Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Marginalism and Marxism: The first encounter
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-2-102-132
Abstract
The paper discusses a critical episode in the history of economic thought of the 19th century — the first encounter between marginalism and Marxism. It happened in 1884, when Philip Wickstead published a short twenty-page text in the magazine of “scientific” socialism “To-Day” under the laconic title “Das Kapital: a Сriticism”. The paper briefly traces the creative path of Wickstead; considers the reasons that prompted him to make a stand against Marxism; analyzes his main criticisms; describes the reaction to them by his contemporaries (both professional economists and adherents of socialism) and evaluates the place of his work in the history of ideas. It is noted that Wicksteed’s article was not only the first encounter of marginalism with Marxism, but also the first popular exposituion of the theory of marginal utility (in the version of S. Jevons), which was completely new for that time. His criticism was radical in nature, since it was aimed not at revealing partial shortcomings, but at the complete collapse of the Marxist construction and its replacement with an alternative theoretical scheme. Amazingly, none of Marx’s supporters dared to accept Wickstead’s challenge and his criticism was never publicly contested by them. This seemingly inconspicuous event turned out to be of crucial historical significance. Under the influence of Wickstead, the Fabians rejected the labor theory of value and British socialism (in its main part) ceased to be Marxist forever.
About the Author
R. I. Kapeliushnikov
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, RAS;
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Rostislav I. Kapeliushnikov
Moscow
References
1. Bernstein E. (2015). The preconditions of socialism. Moscow: Librokom. (In Russian).
2. Böm-Bawerk E. (2009). The exploitation theory. In: E. Böm-Bawerk. Selected works on value, capital and interest, Vol. 1. Moscow: Eksmo, pp. 601—704. (In Russian).
3. Marx K. (1960). Capital. Vol. 1. In: K. Marx, F. Engels. Works. 2nd ed., Vol. 23. Moscow: Gospolitizdat. (In Russian).
4. Marx K. (1962). Capital. Vol. 3. In: K. Marx, F. Engels. Works. 2nd ed., Vol. 25, part 2. Moscow: Gospolitizdat. (In Russian).
5. Skidelsky R. (2005). John Maynard Keynes, 1883—1946. Vol. 2. Moscow: Moskovskaya Shkola Politicheskih Issledovaniy. (In Russian).
6. Hayek F. (1992). The fatal conceit. Moscow: Novosti. (In Russian).
7. Hayek F. (2005). The road to serfdom. Moscow: Novoe Izdatelstvo. (In Russian).
8. Engels F. (1955). Principles of communism. In: K. Marx, F. Engels. Works. 2nd ed., Vol. 4. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, pp. 322—339. (In Russian).
9. Engels F. (1964). Friedrich to Eduard Bernstein, 13—15 September 1884. In: K. Marx, F. Engels. Works. 2nd ed., Vol. 36. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, pp. 177—179. (In Russian).
10. Barker C. A. (1955). Henry George. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. De Vivo G. (1987). Marx, Jevons, and early Fabian socialism. Political Economy. Studies in the Surplus Approach, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 37—61.
12. Dorfman J. (1949). The economic mind in American civilization, Volume Three 1865— 1918. New York: Viking.
13. Edgeworth F. Y. (1921). Review: “The revival of Marxism” by J. S. Nicholson; “Karl Marx” by A. Loria. Economic Journal, Vol. 31, No. 121, pp. 71—73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2223292
14. Ellis R. W. (ed.) (1930). Bernard Shaw and Karl Marx. A symposium, 1884—1889. New York: Random House.
15. Flatau P. (2004). Jevons’s one great disciple: Wicksteed and the Jevonian revolution in the second generation. History of Economics Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 69—107. https://doi.org/10.1080/18386318.2004.11681191
16. George H. (1879). Progress and poverty. An inquiry into the cause of industrial depressions, and of increase of want with increase of wealth — the remedy. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench.
