Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The impact of banks’ capital adequacy ratio on bank lending channel of monetary transmission in Russia

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-7-62-78

Abstract

The new Basel III rules of macroprudential regulation were introduced for the Russian banking sector in 2014. This article analyzes a previously unexamined for Russia impact of capital adequacy ratio on the effectiveness of bank lending channel. It is shown that when banks satisfy capital regulation rules this has a direct influence on this channel of monetary transmission mechanism: a high capital adequacy ratio weakens a contractionary effect of an increase in the Bank of Russia key rate and further stimulates credit growth when the Bank of Russia decreases its key rate. The peculiar properties of the Bank of Russia key rate dynamics in the previous years allowed to reveal the asymmetry of monetary transmission. Such an analysis also reflects the value-added of the present study.

About the Author

O. Borzykh
National Research University Higher School of Economics; Bank of Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Borzykh O. A. (2016a). Liquidity “anti-effect” in the Russian banking system. HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 377—414. (In Russian).

2. Borzykh O. A. (2016b). Bank lending channel in Russia: A TVP-FAVAR approach. Applied Econometrics, Vol. 43, pp. 96—117. (In Russian).

3. Golovan S. V., Nazin V. V., Peresetsky A. A. (2010). Nonparametric analysis of the efficiency of Russian banks. Economics and Mathematical Methods, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 43—57. (In Russian).

4. Drobyshevsky S.  M., Trunin P.  V., Kamenskih M.  V. (2008). Analysis of transmission mechanisms of money and credit policy in Russia’s economy (Working Papers No. 116P). Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).

5. Lomivorotov R. V. (2015). Bayesian estimation of monetary policy in Russia. Applied Econometrics, Vol. 38, pp. 41—63. (In Russian).

6. Moiseev S. R. (2008). New “holy cow”: inflation targeting. Financial analytics: Science and Experience, Vol. 7, No. 7, pp. 36—43. (In Russian).

7. Perevyshina E. A., Perevyshin Y. N. (2015). Evaluation of credit channel in Russia. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 4, pp. 96—110. (In Russian).

8. Aiyar S., Calomiris C. W., Wieladek T. (2014). How does credit supply respond to monetary policy and bank minimum capital requirements? Bank of England Working Paper Series, No. 508.

9. Ashcraft A. B. (2006). New evidence on the lending channel. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 751-775.

10. Bernanke B. S., Boivin J., Eliasz P. (2005). Measuring the effects of monetary policy: a factor-augmented vector autoregressive (FAVAR) approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 120, No. 1, pp. 387-422.

11. Borio C., Zhu H. (2012). Capital regulation, risk-taking and monetary policy: a missing link in the transmission mechanism? Journal of Financial Stability, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 236-251.

12. Caldara D., Kamps C. (2008). What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks? A VAR-based comparative analysis. ECB Working Paper Series, No. 877.

13. De Marco F., Wieladek T. (2015). The real effects of capital requirements and monetary policy: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Bank of England Working Paper Series, No. 573.

14. Driscoll J. C., Kraay A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 80, No. 4, pp. 549-560.

15. Egorov A., Kovalenko O. (2013). Structural features and interest-rate dynamics of Russia’s interbank lending market. BOFIT Discussion Papers, No. 23.

16. Farinha L., Marques C. R. (2001). The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data. ECB Working Paper Series, No. 102.

17. Gale D. (2010). Capital regulation and risk sharing. International Journal of Central Banking, December, pp. 187-204.

18. Gambacorta L., Shin H. S. (2016). Why bank capital matters for monetary policy. Journal of Financial Intermediation, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2016.09.005

19. Gavalas D. (2015). How do banks perform under Basel III? Tracing lending rates and loan quantity. Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 81, pp. 21-37.

20. Ghosh S. (2008). Capital requirements, bank behavior and monetary policy - a theoretical analysis with an empirical application to India. Indian Economic Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 205-227.

21. Juurikkala T., Karas A., Solanko L. (2009). The role of banks in monetary policy: Empirical evidence from Russia. BOFIT Discussion Papers, No. 8.

22. Kashyap A. K., Stein J. C. (2000). What do a million observations say about the transmission of monetary policy? American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 407-428.

23. Kishan R. P., Opiela T. P. (2000). Bank size, bank capital, and the bank lending channel. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 121-141.

24. Mishkin F. S. (1996). The channel of monetary transmission: Lessons for monetary policy. NBER Working Papers, No. 5464.

25. Moraes C. D., Montes G. C., Antunes J. A. P. (2016). How does capital regulation react to monetary policy? New evidence on the risk-taking channel. Economic Modelling, Vol. 56, No. C, pp. 177-186.

26. Nachane D. M., Ghosh S., Ray P. (2006). Basel II and bank lending behaviour: some likely implications for monetary policy. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 1053-1058.

27. Ono S. (2015). Bank lending channel in monetary policy transmission: evidence from Russia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 1-11.

28. Souza L. V. (2006). Estimating the existence of the bank lending channel in the Russian Federation. Bank i Kredyt, No. 9, pp. 3-13.


Review

For citations:


Borzykh O. The impact of banks’ capital adequacy ratio on bank lending channel of monetary transmission in Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2017;(7):62-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-7-62-78

Views: 891


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)