Открытый доступ
Только для подписчиков
Нуждается ли промышленная политика в теоретических оправданиях?
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-5-29-44
Аннотация
На основе анализа дискуссий по поводу определений и обоснований промышленной политики в статье предлагается ее новая трактовка как совокупности намерений правительства сделать национальную экономику хорошей и средств осуществления этих намерений. Анализируются возможные значения понятия «хорошая экономика», особенности когнитивных процессов, которые могут определять, какую экономику считать таковой. Обобщены результаты позитивных исследований, выявивших некоторые структурные параметры экономики, наличие которых повышает ее устойчивость и конкурентоспособность. Показано, что достижение этих параметров не всегда соответствует политическим целям правительств.
Ключевые слова
промышленная политика,
правительство,
хорошая экономика,
когнитивные процессы,
диверсификация,
предпринимательство,
инновации
JEL: D72; F63; H11; L50
Об авторе
В. Л. Тамбовцев
МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова
Россия
д. э. н., проф., главный научный сотрудник экономического факультета МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова (Москва)
Россия
д. э. н., проф., главный научный сотрудник экономического факультета МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова (Москва)
Список литературы
1. Дементьев Е. В. (2014). Об ориентирах промышленной политики // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 2. С. 201-205
2. Клейнер Г. (2013). Какая экономика нужна России и для чего? (опыт системного исследования) // Вопросы экономики. № 10. С. 4-27
3. Кудрин А., Гурвич Е. (2014). Новая модель роста для российской экономики // Вопросы экономики. № 12. С. 4-36
4. Кузнецов Б. В., Симачев Ю. В. (2014). Эволюция государственной промышленной политики в России // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 2. С. 152-178
5. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. (2013). Economics versus politics: Pitfalls of policy advice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 27, Nо. 2, рр. 173-192.
6. Adams F. G., Klein L. R. (eds.) (1983). Industrial policies for growth and competitiveness. Lexington: Lexington Books.
7. Aiginger K. (2007). Industrial policy: A dying breed or a re-emerging phoenix? Journal of Industry Competition and Trade, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 297-323.
8. Albiol-Sanchez J., van Stel A. (2016). Investigating the impact of small versus large firms on economic performance of countries and industries. In: D. Bögenhold, J. Bonnet, M. Dejardin, D. G. Pérez de Lema (eds.). Contemporary entrepreneurship: Multidis-ciplinary perspectives on innovation and growth. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 51-73.
9. Atkinson M. M. (2013). Policy, politics and political science. Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 46, Is. 4, pp. 751-772.
10. Audretsch D. B., Carree M. A., van Stel A. J., Thurik A. R. (2002). Impeded industrial restructuring: The growth penalty. Kyklos, Vol. 55, No. 1, рр. 81-98.
11. Audretsch D. B., Thurik R. (2001). Linking entrepreneurship to growth (STI Working Paper No. 2001/02). Paris: OECD Publishing.
12. Baker T., Moss D. (2009). Government as risk manager. In: D. Moss, J. Cisternino (eds.). New perspectives on regulation. Cambridge, MA: The Tobin Project, pp. 87-109.
13. Baron J. (2010). Cognitive biases in moral judgments that affect political behavior. Synthese, Vol. 172, No. 1, pp. 7-35.
14. Beath J. (2002). UK industrial policy: Old tunes on new instruments? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 221-239.
15. Bjorvatn K., Coniglio N. D. (2012). Big push or big failure? On the effectiveness of industrialization policies for economic development. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol. 26, No. 1, рр. 129-141.
16. Cadot O., Carrиre C., Strauss-Kahn V. (2011). Export diversification: What’s behind the hump? Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 93, No. 2, рр. 590-605.
17. Carree M. A. (2002). Industrial restructuring and economic growth. Small Business Economics, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 243-255.
18. Casula-Vifell Å., Sjögren E. (2011). More knowledge, better government? Consequences of knowledge-based decision making in Swedish pharmaceutical benefits. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 85-110.
