|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Crisis of institutions of political competition, Internet and collaborative democracy
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-52-72
Abstract
The article examines the crisis of modern Western democracy. It is noted that the important causes of the crisis are slowing down of economic growth and deepening inequality in developed countries. It is shown that inter-party competition inevitably generates a mechanism of degradation of moral norms in the political sphere and reduction of the political system efficiency. These processes have intensified dramatically as a result of the spread of the Internet. They contributed to the reduction of citizens’ participation in political life and at the same time to the ochlocratization of the political system. It is shown as well that a number of transformations taking place in the Western countries are aimed at improvement of interaction mechanisms between the state and society and contribute to overcoming the crisis. These include expanding the role of parliamentary committees, increasing the number of parties, largescale reforms of public sector governance basing on collaboration. In this context, the experience of e-platforms and the possibilities of institutional collaborative platforms are analyzed. The concept of collaborative democracy is proposed, based on the analysis of the trends studied. The mechanism for collaborative democracy should ensure greater choice and broader direct participation of citizens in decision-making, control the costs of political competition and maintain ethical standards, prevent ochlocratization and improve governance. Contours of this mechanism are outlined. It is based on the use of a proportional electoral system of a special type, a system of expert councils and collaborative platforms for public decision-making, as well as on the implementation of decision-making rules close to consensus. The significance of these conclusions for Russia is discussed.
Keywords
ochlocracy,
deliberative democracy,
proportional electoral system,
e-democracy,
collaborative platform
JEL: B55, D60, D72, D73, K16
About the Author
V. M. Polterovich
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences;
Moscow School of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victor M. Polterovich
Moscow
References
1. Gontmakher E. (2019). Universal basic income: The political economic aspect. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 70—79. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2019-3-70-79
2. Linde A. N. (2015). Deliberative democracy as a direction in modern democracy theory: An analysis of the main approaches. Problemnyy Analiz i Gosudarstvenno-Upravlencheskoye Proyektirovaniye, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 52—58. (In Russian).
3. Lysenko V. (2019). On the admission of political parties to participate in parliamentary elections: Foreign experience. Rossiyskiy Fond Svobodnykh Vyborov, June 24. (In Russian). http://www.rfsv.ru/education/informirovanie/o-dopuskepoliticheskikh-partii-k-uchastiiu-v-parlamentskikh-vyborakh-zarubezhnyi-opyt
4. Polterovich V. M. (2015). From social liberalism towards the philosophy of collaboration. Obshchestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost, No. 4, pp. 41—64. (In Russian).
5. Polterovich V. (2016). Positive collaboration: Factors and mechanisms of evolution. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 5—23. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-11-5-23
6. Polterovich V. M. (2018). Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 2. Evolution of coordination mechanisms. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 12, pp. 77—102. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-12-77-102
7. Habermas J. (2001). The inclusion of the other. Studies in political theory. St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russian).
8. Algan Y., Guriev S., Papaioannou E., Passari E. (2017). The European trust crisis and the rise of populism. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 309—400. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2017.0015
9. Alvaredo F., Chancel L., Piketty T., Saez E., Zucman G. (2018). World inequality report 2018. Paris: World Inequality Lab.
10. Ansell C., Gash A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 543—571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
11. Ansell C., Gash A. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 28, No. 1, рр. 16—32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030
12. Armingeon K., Ceka B. (2014). The loss of trust in the European Union during the great recession since 2007: The role of heuristics from the national political system. European Union Politics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 82—107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116513495595
13. Armingeon K., Guthmann K. (2014). Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007—2011. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 423—442. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12046
14. Arnstein S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Рlanners, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 216—224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
15. Bertsou E., Caramani D. (eds.) (2020). The technocratic challenge to democracy. London, New York: Routledge.
16. Besson P., Rowe F. (2012). Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 103—124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2012.05.001
17. Buhlmann M., Zumbach D., Gerber M., Heidelberger A. (2016). Cherry picking at the 2015 Swiss federal elections: The influence of electoral campaigning on panachage and cumulation. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Prague, September 7—10. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/4d62000c-e082-4f6bb202-84de6e5c3aef.pdf
18. Borgesius F. Z., Moller J., Kruikemeier S., Fathaigh R. Ó., Irion K., Dobber T., de Vreese C. (2018). Online political microtargeting: Promises and threats for democracy. Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 82—96. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.420
19. Commission of the European Communities (2002). Improving the knowledge base for better policies. Communication from the Commission on the collection and use of expertise by the Commission: Principles and guidelines. COM (2002) 713 final. Brussels.
