|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Modern university as an economic growth driver: Models & missions
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-3-58-76
Abstract
The paper considers the modern university as an economic growth driver within the University 3.0 concept (education, research, and commercialization of knowledge). It demonstrates how the University 3.0 is becoming the basis for global competitiveness of national economies and international alliances, and how its business ecosystem generates new fast-growing industries, advanced technology markets and cost-efficient administrative territories.
References
1. Platova I., Zhabenko I. Time is essential: In the city on the Nеva the University 4.0 is being developed. What is the difference compared with other universities? Poisk, No. 30—31, рр. 8—9. (In Russian).
2. Etzkowitz G. (2010). On the way towards Skolkovo. In: Etzkowitz G. Triple helix: Universities—companies—state. Innovation in action. Tomsk: Tomsk State University of Management and Radio Electronics Publ., pp. 17—24. (In Russian).
3. Karpov A. (2012a). Engineering platform for the transfer of technologies. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 7, pp. 47—65. (In Russian).
4. Karpov A. O. (2012b). Locus of scientific talent: “Step into the future” programme. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, Vol. 82, No. 8, pp. 725—731. (In Russian).
5. Karpov A. O. (2013a). Open innovations and higher education. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii, No. 3, pp. 37—44. (In ¬Russian).
6. Karpov A.O. (2013b). Social paradigms and a paradigm-differentiated system of education. Voprosy Filosofii, No. 3, pp. 22—32. (In Russian).
7. Karpov A. O. (2014a). “Commoditization” of education against knowledge society. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, Vol. 84, No. 5, pp. 434—440. (In Russian).
8. Karpov A O. (2014b). Modern university: environment, partnership, innovations. Alma Mater. Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly, No. 8, pp. 8—12. (In Russian).
9. Karpov A. O. (2015а). Education for knowledge society: Genesis and social challenges. Obshchestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost, No. 5. рр. 86—101 (In Russian).
10. Karpov A. O. (2015b). Basic theoretical concepts of knowledge society. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, No. 9, pp. 812—820. (In Russian).
11. Monitoring (2016). Efficiency monitoring of innovation activity in Russian Universities. St. Petersburg: University ITMO; RVK. (In Russian).
12. National report (2015). National report on innovations in Russia 2015. Moscow: Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of the Russian Federation; Open Government; RVK. (In Russian).
13. Scott R. (2009). Innovative strategy in the Great Britain. Foresight, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 16—21. (In Russian).
14. Sosnova A. (2013). At its own place. There is room for innovations in Russia. Poisk, No. 26, p. 5. (In Russian).
15. Titov V. V. (1999). Technology transfer: A textbook. St. Petersburg: UNECON Publ. (In Russian).
16. Trow M. (1972). Sociology of education. In: G. V. Osipov (ed.). American sociology: Prospects, problems, methods. Moscow: Progress, pp. 174—187. (In Russian).
17. Chesbrough H. (2007). Open innovation. Moscow: Pokolenie. (In Russian).
18. Anderson R. (2010). The ‘Idea of a University’ today. History & Policy: [online serial], March 1, http://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/the-idea-of-a- university-today
19. Andrew J. P., De Rocco E. S., Taylor A. (2009). The innovation imperative in manufacturing: How the United States can restore its edge. Boston: BCG. Bell D. (2008). The axial age of technology foreword: 1999 // Bell D. (ed.). The coming of postindustrial society: A venture of social forecasting. N. Y.: Basic Books, pp. ix-lxxxvi.
20. Carayannis E. G., Campbell D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 46, No. 3/4, pp. 201-234.
21. Carayannis E. G., Campbell D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 41-69.
22. Cole J.R. (2010). The great American university: Its rise to preeminence, its indispensable nation role, why it must be protected. N. Y.: Public Affairs.
23. Dutta S., Lanvin B., Wunsch-Vincent S. (eds.) (2016). The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with global innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva: Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO.
24. EUA (2003). Response to the communication from the Commission “The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge”. Brussels: European University Association.
25. EUA (2007). Creativity in higher education: Report on the EUA Creative Project 2006-2007. Brussels: European University Association.
26. Curley M., Formica P. (2013a). University ecosystems design creative spaces for idea generation and start-up experimentation. In: M. Curley, P. Formica (eds.). The experimental nature of new venture creation: Capitalizing on open innovation 2.0. N. Y.: Springer, pp. 13-23.
27. Curley M., Formica Р. (2013b). Introduction. In: M. Curley, P. Formica (eds.). The experimental nature of new venture creation: Capitalizing on open innovation 2.0. N. Y.: Springer, pp. 1-12.
28. CEC (2003). The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
29. CEC (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
30. Drucker P. F. (2008). Concept of the corporation. New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Transaction Publ.
31. Drucker P. F. (1969). The age of discontinuity: guidelines to our changing society. L.: Heinemann.
32. Etzkowitz H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. N.Y. and London: Routledge.
33. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (1995). The Triple Helix: University-industry-govern-ment relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, Vol. 14, No. 1. Р. 14-19.
34. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2. P. 109-123.
35. Ferlie E., Musselin C., Andresani G. (2009). The governance of higher education systems: A public management perspective. In: C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, E. Ferlie (eds.). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1-20.
36. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
37. Greenaway D., Haynes M. (2003). Funding higher education in the UK: The role of fees and loans. Economic Journal, Vol. 113, No. 485, pp. 150-166.
38. Hammershoj L. G. (2009). Creativity as a question of Bildung. Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 545-557.
39. Lane J. E. (2013). Higher education system 3.0: Adding value to states and institutions. In: J. E. Lane, D. B. Johnstone (eds.). Higher education system 3.0: Harnessing systemness, delivering performance. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 3-26.
40. Machlup F. (2014). Knowledge: Its creation, distribution and economic significance. Vol. I: Knowledge and knowledge production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41. Machlup F., Kronwinkler T. (1975). Workers who produce knowledge: A steady increase, 1900 to 1970. Review of World Economics, Vol. 111, No. 4, pp. 752-759.
42. Martin P., Morris R., Rogers A., Kilgallon S. (2010). What are creative spaces? In: P. Martin (ed.). Making space for creativity. Brighton: University of Brighton, pp. 23-26.
43. Paradeise C., Reale E., Goastellec G. A. (2009a). Comporative approach to higher educations reform in Western European countries. In: C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, E. Ferlie (eds.). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 197-226.
44. Paradeise C., Reale E., Goastellec G., Bleiklie I. (2009b). Universities Steering between Stories and History. In: C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, E. Ferlie (eds.). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 227-290.
45. Pollеt C., Bouckaert G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Thursby J., Kemp S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 109-124.
Review
For citations:
Karpov A. Modern university as an economic growth driver: Models & missions. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2017;(3):58-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-3-58-76
Views:
1132
Email this article 