19. Chang H.-J. (2011). Industrial policy: Can we go beyond an unproductive confrontation? In: J. Y. Lin, B. Pleskovic (eds.). Lessons from East Asia and the global financial crisis. Washington, DC: World Bank, рр. 83-109.
20. Clift B., Woll C. (2012). Economic patriotism: Reinventing control over open markets. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 19, No. 3, рр. 307-323.
21. Coates D. (1996). Industrial policy in Britain. London: Macmillan.
22. Cohen W. M. (2010). Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In: B. H. Hall, N. Rosenberg (eds.). Handbook of the economics of innovation, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, рр. 129-213.
23. Crafts N. F. R., Hughe A. (2014). Industrial policy for the medium to long-term. CAGE Online Working Paper Series, No. 179.
24. Curzon Price V. (1981). Industrial policies in the European Community. London: Macmillan.
25. Dreher A., Lamla M. J., Lein S. M., Somogyi F. (2009). The impact of political leaders’ profession and education on reforms. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 37, No. 1, рр. 169-193.
26. El-Agraa A. M. (1997). UK competitiveness policy vs. Japanese industrial policy. Economic Journal, Vol. 107, No. 444, pp. 1504-1517.
27. Erikson J. (2015). Ideas and actors in policy processes: Where is the interaction? Policy Studies, Vol. 36, No. 5, рр. 451-467.
28. Felipe J., Kumar U., Abdon A., Bacate M. (2012). Product complexity and economic development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 23, No. 1, рр. 36-68.
29. Fourie F. C. v. N. (1993). In the beginning there were markets? In: C. Pitelis (ed.). Transaction costs, markets and hierarchies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 41-65.
30. Federico G., Foreman-Peck J. (1999). European industrial policy: Introduction. In: J. Foreman-Peck, G. Federico (eds.). European industrial policy: The twentiethcentury experience. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-17.
31. Geroski P. A. (1989). European industrial policy and industrial policy in Europe. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 20-36.
32. Grant D. P. (2014). What makes a good economy? Evidence from public opinion surveys. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 52, No. 3, рр. 1120-1136.
33. Greenwald B. C., Stiglitz J. E. (1986). Externalities in economies with imperfect information and incomplete markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp. 229-264.
34. Grossman G., Helpman E. (1994). Protection for sale. American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 833-850.
35. Harrison A., Rodríguez-Clare A. (2010). Trade, foreign investment, and industrial policy for developing countries. In: D. Rodrik, M. Rosenzweig (eds.). Handbook of development economics, Vol. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 4039-4214.
36. Hidalgo C. A., Hausmann R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 106, No. 26, рр. 10570-10575.
37. Howlett M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, Vol. 52, No. 2, рр. 153-175.
38. Howlett M. (2012). The lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policymaking. International Political Science Review, Vol. 33, No. 5, рр. 539-555.
39. Imbs J., Wacziarg R. (2003). Stages of diversification. American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 1, рр. 63-86.
40. Jacquemin A. (1983). Industrial policies and the Community. In: P. Coffey (ed.). Main economic policy areas of the EEC. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 27-57.
41. Jann W., Wegrich K. (2007). Theories of the policy cycle. In: F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, M. S. Sidney (eds.). Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods. Boca Raton, London, New York: Taylor and Francis, pp. 43-62.
42. Kemp M. C. (1964). The pure theory of international trade. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
43. Krueger A. O. (1990). Government failures in development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 9-23.
44. Krugman P., Obstfeld M. (1991). International economics: Theory and policy. 5th ed. New York: HarperCollins.
45. Lewis A. (1955). The theory of economic growth. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
46. Melitz M. J. (2005). When and how should infant industries be protected? Journal of International Economics, Vol. 66, No. 1, рр. 177-196.
47. Naudé W. (2010). Industrial policy: Old and new issues. WIDER Working Paper, No. 2010/106.
48. Pack H., Saggi K. (2006). Is there a case for industrial policy? A critical survey. World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 267-297.
