Открытый доступ
Только для подписчиков
Качество институтов: проблемы определения и оценки
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-7-49-67
Аннотация
Анализируются современные представления о понятии качества институтов и формулируется его обобщенное и операциональное понимание. Обоснована трактовка качества института как его легитимности с точки зрения стейкхолдеров последнего. Легитимность объекта или процесса понимается как признание его права на существование, предложена примерная форма вопроса при социологической оценке качества институтов. Обосновано эволюционное определение понятия качества и показано, что идентификация качества институтов с их легитимностью вполне ему соответствует.
Об авторе
В. Л. Тамбовцев
МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова
Россия
Россия
Тамбовцев Виталий Леонидович, доктор экономических наук, проф экономического факультета
Москва
Список литературы
1. Акиндинова Н., Алексашенко С., Петроневич А., Петроневич М. (2011). Сколько стоят неработающие институты? // Вопросы экономики. № 8. С. 41—65. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2011-8-41-65
2. Вахтина М. А. (2015). Состояние легитимности институтов современной России: к вопросу о роли социальной справедливости в экономике // Мир России. Т. 24, № 4. C. 60—71.
3. Вольчик В. В., Бережной И. В. (2007). Группы интересов и качество экономических институтов // Экономический вестник Ростовского государственного университета. Т. 5, № 2. С. 57—66.
4. Гурвич Е. Т. (2017). Институциональные рамки и экономическое развитие // Общественные науки и современность. № 1. С. 20—45.
5. Морозова Т. В., Козырева Г. Б. (2015). Качество институциональной среды сельских территорий России // Север и рынок: формирование экономического порядка. № 1. С. 83—93. [
6. Подшивалова М. В. (2019). Экономико-математическая модель институционального опциона как новый подход к оценке качества институтов // Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Сер. «Экономика и менеджмент». Т. 13, № 1. С. 63—69. https://doi.org/10.14529/em190207
7. Полтерович В. М., Попов В. В. (2007). Демократизация и экономический рост // Общественные науки и современность. № 2. C. 13—27.
8. Попов В. (2015). В поисках новых источников роста. Догоняют ли развивающиеся страны развитые? // Вопросы экономики. № 10. С. 30—53. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-10-30-53
9. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Adams N. P. (2020). Legitimacy and institutional purpose. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 292—310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1565712
11. Agnafors M. (2013). Quality of government: Toward a more complex definition. American Political Science Review, Vol. 107, No. 3, pp. 433—445. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000191
12. Alonso J. A., Garcimartín C. (2013). The determinants of institutional quality. More on the debate. Journal of International Development, Vol. 25, No. 2, рр. 206—226. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1710
13. Alonso R. G. (2013). Why deliberation? Challenges for an epistemic model of democratic legitimacy. Papel Politico, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 185—203.
14. Alvarez A. (1919). The state’s right of self-preservation. Washington University Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 113—126.
15. Álvarez I. C., Barbero J., Rodríguez-Pose A., Zofío J. L. (2018). Does institutional quality matter for trade? Institutional conditions in a sectoral trade framework. World Development, Vol. 103, pp. 72—87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.010
16. Álvarez-Díaz M., Miguez G. C. (2008). The quality of institutions: A genetic programming approach. Economic Modelling, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 161—169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2007.05.001
17. Aslin R. N., Newport E. L. (2012). Statistical learning: From acquiring specific items to forming general rules. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 170—176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412436806
18. Balcerzak A. P. (2020). Quality of institutions in the European Union countries. Application of TOPSIS based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, Vol. 17, No. 1, рр. 101—122. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.17.1.2020.1.6
19. Balcerzak A. P., Pietrzak M. B. (2016). Quality of institutions for knowledge-based economy within new institutional economics framework. Multiple criteria decision analysis for European countries in the years 2000—2013. Economics and Sociology, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 66—81. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/4
20. Berggren N., Bjørnskov C., Lipka D. (2015). Legitimacy and the cost of government. Public Choice, Vol. 162, No. 3/4, pp. 307—328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0224-9
21. Bitektine A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 151—179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0382
22. Bitektine A., Haack P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, рр. 49—75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0318
23. Bovens M., van Erp J., Douglas S., de Graaf B., Mak E., van den Bos K., de Dijn A., Gädeke D., van de Grift L., Nivette A. (2020). Institutional legitimacy in open societies. Utrecht University. Institutions for Open Societies. Think Paper Series, No. 2.
