|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
“Physicists” and “lyricists”: Whom the Russian labor market values higher?
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-8-5-36
Abstract
In this study, we raise a simple question: do STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) education and employment provide a monetary return to professionals with this specialization and holding STEM jobs? If yes, what is the premium across ages and cohorts? We compare wages of professionals with the STEM education and without it, holding STEM jobs and those working in alternative positions, and with various combinations of education and jobs. We estimate premiums for the whole sample as well as for different age groups and cohorts. For this, we use various large data sets with variables for college majors and occupational positions. The main conclusion is that the STEM specialization brings no significant benefits compared to non-STEM majors and jobs. The premium does not emerge over experience or age; moreover, older groups engaged in STEM-related work tend to experience a wage penalty. As we move from younger to older age cohorts, the wage growth declines which means that wages for younger age cohorts catch up and take over the older ones, even if they were initially lower. These results are reproduced on all available datasets.
About the Authors
V. E. Gimpelson
https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/312277
HSE University; Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
HSE University; Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Vladimir E. Gimpelson
Moscow
D. I. Zinchenko
References
1. Varshavskaya E. Y., Kotyrlo E. S. (2019). Engineering and economics graduates: Between demand and supply. Educational Studies Moscow, No. 2, pp. 98—128. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2019-2-98-128
2. Gimpelson V. E. (2010). Does the Russian industry need skilled labour? Evidence from recent history. Journal of Economic Sociology, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 24—68. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2010-4-24-68
3. Gimpelson V. E. (2019). Age and wage: Stylized facts and Russian evidence. HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 185—237. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2019-23-2-185-237
4. Gimpelson V. E., Zinchenko D. I. (2019). “Cost of getting older”: Wages of older age workers. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 35—62. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-11-35-62
5. Denisova I. A., Kartseva M. A. (2008). Returns to educational attainment, level and quality. In: V. Gimpelson, R. Kapeliushnikov (eds.). Wages in Russia: Evolution and differentiation. Moscow: HSE Publ., pp. 343—402. (In Russian).
6. Cattell R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Deming D. J., Noray K. L. (2018). STEM careers and the changing skill requirements of work. NBER Working Paper, No. 25065. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25065
8. Gimpelson V., Kapeliushnikov R., Lukiyanova A. (2012). Stuck between surplus and shortage: Demand for skills in Russian industry. In: In the grip of transition: Economic and social consequences of restructuring in Russia and Ukraine. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 47—75.
9. Krueger D., Kumar K. B. (2004). Skill-specific rather than general education: A reason for US—Europe growth differences? Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 167—207. https://doi.org/10.1023/BJOEG.0000031426.09886.
10. Lagakos D., Moll B., Porzio T., Qian N., Schoellman T. (2018). Life cycle wage growth across countries. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 126, No. 2, pp. 797—849. https://doi.org/10.1086/696225
11. Neuman S., Weiss A. (1995). On the effects of schooling vintage on experience-earnings profiles: Theory and evidence. European Economic Review, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 943—955. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)00019-V
12. Panorama E. S. (2014). Employability and skills of higher education graduates. Analytical highlight, prepared by ICF GHK and Cedefop for the European Commission.
13. Rosen S. (1975). Measuring the obsolescence of knowledge. In: F. T. Juster (ed.). Education, income, and human behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 199—232.
14. Xue Y., Larson R. C. (2015). STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes. Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 138, No. 5, pp. 1—13. https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2015.14
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Gimpelson V.E., Zinchenko D.I. “Physicists” and “lyricists”: Whom the Russian labor market values higher? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(8):5-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-8-5-36
Views:
2312
Email this article 
