Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Paternalistic state: Academic science and scientific journals
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-9-139-157
Abstract
The paper is prefaced by the statement that a paternalistic state was not invented by anyone and is a result of an endogenous process of society development, at different phases of which the state can generate both positive and negative consequences. In this context, the paper justifies the fallacy of the state’s decision to reorganize the Russian Academy of Sciences by escalating bureaucratic interference in scientific life — using scientometric management methods and introducing an “effective contract” that brought forth a “waterfall” of worthless articles and predatory journals. In order to eliminate “scientometric failure” the paper proposes recommendations on science reforming based on principally new view on the processes of knowledge production as a public good and its transformation into market products with an emphasis on one of the branches of this transformation — scientific articles publication. The theoretical result has served as a platform for the development of institutional modernization of the knowledge distribution system, according to which the authors for an appropriate fee may grant the right to use their scientific texts for publication in journals. The revenues of journals should come from two sources: the sale of journals at market prices consistent with the individual utility of publishing products, and a budget subsidy consistent with the social utility of journals’ knowledge dissemination services. The implementation of this reform implies state funding of scientific journals and targeted subsidies to scientific libraries of universities and academic institutions to pay for subscriptions to major scientific journals.
About the Author
A. Y. Rubinstein
Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander Y. Rubinstein
Moscow
References
1. Balatsky E., Ekimova N. (2015). The experience of ranking Russian economic journals. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 8, pp. 99—115. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-8-99-115
2. Blaug M. (1994). Economic thought in retrospect. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).
3. Weber M. (2017). Economy and society. Essays on understanding sociology. Communities. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).
4. Gokhberg L. M. (еd.) (2012). Knowledge economy in terms of statistics: Science, technology, innovation, education, information society: Glossary. Moscow: Ekonomika. (In Russian).
5. Ivanova N. I. (2002). National innovation systems. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
6. Makarov V. L. (2003). Knowledge economy: Lessons for Russia. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 73, No. 5, pр. 450—456. (In Russian).
7. Makarov V. L., Kleiner G. B. (2007). Microeconomics of knowledge. Moscow: Ekonomika. (In Russian).
8. Mastepanov A. M. (2020). Once again about publishing activity in scientific journals. Problemy Ekonomiki i Upravleniya Neftegazovym Kompleksom, Nо. 9, рp. 5—6. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.33285/1999-6942-2020-11(191)-5-6
9. Machlup F. (1966). Knowledge production and dissemination in the USA. Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).
10. Mises L. von (2006). Bureaucracy. Chelyabinsk: Socium. (In Russian).
11. Milner B. Z. (еd.) (2009). Innovative development. Economics, intellectual resources, knowledge management. Moscow: Infra-M. (In Russian).
12. Polterovich V. (2022). Bibliometric equilibrium. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, Vol. 92, No. 5, pp. 431—439. (In Russian).
13. Rubinstein A. (2009). Meritorics and economic sociodynamics: Debates with R. Musgrave. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 98—109. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-11-98-109
14. Rubinstein A. Y. (2018). The theory of patronized goods. St. Petersburg: Aletheia. (In Russian).
15. Rubinstein A. Y. (2021). State paternalism: From science to scientometrics. Journal of Institutional Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 20—36. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.3.020-036
16. Rubinshtein A. Y., Gorodetsky A. E. (2018). State paternalism and paternalist failure in the theory of patronized goods. Journal of Institutional Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 38—57. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2018.10.4.038-057
17. Rubinshtein A. Y., Gorodetsky A. E., Grinberg R. S. (eds.) (2020). Economic theory of the state: A new paradigme of paternalism. St. Petersburg: Aletheia. (In Russian).
18. Rubtsov A. V. (еd.) (2016). Ideas and numbers. Foundations and criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of philosophical and socio-humanitarian research. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. (In Russian).
19. Shipovalova L. V. (2014). Citation index and objectivity of experts (An attempt at philosophizing on the subject). Higher Education in Russia, No. 2, pp. 119—125. (In Russian).
20. Akerlof G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 488—500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
21. Antonelli C. (1999). The evolution of the industrial organization of the production of knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 243—260. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/23.2.243
22. Appleyard M. (1996). How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. S2, рp. 137—154. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171112
23. Arrow K. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 155—173. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952
24. Arrow K. J., Debreu G. (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 265—290. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907353
25. Baumol W. (1967). Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review, Vol. 57, рp. 415—442.
26. Baumol W. J., Bowen W. G. (1966). Performing arts: The economic dilemma. A study of problems common to theatre, opera, music and dance. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
27. Baumol W. (1987). Performing arts. In: J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman (eds.). The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics. London: Macmillan.
28. Coase R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 1—44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560
29. David P. (1993). Knowledge, property and the system dynamics of technological change. In: Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1992. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 215—248.
30. David P. (1998). Common agency contracting and the emergence of open science institutions. American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 15—21.
31. Foray D. (2004). The economics of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Foray D., Mairesse J. (1998). Innovations et performances des firms: Approaches interdisciplinarians. Paris: EHESS.
33. Hayek F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 519—530.
34. Lindahl E. (1958). Just taxation — a positive solution. In: R. A. Musgrave, A. T. Peacock (eds.). Classics in the theory of public finance. London: MacMillan, pp. 168—176.
35. Machlup F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36. Machlup F. (1984). Knowledge, its creation, distribution and economic significance, Vol. III. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37. Maunoury J.-L. (1972). Economie du savoir. Paris: Armand Colin.
38. Musgrave R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: A study in public economy. New York: McGraw Hill.
39. Neck R., Getzner M. (2007). Austrian government expenditures: “Wagner’s law” or “Baumol’s disease”? International Business & Economics Research Journal, Vol. 6, No. 11, pp. 49—66. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v6i11.3428
40. Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. Nordhaus W. (2008). Baumol’s diseases: A macroeconomic perspective. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 8, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1690.1382
41. Olson M. (1986). Toward a more theory of governmental structure. Budget reform and of theory of fiscal federalism. American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 120—125.
42. Pickhardt M. (2001). Club goods and the dichotomy of public versus private goods. Paper presented at the 57th IIPF Congress, Linz, August 27—30, and the Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Paris, April 18—21.
43. Pigou A. (1932). The economics of welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan.
44. Samuelson P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 387—389. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895
45. Samuelson P. A. (1969). Pure theory of public expenditure and taxation. In: J. Margolis, H. Guitton (eds.). Public economics. London: MacMillan, pp. 98—123.
46. Simon H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason, Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Wagner A. (1892). Grundlegung der politischen Oekonomie. Aufl. 1, Theil 2. Leipzig: Halbband.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Rubinstein A.Y. Paternalistic state: Academic science and scientific journals. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2022;(9):139-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-9-139-157
Views:
724
Email this article 
