Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
National and regional type I and II input—output multipliers: Analysis of calculation methods
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-4-32-57
Abstract
The main application of input—output models is the analysis and forecasting of impact that changes in the final consumption volume and composition have on the production structure. The paper presents results of type I and II multipliers calculation for national and regional (evidence from Moscow) economies based on the input—output tables for 2016 for aggregated economic activities. The attention is devoted first of all to structural aspects of multiplicative effects and to the analysis of the variability of regional multipliers calculation results depending on the approaches. To derive regional multipliers we apply location quotient-based approaches. We show that national type II (including induced effects) and regional multipliers estimations may be highly sensitive to the estimation technique choice. Results from such calculations should be interpreted with consideration to differences of the used techniques and their tendencies to under- or overestimate effects of the final consumption structural changes.
About the Authors
A. V. Cherniavsky
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. A. Chepel
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Baranov E. F., Kim I. A., Piontkovski D. I., Staritsyna E. A. (2014). Problems of constructing Russian input—output tables into the international class. HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 7—38. (In Russian).
2. Baranov E. F., Elsakova A. V., Korneva E. S., Staritsyna E. A. (2016). Decomposition analysis of the impact of demand on economic growth (based on input—output tables). Voprosy Statistiki, No. 10, pp. 44—56. (In Russian).
3. Mikheeva N. (2011). Input—output tables: New options of economic analysis. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 7, pp. 140—148. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2011- 7-140-148
4. Strizhkova L. (2006). Investment fund performance and economic growth. Ekonomist, No. 12, pp. 27—48. (In Russian).
5. Strizhkova L. (2016). Using input—output tables in assessing the dependence of the Russian economy on imports and import substitution processes. Voprosy Statistiki, No. 5, pp. 3—22. (In Russian).
6. Shirov A. A., Yantovsky A. A. (2011). Assessment of multiplier effects in the economy. EKO, No. 2, pp. 40—58. (In Russian).]
7. Batey P. (1985). Input—output models for regional demographic-economic analyses: Some structural comparisons. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 73—99. https://doi.org/10.1068/a170073
8. BEA (2013). Regional input—output modeling system II user guide. Washington: Bureau of Economic Analysis.
9. Cassar I. P. et al. (2015). Estimates of output, income value added and employment multipliers for the Maltese economy. Central Bank of Malta Working Paper, No. WP/03/2015.
10. Emonts-Holley T., Ross A., Swales J. K. (2015). Type II errors in IO multipliers. Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) Discussion Papers, No. 2015-56.
11. Eurostat (2008). Eurostat manual of supply, use and input—output tables. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
12. Miller R., Blair P. (2009). Input-output analysis. Foundations and extensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Review
For citations:
Cherniavsky A.V., Chepel A.A. National and regional type I and II input—output multipliers: Analysis of calculation methods. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(4):32-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-4-32-57
Views:
1392
Email this article 