24. Calude C. S., Longo G. (2017). The deluge of spurious correlations in big data. Foundations of Science, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 595—612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-016-9489-4
25. Casciaro T. (1998). Seeing things clearly: Social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception. Social Networks, Vol. 20, No. 4, рр. 331—351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(98)00008-2
26. Chowdhury F., Audretsch D. B., Belitski M. (2019). Institutions and entrepreneurship quality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 51—81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718780431
27. Cunningham W. A., Zelazo P. D. (2007). Attitudes and evaluations: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 97—104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.005
28. Davis J. H., Ruhe J. A. (2003). Perceptions of country corruption: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 275—288. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023038901080
29. Díez-Martín F., Blanco-González A., Díez-de-Castro E. (2021). Measuring a scientifically multifaceted concept: The jungle of organizational legitimacy. European Research on Management and Business Economics, Vol. 27, No. 1, article 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.10.001
30. Djankov S., La Porta R., Lopez de Silanes F., Shleifer A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 117, No. 1, pp. 1—37. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399436
31. Finch D., Deephouse D., Varella P. (2015). Examining an individual’s legitimacy judgment using the value—attitude system: The role of environmental and economic values and source credibility. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 127, No. 2, pp. 265—281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2031-5
32. Galesic M., Olsson H., Rieskamp J. (2018). A sampling model of social judgment. Psychological Review, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp. 363—390. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000096
33. Garvin D. A. (1984). What does “product quality” really mean? Sloan Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 25—43.
34. Gilley B. (2006). The determinants of state legitimacy: Results for 72 countries. International Political Science Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 47—71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512106058634
35. Ginges J., Atran S., Medin D., Shikaki K. (2007). Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. PNAS, Vol. 104, No. 18, pp. 7357—7360. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701768104
36. Glaeser E. L., Shleifer A. (2003). The rise of the regulatory state. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 401—425. https://doi.org/10.1257/.41.2.401
37. Greene W. H. (1993). Econometric analysis. New York: Macmillan.
38. Gwartney J., Lawson R. (2003). The concept and measurement of economic freedom. European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 405—430. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00007-7
39. Haidar J. I. (2012). The impact of business regulatory reforms on economic growth. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 285—307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2012.05.004
40. Harvey L., Green D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 9—34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
41. Hayek F. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica: New Series, Vol. 4, No. 13, pp. 33—54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548786
42. Hechter M. (2009). Legitimacy in the modern world. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 279—288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209338793
43. Heckelman J. C., Stroup M. D. (2005). A comparison of aggregation methods for measures of economic freedom. European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 21, No. 4, рр. 953—966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.06.001
44. Hogarth R. M., Karelaia N. (2007). Heuristic and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments. Psychological Review, Vol. 114, No. 3, pp. 733—758. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.733
45. IMD (2000). World competitiveness yearbook. Lausanne: Institute of Management Development.
46. Islam R., Montenegro C. E. (2002). What determines the quality of institutions? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2764. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2764
47. Javed O. (2013). Determinants of institutional quality: A case study of IMF programme countries. MPRA Paper, No. 51409
48. Kaina V. (2008). Legitimacy, trust and procedural fairness: Remarks on Marcia Grimes’ study. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 510—521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00773.x
49. Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. (2011). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 220—246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046
50. Lall S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: An economic evaluation of the Global competitiveness report. World Development, Vol. 29, No. 9, pp. 1501—1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00051-1
51. Lehne J., Mo J., Plekhanov A. (2014). What determines the quality of economic institutions? Cross-country evidence. EBRD Working Paper, No. 171. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3121122
52. Levy D. J., Glimcher P. W. (2011). Comparing apples and oranges: Using rewardspecific and reward-general subjective value representation in the brain. Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 31, No. 41, pp. 14693—14707. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2218-11.2011
53. Levy D. J., Glimcher P. W. (2012). The root of all value: A neural common currency for choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 1027—1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.06.001
54. Levi M., Sacks A. (2009). Legitimating beliefs: Sources and indicators. Regulation & Governance, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 311—333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01066.x
55. Madni G. R. (2019). Probing institutional quality through ethnic diversity, income inequality and public spending. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 142, No. 2, pp. 581—595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1924-1
56. Malito D. V., Umbach G., Bhuta N. (eds.) (2018). The Palgrave handbook of indicators in global governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
57. Meyer J. W., Scott W. R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In: J. W. Meyer, W. R. Scott (eds.). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, рр. 199—215.
58. Mo P.-H. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 66—79. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2000.1703
59. Mobasseri S., Srivastava S. B., Carney D. R. (2017). Seeing social structure: Assessing the accuracy of interpersonal judgments about social networks. IRLE Working Paper, No. 106-16.
60. North D. C. (1984). Transaction costs, institutions, and economic history. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 140, No. 1, pp. 7—17.
61. Olaoye O., Aderajo O. (2020). Institutions and economic growth in ECOWAS: An investigation into the hierarchy of institution hypothesis (HIH). International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 47, No. 9, pp. 1081—1108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-10-2019-0630
62. Olson M. A., Kendrick R. V. (2008). Origins of attitudes. In: W. D. Crano, R. Prislin (eds.). Frontiers of social psychology. Attitudes and attitude change. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press, pp. 111—130.
