

Replacement rate as an instrument of analysis and forecasting of pension system
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-12-80-103
Abstract
About the Authors
Y. M. GorlinRussian Federation
Yury M. Gorlin
Moscow
V. Y. Lyashok
Russian Federation
Victor Y. Lyashok
Moscow
A. A. Salmina
Russian Federation
Alla A. Salmina
Moscow
References
1. Gorlin Y. M., Salmina A. A. (2019). Comparative analysis of international experience in applying pension adequacy indicators. Vestnik Instituta Еkonomiki RAS, No. 5, pp. 114—131. (In Russian).
2. Borella M., Fornero E. (2009). Adequacy of pension systems in Europe: An analysis based on comprehensive replacement rates. ENEPRI Research Report, No. 68. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2033652
3. Draxler J., Mortensen J. (2009). Towards sustainable but still adequate pensions in the EU. Theory, trends and simulations. ENEPRI Research Report, No. 67. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2033677
4. EC (2005). Working together, working better: A new framework for the open coordination of social protection and inclusion policies in the European Union. COM(2005) 706 Final. Brussels: European Commission.
5. EC (2012). The 2012 ageing report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU member states (2010—2060). Brussels: European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2765/19991
6. EC (2018). The 2018 pension adequacy report: Current and future income adequacy in old age in the EU, Vol. 1. Brussels: European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2767/406275
7. Finch D., Gardiner L. (2017). As good as it gets? The adequacy of retirement income for current and future generations of pensioners. Intergenerational Commission Report, Resolution Foundation.
8. Grech A. G. (2013). How best to measure pension adequacy. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.
9. Holzmann R., Hinz R. (2005). Old-age income support in the 21st century: An international perspective on pension systems and reform. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-6040-X
10. ILO (1952). C102 — Social security (minimum standards) convention, 1952 (No. 102). International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C102
11. ILO (1967). C128 — Invalidity, old-age and survivors’ benefits convention, 1967 (No. 128). International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO:12100:P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312273:NO
12. OECD (2017). Pensions at a glance 2017: OECD and G20 indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19991363
13. OECD (2019a). Pensions at a glance 2019: OECD and G20 indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19991363
14. OECD (2019b). Working better with age. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c4d4f66a-en
15. Whitehouse E. (2007). Pensions panorama: Retirement-income systems in 53 countries. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264032118-en
Review
For citations:
Gorlin Y.M., Lyashok V.Y., Salmina A.A. Replacement rate as an instrument of analysis and forecasting of pension system. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2020;(12):80-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-12-80-103