Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Replacement rate as an instrument of analysis and forecasting of pension system

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-12-80-103

Abstract

The article examines one of the main indicators of pension adequacy the replacement rate. The importance of using this indicator for pension system management is substantiated. A methodology for determining theoretical and empirical replacement rates is proposed in relation to the peculiarities of the Russian system of compulsory pension insurance. The article presents the results of calculations carried out on the model of the theoretical replacement rate developed by the authors, according to which, in the current Russian conditions, the replacement coefficient for an employee with a median wage and average length of service is more than 40%, which corresponds to the international criteria for the sufficiency of pensions for this indicator. However, with higher wages, for example, equal to the average for Russia and above, there is a lag behind the level of most EU countries. Modeling shows that in 2002—2018, there was an increase in the differentiation of pensions and replacement rates depending on wages. The performed forecast calculations for the period up to 2050 have revealed the following trends: a decrease in replacement rates for recipients of minimum and median salaries, approximate stabilization for average salaries and growth for recipients with high salaries. The article provides a number of examples of using the theoretical replacement rate for the analysis of the pension system in terms of the effect on the level of pensions: participation in the formation of pension savings, valorization, years of the insurance period, etc.

About the Authors

Y. M. Gorlin
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Yury M. Gorlin

Moscow



V. Y. Lyashok
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Victor Y. Lyashok

Moscow



A. A. Salmina
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Alla A. Salmina

Moscow



References

1. Gorlin Y. M., Salmina A. A. (2019). Comparative analysis of international experience in applying pension adequacy indicators. Vestnik Instituta Еkonomiki RAS, No. 5, pp. 114—131. (In Russian).

2. Borella M., Fornero E. (2009). Adequacy of pension systems in Europe: An analysis based on comprehensive replacement rates. ENEPRI Research Report, No. 68. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2033652

3. Draxler J., Mortensen J. (2009). Towards sustainable but still adequate pensions in the EU. Theory, trends and simulations. ENEPRI Research Report, No. 67. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2033677

4. EC (2005). Working together, working better: A new framework for the open coordination of social protection and inclusion policies in the European Union. COM(2005) 706 Final. Brussels: European Commission.

5. EC (2012). The 2012 ageing report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU member states (2010—2060). Brussels: European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2765/19991

6. EC (2018). The 2018 pension adequacy report: Current and future income adequacy in old age in the EU, Vol. 1. Brussels: European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2767/406275

7. Finch D., Gardiner L. (2017). As good as it gets? The adequacy of retirement income for current and future generations of pensioners. Intergenerational Commission Report, Resolution Foundation.

8. Grech A. G. (2013). How best to measure pension adequacy. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.

9. Holzmann R., Hinz R. (2005). Old-age income support in the 21st century: An international perspective on pension systems and reform. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-6040-X

10. ILO (1952). C102 — Social security (minimum standards) convention, 1952 (No. 102). International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C102

11. ILO (1967). C128 — Invalidity, old-age and survivors’ benefits convention, 1967 (No. 128). International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO:12100:P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312273:NO

12. OECD (2017). Pensions at a glance 2017: OECD and G20 indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19991363

13. OECD (2019a). Pensions at a glance 2019: OECD and G20 indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19991363

14. OECD (2019b). Working better with age. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c4d4f66a-en

15. Whitehouse E. (2007). Pensions panorama: Retirement-income systems in 53 countries. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264032118-en


Review

For citations:


Gorlin Y.M., Lyashok V.Y., Salmina A.A. Replacement rate as an instrument of analysis and forecasting of pension system. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2020;(12):80-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-12-80-103

Views: 1297


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)