

What kind of Russian firms get state support? The analysis of changes in priorities under crisis conditions
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-3-47-62
Abstract
The paper analyzes the shifts in government priorities in terms of support of big and medium manufacturing enterprises amid 2008—2009 and 2014—2015 crises. Based on the data of 2009, 2014 and 2018 surveys of Russian manufacturing firms, using logit regressions we identify factors that affect the receipt of financial and organizational support at different levels of government. The analysis shows that in 2012—2013 the share of manufacturing firms that received state support shrank significantly as compared to 2007—2008; moreover, the support concentrated on enterprises that had access to lobbying resource (such as state participation in the ownership or business associations membership). In 2016—2017 the scale of state support coverage recovered. However, the support at all levels of government was provided to firms that carried out investment and provided assistance to regional or local authorities in social development of the region, while the factor of state participation in the ownership became insignificant. The paper provides possible explanation for these shifts in the criteria of state support provision in Russia.
About the Authors
Andrei A. YakovlevRussian Federation
Moscow
Nina V. Ershova
Russian Federation
Moscow
Olga M. Uvarova
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Kislitsyn D. (2013). Government support policy of the Russian enterprises during the 2008—2009 crisis: Criteria of treating the companies as “strategic”. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 6, pp. 84—99. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-6-84-99
2. Kuznetsov B. V., Simachev Yu. V. (2014). Evolution of state industrial policy in Russia. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 22, pp. 152—179. (In Russian).
3. Kuzyk M. G., Kuznetsov B. V., Simachev Yu. V. (2010). Assessment of the impact of various anti-crisis measures on manufacturing enterprises. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, No. 1, pp. 122—134. (In Russian).
4. Simachev Yu. V., Kuzyk M. G., Zudin N. N. (2017). The impact of public funding and tax incentives on Russian firms: Additionality effects evaluation. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 2, pp. 59—93. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2017-34-2-3
5. Yakovlev A. A. (2010). Providing state support to enterprises at different levels of government: Differences in priorities. Voprosy Gosydarstvennogo i Munitsipalnogo Upravleniya, No. 2, pp. 5—22. (In Russian).
6. Yakovlev A. A., Govorun A. V. (2011). Business associations as an instrument for interaction between government and entrepreneurs: The results of empirical analysis. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 9, pp. 98—127. (In Russian).
7. Amsden A. (1989). Asia’s next giant. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Doner R. F., Schneider B. R. (2016). The middle-income trap: More politics than economics. World Politics, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 608—644. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887116000095
9. Duvanova D. (2011). Firm lobbying versus sectoral organization: The analysis of business-state relations in post-communist Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 387—409. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.27.4.387
10. Faccio M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 369—386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704
11. Fisman R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 4, pp. 1095—1102. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.1095
12. Frye T. (2002). Capture or exchange? Business lobbying in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 54, No. 8, pp. 1017—1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966813022000017113
13. Frye T., Shleifer A. (1997). The invisible hand and the grabbing hand. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 354—358. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5856
14. Frye T., Yakovlev A., Yasin Y. (2009). The “other” Russian economy: How everyday firms view the rules of the game in Russia. Social Research: An International Quarterly, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 29—54
15. Guriev S., Rachinsky A. (2005). The role of oligarchs in Russian capitalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 131—150. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147994
16. Haaparanta P., Juurikkala T., Lazareva O., Pirttila J., Solanko L., Zhuravskaya E. (2003). Firms and public service provision in Russia. BOFIT Discussion Paper, No. 16/2003.
17. Hausmann R., Hidalgo C. A., Bustos S., Coscia M., Chung S., Jimenez J., Simoes A., Yildirim M. A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. MIT Press.
18. Hellman J. S., Jones G., Kaufman D. (2003). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture and influence in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 751—773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2003.09.006
19. Jensen N. M. (2002). Economic reform, state capture, and international investment in transition economies. Journal of International Development, Vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 973—977. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.937
20. Johnson C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925—75. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
21. Juurikkala T., Lazareva O. (2006). Lobbying at the local level: Social assets in Russian firms. BOFIT Discussion Paper, No. 1/2006.
22. Krueger A. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 291—303. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685118
23. Kuznetsov B., Dolgopyatova T. G., Golikova V., Gonchar K. R., Yakovlev A. A., Yasin E. (2011). Russian manufacturing revisited: Industrial enterprises at the start of the crisis. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 1—37. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.27.4.366
24. Murphy K. M., Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. (1993). Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 409—414.
25. Nikulin A. M., Trotsuk I., Wegren S. K. (2017). The importance of strong regional leadership in Russia: The Belgorod miracle in agriculture. Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 316—339. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2017.1355250
26. Olson M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Rodrik D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. KSG Working Paper, No. RWP04-047.
28. Rodrik D. (2005). Growth strategies. In: P. Aghion, S. N. Durlauf (eds.). Handbook of economic growth, Vol. 1, Part A. Elsevier, pp. 967—1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01014-2
29. Rodrik D. (2008). Normalizing industrial policy. Commission on growth and development Working Paper, No. 3. Washington, DC: World Bank.
30. Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. (2002). The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Harvard University Press.
31. Slinko I., Yakovlev E., Zhuravskaya E. (2005). Laws for sale: Evidence from Russia. American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 284—318. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahi010
32. Solanko L. (2006). Coping with missing public infrastructure: An analysis of Russian industrial enterprises. BOFIT Discussion Paper, No. 2/2006.
33. Stigler G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 3—21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160
34. Szakonyi D. (2018). Businesspeople in elected office: Identifying private benefits from firm-level returns. American Political Science Review, Vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 322—338. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000600
35. Yakovlev A. (2014). Russian modernization: Between the need for new players and the fear of losing control of rent sources. Journal of Eurasian Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 10—20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2013.09.004
36. Yakovlev A. (2016). What is Russia trying to defend? Russian Journal of Economics, No. 2, pp. 146—161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2016.06.003
37. Zimin D. (2010). Promoting investment in Russia’s regions. Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 653—668. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.51.5.653
Review
For citations:
Yakovlev A.A., Ershova N.V., Uvarova O.M. What kind of Russian firms get state support? The analysis of changes in priorities under crisis conditions. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2020;(3):47-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-3-47-62