

Opportunities for accelerating labor productivity growth: The role of small and medium enterprises
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-3-98-114
Abstract
The paper considers necessary conditions for acceleration of labor productivity growth in Russia. Based on micro data, as well as aggregate data, the paper quantifies the contribution of small and medium firms to labor productivity growth. It shows that mere increase of the number of small and medium enterprises is not as important for positive effects of these programs, as qualitative improvements: development of favorable environment for growth, which is largely determined by business climate. Accelerating productivity growth involves redistribution of labor and capital from inefficient to efficient enterprises. In particular, it is necessary to create conditions, which allow a firm to grow after it enters the market instead of stagnating as a small firm with low efficiency. At the same time, it is necessary for ineffective firms, which exhausted their growth potential, to have an opportunity to exit the market easily leaving resources including labor to fast-growing companies.
About the Authors
Evguenia V. BessonovaRussian Federation
Moscow
Alexander G. Morozov
Russian Federation
Moscow
Natalia A. Turdyeva
Russian Federation
Moscow
Anna N. Tsvetkova
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Baranov E. F., Bessonov V. A. A view at the Russian economic transformation. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 142—158. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-11-142-158
2. Bessonov V. A., Gimpelson V. E., Kuzminov Y. I., Yasin E. G. (2009). Productivity and factors of long-term development of the Russian economy. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).
3. Bessonova E. V. (2018). Analysis of Russian firms’ TFP growth in 2009—2015. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 7, pp. 96—118 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-7-96-118
4. Gimpelson V.E., Sharunina A. V. (2015). Flows in the Russian labor market: 2000—2012. HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 313—348. (In Russian).
5. Lisin V. S., Yanovskiy K. E. et al. (2011). Institutional constraints of current economic growth. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).
6. Orekhova S.V., Kislitsyn E.V. (2019). Total factor productivity in the Russian industry: Small vs large enterprises. Journal of New Economy, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 127—144. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-2-8
7. Akcigit U., Ates S. T. (2019). What happened to US business dynamism? NBER Working Paper, No. 25756. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25756
8. Akcigit U., Alp H., Peters M. (2016). Lack of selection and limits to delegation: firm dynamics in developing countries. NBER Working Paper, No. 21905. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21905
9. Bartelsman E., Haltiwanger J., Scarpetta S. (2013). Cross-country differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection. American Economic Review, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 305—34. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.1.305
10. Decker R. A., Haltiwanger J., Jarmin R. S., Miranda J. (2017). Declining dynamism, allocative efficiency, and the productivity slowdown. American Economic Review, Vol. 107, No. 5, pp. 322—326. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171020
11. De Vries G. J., Erumban A. A., Timmer M. P., Voskoboynikov I., Wu H. X. (2012). Deconstructing the BRICs: Structural transformation and aggregate productivity growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 211—227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.02.004
12. Goswami A. G., Medvedev D., Olafsen E. (2019). High-growth firms: Facts, fiction, and policy options for emerging economies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
13. Haltiwanger J., Jarmin R.S., Miranda J. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 347—361. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00288
14. Hsieh C.T., Klenow P.J. (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 124, No. 4, pp. 1403—1448. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1403
15. Linarello A., Petrella A. (2017). Productivity and reallocation: evidence from the universe of Italian firms. International Productivity Monitor, No. 32, pp. 116—136.
16. Melitz M. J., Polanec S. (2015). Dynamic Olley-Pakes productivity decomposition with entry and exit. Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 362—375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12088
17. Midrigan V., Xu D. Y. (2014). Finance and misallocation: Evidence from plant-level data. American Economic Review, Vol. 104, No. 2, pp. 422—458. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.422
18. Pagano P., Schivardi F. (2003). Firm size distribution and growth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 105, No. 2, pp. 255—274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.t01-1-00008
19. Popova S. (2019). Idiosyncratic shocks: estimation and the impact on aggregate fluctuations. Bank of Russia Working Papers, No. 46.
20. Voskoboynikov I. B. (2017). Sources of long run growth of the Russian economy before and after the global financial crisis. Russian Journal of Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 348—365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.12.003
21. Voskoboynikov I. B. (2019). Structural change, expanding informality and labor productivity growth in Russia. Review of Income and Wealth, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12417
22. Wildnerova L., Blöchliger H. (2019). What makes a productive Russian firm? A comparative analysis using firm-level data. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1592
Review
For citations:
Bessonova E.V., Morozov A.G., Turdyeva N.A., Tsvetkova A.N. Opportunities for accelerating labor productivity growth: The role of small and medium enterprises. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2020;(3):98-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-3-98-114