49. Pitelis C. N. (2006). Industrial policy: Perspectives, experience, issues. In: P. Bianchi, S. Labory (eds.). International handbook on industrial policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 435-449.
50. Pryke S. (2012). Economic nationalism: Theory, history and prospects. Global Policy, Vol. 3, No. 3, рр. 281-291.
51. Rodríguez-Clare A. (2007). Clusters and comparative advantage: Implications for industrial policy. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 82, No. 1, рр. 43-57.
52. Rodríguez-Clare A., Rodríguez F., Fischer R. (2005). Coordination failures, clusters, and microeconomic interventions [with Comments]. Economía, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-42.
53. Rodrik D. (1996). Coordination failures and government policy: A model with applications to East Asia and Eastern Europe. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 40, No. 1-2, pp. 1-22.
54. Rodrik D. (2000). Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them. Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 3-31.
55. Rodrik D. (2008). Normalizing industrial policy. World Bank Working Paper, Nо. 3.
56. Rodrik D. (2009). Industrial policy: Don’t ask why, ask how. Middle East Development Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-29.
57. Rostow W. W. (1959). The stages of economic growth. Economic History Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, рр. 1-16.
58. Singh A. (2002). Competition and competition policy in emerging markets: International and development dimensions. G-24 Discussion Papers, No. 18.
59. Stanovich K. E., West R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 645-665.
60. Starosta de Waldemar F. (2010). How costly is rent-seeking to diversification: An empirical approach (CES WP No. 2010.08). Paris: Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne.
61. Stiglitz J. E. (2016). The state, the market, and development. WIDER Working Paper, No. 2016/1.
62. Szalavetz A. (2015). Post-crisis approaches to state intervention: New developmentalism or industrial policy as usual? Competition and Change, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 70-83.
63. Tacchella A., Cristelli M., Caldarelli G., Gabrielli A., Pietronero L. (2013). Economic complexity: Conceptual grounding of a new metrics for global competitiveness. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 37, No. 8, рр. 1683-1691.
64. van Praag C. M., Versloot P. H. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 351-382.
65. Wachter M. L., Wachter S. M. (1981). Introduction. In: M. L. Wachter, S. M. Wachter (eds.). Toward a new industrial policy? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1-5.
66. Wade R. H. (2002). Bringing the state back in: Lessons from East Asia’s development experience. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, Vol. 8, No. 2, рр. 98-115.
67. Warwick K. (2013). Beyond industrial policy: Emerging issues and new trends. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 2.
68. Weiss C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, Vol. 39, No. 5, рр. 426-431.
69. White L. J. (2008). Antitrust policy and industrial policy: A view from the US. New York University Law and Economics Working Papers, No. 118.
70. Whitehead M., Jones R., Pykett J. (2011). Governing irrationality, or a more than rational government? Reflections on the rescientisation of decision making in British public policy. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 43, No. 12, pр. 2819-2837.
71. Wiig A., Kolstad I. (2012). If diversification is good, why don’t countries diversify more? The political economy of diversification in resource-rich countries. Energy Policy, Vol. 40, No. 1, рр. 196-203.
72. Williamson O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. A study in the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press.
73. Wong P. K., Ho Y. P., Autio E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, Vol. 24, No. 3, рр. 335-350.
74. Wren C. (2001). The industrial policy of competitiveness: A review of recent developments in the UK. Regional Studies, Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 847-860.
75. Yulek M. A. (2016). Industrial policies and outcomes: A comparison of pre-liberalized Korean and Turkish economies. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, Vol. 15, No. 1, рр. 179-200.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Тамбовцев В.Л. Нуждается ли промышленная политика в теоретических оправданиях? Вопросы экономики. 2017;(5):29-44. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-5-29-44
For citation:
Tambovtsev V. Does industrial policy need theoretical justifications? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2017;(5):29-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-5-29-44
Просмотров: 710
Послать статью по эл. почте 