63. Osman R. H., Mohamed S. E. (2012). Institutional quality and economic performance: New evidence from Sudan. British Journal of Advance Academic Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1—15.
64. Palazzo G., Scherer A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 71—88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9044-2
65. Popescu I. (2012). Institutional quality: Criteria, determinants and benefits. The Yearbook of the “GH. Zane” Institute of Economic Researches, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 59—65.
66. Rajkumar A. S., Swaroop V. (2008). Public spending and outcomes: Does governance matter? Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 96—111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.08.003
67. Reeves C. A., Bednar D. A. (1995). Quality as symphony. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 72—79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-8804(95)96939-E
68. Rey A., Minier L., Malassis R., Bogaerts L., Fagot J. (2019). Regularity extraction across species: Associative learning mechanisms shared by human and non-human primates. Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 573—586. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12343
69. Robinson P. H., Kurzban R., Jones O. D. (2007). The origins of shared intuitions of justice. Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 6, pp. 1633—1688.
70. Rodrik D., Subramanian A. (2003). The primacy of institutions (and what this does and does not mean). Finance and Development, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 31—34.
71. Rothstein B., Stolle D. (2008). The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 441—459. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041508X12911362383354
72. Rothstein B., Teorell J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial political institutions. Governance, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 165—190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
73. Saffran J. R., Kirkham N. Z. (2018). Infant statistical learning. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 69, pp. 181—203. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011805
74. Sala-i-Martin X., Artadi E. V. (2004). The Global Competitiveness Index. In: M. Porter, K. Schwab, X. Sala-i-Martin, A. López-Claros (eds.). Global competitiveness report 2004—2005. Geneva: Global Economic Forum, pp. 51—80.
75. Santolin C., Saffran J. R. (2018). Constraints on statistical learning across species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 1, рр. 52—63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.003
76. Sherman B. E., Graves K. N., Turk-Browne N. B. (2020). The prevalence and importance of statistical learning in human cognition and behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 32, рр. 15—20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.015
77. Siegelman N., Bogaerts L., Kronenfeld O., Frost R. (2018). Redefining “learning” in statistical learning: What does an online measure reveal about the assimilation of visual regularities? Cognitive Science, Vol. 42, No. S3, pp. 692—727. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12556
78. Sng O., Williams K. E. G., Neuberg S. L. (2017). Evolutionary approaches to stereotyping and prejudice. In: C. G. Sibley, F. K. Barlow (eds.). The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, рp. 21—46.
79. Spiegler P., Milberg W. (2009). The taming of institutions in economics: The rise and methodology of the ‘new new institutionalism’. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 289—313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137409990026
80. Straub S. (2000). Empirical determinants of good institutions: Do we know anything? IDB Working Paper, No. 423. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1817222
81. Sturm J.-E., De Haan J. (2001). How robust is the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth? Applied Economics, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 839—844. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840121977
82. Suchman M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 571—610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
83. Suddendorf T., Corballis M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 299—313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001975
84. Swenson G. (2018). Legal pluralism in theory and practice. International Studies Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 438—462. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix060
85. Teorell J. (2009). The impact of quality of government as impartiality: Theory and evidence. QoG Working Paper Series, No. 2009:25, University of Gothenburg.
86. Tost L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 686—710. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.65554690
87. Turk-Browne N. B., Junge J. A., Scholl B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 134, No. 4, pp. 552—564. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552
88. Turk-Browne N. B., Scholl B. J., Chun M. M., Johnson M. K. (2009). Neural evidence of statistical learning: Efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 21, No. 10, pp. 1934—1945. https:// doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21131
89. Tyler T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 57, pp. 375—400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. psych.57.102904.190038
90. von Haldenwang C. (2016). Measuring legitimacy — New trends, old shortcomings? (Discussion Paper No. 18). Bonn: German Development Institute.
91. Weisbrod B. A. (1991). The health care quadrilemma: An essay on technological change, insurance, quality of care, and cost containment. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 523—552.
92. Wu F., Yan X. (2018). Institutional quality and sustainable development of industries’ exports: Evidence from China. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 11, рр. 1—22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114173
93. Yinusa O. G., Aworinde O. B., Odusanya I. A. (2020). Institutional quality, financial development and inclusive growth: Asymmetric cointegration approach. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 182—205. https://doi.org/10.32327/IJMESS/9.3.2020.10
94. Zhao J., Al-Aidroos N., Turk-Browne N. B. (2013). Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities. Psychological Science, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 667—677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612460407
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Тамбовцев В.Л. Качество институтов: проблемы определения и оценки. Вопросы экономики. 2021;(7):49-67. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-7-49-67
For citation:
Tambovtsev V.L. The quality of institutions: Problems of definition and evaluation. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(7):49-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-7-49-67
Просмотров: 1021
Послать статью по эл. почте 