17. Hobsbawm E. J. (1957). Dr. Marx and the Victorian critics. New Reasoner, No. 1, pp. 29—38.
18. Howey R. S. (1960). The rise of the marginal utility school, 1870—1889. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
19. Hutchison T. W. (1953). A review of economic doctrines, 1870—1929. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Kirzner I. M. (1999). Philip Wicksteed: The British Austrian. In: R. G. Holcombe (ed.). 15 great Austrian economists. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp. 101—112.
21. Mornati F. (2018). Vilfredo Pareto: An intellectual biography, Vol. 1. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Pareto V. (1902). Les systèmes socialistes, Vol. 1—2. Paris: Giard & E. Brière.
23. Robbins L. (1970). Philip Wicksteed as an economist. In: L. Robbins. The evolution of modern economic theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 189—209.
24. Robinson J. V. (1934). Euler’s theorem and the problem of distribution. Economic Journal, Vol. 44, No. 175, pp. 398—414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2225401
25. Schumpeter J. A. (1954). History of economic analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Shaw G. B. (1885). The Jevonian critique of Marx. To-Day, Vol. III, January, pp. 22—26.
27. Shaw B. (ed.) (1889). Fabian essays in socialism. New York: Humboldt.
28. Shaw B. (1926). On the history of Fabian economics. In: E. R. Pease. The history of the Fabian Society, Appendix IV. New York: International Publishers.
29. Shaw G. B. (1949). Sixteen self sketches by Bernard Shaw. London: Constable and Company.
30. Sidgwick H. (1895). The economic lessons of socialism. Economic Journal, Vol. 5, No. 19, pp. 336—346. https://doi.org/10.2307/2955619
31. Steedman I. (1989). P. H. Wicksteed’s Jevonian critique of Marx. In: I. Steedman. From exploitation to altruism. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 117—144.
32. Stigler G. J. (1941). Production and distribution theories: The formative period. New York: Macmillan.
33. Stigler G. J. (1959). Bernard Shaw, Sidney Webb and the theory of Fabian socialism. Proceedings of American Philosophical Society, Vol. 103, No. 3, pp. 469—475.
34. Sweezy P. M. (1949). Fabian political economy. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 242—248. https://doi.org/10.1086/256809
35. White M. V. (2018). Searching for New Jerusalems: P. H. Wicksteed’s “Jevonian” critique of Marx’s “Capital”. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 1113—1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2018.1523938
36. Wicksteed P. H. (1882). Progress and poverty. Inquirer, December 30, pp. 839—840.
37. Wicksteed P. H. (1883). Progress and poverty. Letter to the editor. Inquirer, June 23, pp. 389—390.
38. Wicksteed P. H. (1884). “Das Kapital”: a Сriticism. To-Day, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 388—409.
39. Wicksteed P. H. (1885). The Jevonian criticism of Marx: A rejoinder. To-Day, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 177—179.
40. Wicksteed P. H. (1888). The alphabet of economic science. Part 1. Elements of the theory of value or worth. London: Macmillan.
41. Wicksteed P. H. (1890). Fabian essays in socialism. Inquirer, August 16, pp. 530—531.
42. Wicksteed P. H. (1894). The co-ordination of the laws of distribution. London: Macmillan.
43. Wicksteed P. H. (1905). Jevons’s economic work. Economic Journal, Vol. 15, No. 59, pp. 432—436. https://doi.org/10.2307/2221414
44. Wicksteed P. H. (1914). The scope and method of political economy in the light of the “marginal” theory of value and of distribution. Economic Journal, Vol. 24, No. 93, pp. 1—23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2221810
45. Wicksteed P. H. (1933). The common sense of political economy. In: P. H. Wicksteed. The common sense of political economy and selected papers and reviews on economic theory, Vol. 2. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 401—702.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kapeliushnikov R.I. Marginalism and Marxism: The first encounter. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(2):102-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-2-102-132
Views:
2596
Email this article 