20. Crozier M., Huntington S. P., Watanuki J. (1975). The crisis of democracy. New York: New York University Press.
21. De Wijze S. (2018). The problem of democratic dirty hands: Citizen complicity, responsibility, and guilt. The Monist, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp. 129—149. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onx039
22. Doberstein С. (2016). Designing collaborative governance decision making in search of a ‘collaborative advantage’. Public Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 6, рр. 819—841. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1045019
23. Eurobarometer (2018). Parlemeter 2018: Taking up the challenge from (silent) support to actual vote. Brussels: EU Publications. https://doi.org/10.2861/886943
24. Flaxman S., Goel S., Rao J. M. (2013). Ideological segregation and the effects of social media on news consumption. Unpublished manuscript. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/768e/b9576a9a478c95e8ed3434ea4752c4098aa7.pdf?_ga=2.148732855.1232569661.1609887108-1229386046.1605027020
25. Floridia A. (2013). Participatory democracy versus deliberative democracy: Еlements for a possible theoretical genealogy. Two histories, some intersections. Paper presented at the 7th ECPR General Conference, Sciences Po, Bordeaux, September 4—7. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/71d7f83c-3fe4-4b11-82a2-c151cd3769f4.pdf
26. Foa R. S., Mounk Y. (2017). The signs of deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 5—16. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0000
27. Foster C., Frieden J. (2017). Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government. European Union Politics, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 511—535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517723499
28. Gehl K. M., Porter M. E. (2017). Why competition in the politics industry is failing America: A strategy for reinvigorating our democracy. Boston: Harvard Business School.
29. Gálvez J. P. (2017). Democracy in times of ochlocracy. Synthesis Philosophica, Vol. 63, No. 1, рр. 167—178. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp32112
30. Hall R. P., Ashford R., Ashford N. A., Arango-Quiroga J. (2019). Universal basic income and inclusive capitalism: Consequences for sustainability. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 16, article 4481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164481
31. Hoch J. E., Dulebohn J. H. (2017). Team personality composition, emergent leadership and shared leadership in virtual teams: A theoretical framework. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 678—693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.012
32. Holst C., Molander A. (2017). Public deliberation and the fact of expertise: Making experts accountable. Social Epistemology, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 235—250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1317865
33. Holst C., Molander A. (2019). Epistemic democracy and the role of experts. Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 541—561. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-00299-4
34. Jay S., Batruch A., Jetten J., McGarty C., Muldoon O. T. (2019). Economic inequality and the rise of far-right populism: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 418—428. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2409
35. Jungherr A., Schroeder R., Stier S. (2019). Digital media and the surge of political outsiders: Explaining the success of political challengers in the United States, Germany, and China. Social Media + Society, April. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119875439
36. Kekez A., Howlett M., Ramesh M. (2018). Varieties of collaboration in public service delivery. Policy Design and Practice, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 243—252. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1532026
37. Le Blanc D. (2020). E-participation: A quick overview of recent qualitative trends. DESA Working Paper, No. 163. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
38. Morse A., Gass J. J. (2006). More choices, more voices: A primer on fusion. Brennan Center for Justice. https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2019-08/Report_More-Choices-More-Voices.pdf
39. Nielsen R., Hennen L., Korthagen I., Aichholzer G., Lindner R. (2020). Options for improving e-participation at the EU level. In: L. Hennen, I. V. Keulen, I. Korthagen, G. Aichholzer, R. Lindner, R. Nielsen (еds.). European E-democracy in practice, studies in digital politics and governance. SpringerOpen, pp. 329—359.
40. Scarrow H. A. (1986). Duverger’s law, fusion, and the decline of american “third” parties. The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 4, рр. 634—647. https://doi.org/10.2307/448267
41. Solijonov A. (2016). Voter turn-out trends around the world. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
42. Tillyris D. (2019). Political realism and dirty hands: Value pluralism, moral conflict and public ethics. Philosophia, Vol. 47, pp. 1579—1602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00071-x
43. Qvortrup M. (2017). The rise of referendums: Demystifying direct democracy. Journal of Democracy, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 141—152. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0052
44. Qvortrup M. (2018). Western Europe. In: M. Qvortrup (ed.). Referendums around the world. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 19—45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57798-2_2
45. Uslaner E. (2011). Corruption, the inequality trap and trust in government. In: S. Zmerli, M. Hooghe (еds.). Political trust. Why context matters . Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 141—162.
46. Van der Meer T. W. G. (2017). Political trust and “the crisis of democracy”. In: R. J. Dalton (ed.). Oxford research encyclopedia on politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Van Elsas E. J., Brosius A., Marquart F., De Vreese C. H. (2020). How political malpractice affects trust in EU institutions. West European Politics, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 944—968. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1667654
48. Walzer M. (1973). Political action: The problem of dirty hands. Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 160—180.
49. Weeks L. (2015). Parliaments without parties. Australasian Parliamentary Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 61—71.
50. World Bank (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. Washington, DC.
Review
For citations:
Polterovich V.M. Crisis of institutions of political competition, Internet and collaborative democracy. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(1):52-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-52-72
Views:
1580
Email this article 
