Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Public investment efficiency and monetary policy consequences: The case of investment ratio enhancing policy in Russia

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-9-22-39

Abstract

The article analyzes the effects of measures to raise the investment rate from 21% to 25% of GDP up to 2024 on GDP growth and monetary policy. We conduct the analysis using an econometric general equilibrium model that reflects key features of the Russian economy. Achieving the target sequentially implies adding about 14 p. p. of GDP of public and/or private investment over 2019—2024 compared to the unchanged investment rate scenario. We find raising private investment to be the most efficient for stimulating GDP growth up to 2024. Among sources of public investment funding, using the sovereign wealth fund gives the highest GDP growth up to 2024. Nevertheless, given low public investment efficiency, a significant fraction of GDP growth becomes inflationary in this case. If the central bank minimizes the risk of inflation, inefficient public investment can lead the economy to equilibrium with higher private interest rates.

About the Authors

S. A. Vlasov
Bank of Russia
Russian Federation

Sergey A. Vlasov

Moscow



A. A. Sinyakov
Bank of Russia
Russian Federation

Andrey A. Sinyakov

Moscow



References

1. Abramov A., Radygin A., Chernova M. (2016). State-owned enterprises in the Russian market: Ownership structure and their role in the economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 12, pp. 61—87. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-12-61-87

2. Kudrin A., Knobel A. (2017). Fiscal policy as a source of economic growth. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 10, pp. 5—26. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-10-5-26

3. Abiad A., Furceri D., Topalova P. (2015). The macroeconomic effects of public investment: Evidence from advanced economies. IMF Working Paper, No. 95. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475578874.001

4. Angelini E., Bokan N., Christoffel K. P., Ciccarelli M., Zimic S. (2019). Introducing ECB-BASE: The blueprint of the new ECB semi-structural model for the euro area. ECB Working Paper Series, No. 2315.

5. Bulligan G., Busetti F., Caivano M., Cova P., Fantino D., Locarno A., Rodano M. L. (2017). The Bank of Italy econometric model: An update of the main equations and model elasticities. Bank of Italy Working Paper, No. 1130. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3040651

6. Bundesbank (2000). Macro­econometric multi­country model: MEMMOD. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.

7. Cavalcanti C. B., Marrero G. A., Minh Le T. (2014). Measuring the impact of debtfinanced public investment. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 6766. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6766

8. Cerra V., Fatás A., Saxena S. (2020). The persistence of a COVID-induced global recession. VoxEU.org, May 14. https://voxeu.org/article/persistence-covid-induced-global-recession

9. Coenen G., Kilponen J., Trabandt M. (2010). When does fiscal stimulus work? ECB Research Bulletin, No. 10.

10. De Jong J., Ferdinandusse M., Funda J., Vetlov I. (2017). The effect of public investment in Europe: A model-based assessment. ECB Working Paper Series, No. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2866/139475

11. Farhi E., Werning I. (2016). Fiscal multipliers: Liquidity traps and currency unions. In: J. B. Taylor, H. Uhlig (eds.). Handbook of macroeconomics, Vol. 2. Elsevier, pp. 2417—2492. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.06.006

12. Fujiwara I., Hara N., Hirose Y., Teranishi Y. (2005). The Japanese economic model (JEM). Monetary and Economic Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 61—142.

13. Hemming R., Kell M., Mahfouz S. (2002). The effectiveness of fiscal policy in stimulating economic activity: A review of the literature. IMF Working Paper, No. 208.

14. Hirakata N., Kan K., Kanafuji A., Kido Y., Kishaba Y., Murakoshi T., Shinohara T. (2019). The quarterly Japanese economic model (Q-JEM). Bank of Japan Working Paper Series, No. 19-E-7.

15. Ilzetzki E. (2011). Fiscal policy and debt dynamics in developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, No. 5666. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5666

16. Ilzetzki E., Mendoza E. G., Végh C. A. (2013). How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers? Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 60, pp. 239—254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011

17. Jordа Т., Singh S. R., Taylor A. M. (2020). The long-run effects of monetary policy. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper, No. 2020-01. https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2020-01

18. Papaioannou S. (2016). Public investment multipliers in EU countries: Does the efficiency of public sector matter? CEPR Discussion papers, No. 150. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2755247

19. Portes J. (2020). The lasting scars of the Covid-19 crisis: Channels and impacts. VoxEU. org, June 1. https://voxeu.org/article/lasting-scars-covid-19-crisis

20. Ramey V. A. (2016). Macroeconomic shocks and their propagation. In: J. B. Taylor, H. Uhlig (eds.). Handbook of macroeconomics, Vol. 2. Elsevier, pp. 71—162. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.003


Review

For citations:


Vlasov S.A., Sinyakov A.A. Public investment efficiency and monetary policy consequences: The case of investment ratio enhancing policy in Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2020;(9):22-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-9-22-39

Views: 1862


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)