveridge: A beauty contest between dinosaurs. BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 94, No. 7, pp. 318—398. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-94

27. Wendt C., Frisina L., Rothgang H. (2009). Healthcare system types: A conceptual framework for comparison. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 70—90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00647.x

28. Wendt C., Grimmeisen S., Helmert U., Rothgang H., Cacace M. (2004). Convergence or divergence of OECD health care systems. TranState Working Papers, No. 9. University of Bremen.

29. WHO (2019). Global spending on health: A world in transition. Geneva: World Health Organization.

30. WHO (2021). Spending on health in Europe: Еntering a new era. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.


Review

For citations:


Shishkin S.V. Is the Russian system of compulsory health insurance an insurance one? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2022;(8):32—47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-8-32-47

Views: 1031


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)