Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Wages and labor market flows in times of the corona crisis
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-2-69-94
Abstract
The paper discusses two major dimensions of labor market adjustment to crisis conditions in Russia in 2020. Price adjustment manifests itself through changes in wages, and quantitative adjustment — in hiring and separations. Most general conclusion is that, in 2020, the former dominated, while the latter also took place. Our analysis shows deep but very selective and short run fall in wages. Exposure to downward wage flexibility was a function of type of economic activity and type of residence, not of demographic characteristics or education. Freezing new hires became the main instrument for quantitative adjustment, though the intensity of separations decreased as well. Reduction in both components of labor turnover means slower workers’ reallocation and preservation of the old economic structure. If during the previous crises legislative and administrative measures slowed down reductions in personnel, which could be beneficial for employers, in the covid case employers seek to preserve the matching capital needed for fast and efficient recovery and growth.
About the Author
V. E. Gimpelson
HSE University;
Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir E. Gimpelson
Moscow
References
1. Gimpelson V. E., Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2015). Russian model of labour market: Testing by crisis. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 2, pp. 249—254. (In Russian).
2. Gimpelson V., Kapeliushnikov R. (2020a). The economy in quarantine and labour market. Econs, June 2. (In Russian).] https://econs.online/articles/ekonomika/karantinnaya-ekonomika-i-rynok-truda/
3. Gimpelson V., Kapeliushnikov R. (2020b). Covidization of the Russian labour market. Econs, July 16. (In Russian).] https://econs.online/articles/opinions/kovidizatsiya-rossiyskogo-rynka-truda/
4. Gimpelson V. E., Kapeliushnikov R. I., Sharunina A. V. (2016). “The roads we choose”: Movements in the external and internal labor market (Preprint No. WP3/2016/02). Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).
5. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2013). Informal employment in Russia: What do alternative definitions tell us? Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 4, pp. 52—83. (In Russian).
6. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2022). The anatomy of the corona crisis through the lens of the labor market adjustment. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 2, pp. 33—68. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-2-33-68
7. Lukianova A. (2021). Passive and active labour market policies on the Russian labour market. Mimeo, HSE CLMS. (In Russian).
8. Hairault J.-O., Le Barbanchon T., Sopraseuth T. (2015). The cyclicality of the separation and job finding rates in France. European Economic Review, Vol. 76, pp. 60—84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.01.013
9. Fujita S., Ramey G. (2009). The cyclicality of separation and job finding rates. International Economic Review, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 415—430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2009.00535.x
10. Gimpelson V. (2019). The labor market in Russia, 2000—2017. IZA World of Labor, No. 466, pp. 1—13. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.466
11. Gimpelson V., Kapeliushnikov R. (2013). Labor market adjustment: Is Russia different? In: S. Weber, M. V. Alexeev (eds.). The Oxford handbook of the Russian economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 693—724.
12. Lehmann H., Zaiceva A. (2015). Re-defining informal employment: Evidence from the Russian labour market. Journal of International Development, Vol. 27, pp. 464—488. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3062
13. Shimer R. (2005). The cyclical behavior of equilibrium unemployment and vacancies. American Economic Review, Vol. 95, No. 1, pp. 25—49. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828572
14. Wadsworth J. (2020). Labour markets in the time of coronavirus: Measuring excess. IZA Paper Series, No. 13529.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Gimpelson V.E. Wages and labor market flows in times of the corona crisis. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2022;(2):69-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-2-69-94
Views:
1565
Email this article 
