

Determinants of return rates of Russian equity and bond mutual funds: Active investment strategies and commissions
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-9-40-60
Abstract
In our paper, we study the impact of active investment strategies and factors of their success in the Russian market of collective investment — self-confidence of managers, commissions of management companies (MC) — on return rates of mutual funds. For the first time, not only equity mutual funds, but also bond mutual funds are considered as an object of study; the time period is since 2012. Our study is based on data on the structure of mutual fund portfolios provided by Investfunds. We propose a number of original indicators of an active management style and consider the profitability of mutual funds relative to various benchmarks. Based on testing of multivariate regression models, it has been revealed that the return rate of equity mutual funds is negatively affected by a share of stocks in the fund portfolio which are not included in the market index. When managers take into account their previous negative investment experience, it contributes to the growth of mutual fund return rates. Active investment strategies correlate with increased commissions (up to 4.5% of NAV), but they do not allow an investor to receive higher return rates than index investments. An increase in the share of corporate bonds allows the fund manager to outperform benchmarks for bond funds. For the first time, a nonlinear relationship between the size of mutual funds and the value of commissions has been revealed for the Russian market.
About the Authors
T. V. TeplovaRussian Federation
Tamara V. Teplova
Moscow
T. V. Sokolova
Russian Federation
Tatiana V. Sokolova
Moscow
A. Fasano
Italy
Antonio Fasano
Rome
V. A. Rodina
Russian Federation
Victoria A. Rodina
Moscow
References
1. Abramov A. E., Akshentseva K. S., Radygin A. D. (2015). Mutual funds performance in Russia. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 60—86. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2015-4-04
2. Abramov A. E., Radygin A. D., Chernova M. I. (2019). Efficiency in portfolio management of equity funds and methods of its evaluation. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 8—47. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2019-4-8-47
3. Abramov A., Chernova M. (2019). Information is the engine of progress. Vestnik NAUFOR, No. 7—8. (In Russian). http://www.naufor.ru/tree.asp?n=17320
4. Bank of Russia (2019). Mutual and equity funds key indicators review: Q3 2019. (In Russian). https://www.cbr.ru/Collection/Collection/File/26897/review_paif_19Q3.pdf
5. Bank of Russia (2020). Annual report 2019. (In Russian). https://www.cbr.ru/Collection/Collection/File/27873/ar_2019.pdf
6. Inozemtsev E. V., Tarassov E. B. (2018). Actively managed Russian mutual funds: Good or bad for investors? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 3, pp. 64—79. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-3-64-79
7. Parshakov P. A. (2015). Assessment of skills of Russian asset managers. Applied Econometrics, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 57—66. (In Russian).
8. Bhojraj S., Cho Y., Yehuda N. (2011). Mutual fund family size and mutual fund performance: The role of regulatory changes. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 647—684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00436.x
9. Chen J. G., Hong H., Huаng M., Kubik D. J. (2013). Outsourcing mutuаl fund mаnаgеmеnt: Firm boundаriеs, incеntivеs аnd pеrformаncе. Thе Journаl of Finаncе, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 523—558. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12006
10. Crеmеrs K. J. M., Pеtаjisto А. (2009). How activе is your fund mаnаgеr? А nеw mеаsurе that predicts pеrformаncе. Rеviеw of Finаnciаl Studiеs, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 3329—3365. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp057
11. Cremers M., Ferreira M., Matos P., Starks L. (2016). Indexing and active fund management: International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 539—560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.02.008
12. Cuthbertson K., Nitzsche D., O’Sullivan N. (2016). A review of behavioural and management effects in mutual fund performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 44, No. C, pp. 162—176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.01.016
13. Fama E. F., French K. R. (2010). Luck versus skill in the cross-section of mutual fund returns. Journal of Finance, Vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 1915—1947. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01598.x
14. Fеrrеirа M., Kеswаni А., Miguеl А. F., Rаmos S. (2013). Thе dеtеrminаnts of mutuаl fund pеrformаncе: А cross-country study. Rеviеw of Finаncе, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 483—525. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfs013
15. Hаmmаmi Y., Ouеslаti А. (2017). Mеаsuring skill in thе Islаmic mutuаl fund industry : Еvidеncе from GCC countriеs. Journаl of Intеrnаtionаl Finаnciаl Mаrkеts, Institutions аnd Monеy, Vol. 49, No. C, pp. 15—31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.02.002
16. Hirshlеifеr D., Low A., Teoh S. H. (2012). Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? Journal of Finance, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 1457—1498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01753.x
17. Jensen M. C. (1967). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945—1964. Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 389—416. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.244153
18. Kаcpеrczyk M., Siаlm C., Zhеng L. (2008). Unobsеrvеd actions of mutuаl funds. Rеviеw of Finаnciаl Studiеs, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 2379—2416. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhl041
19. Monjаzеb M., Rаmаzаnpour Е. (2013). Thе effеct of economic fаctors on thе efficiеncy of mutuаl funds in Irаn. Tеchnicаl Journаl of Еnginееring аnd Аppliеd Sciеncеs, Vol. 3, No. 15, pp. 1707—1711.
20. Phillips B., Pukthuanthong K., Rau P. R. (2018). Size does not matter: Diseconomies of scale in the mutual fund industry revisited. Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 88, pp. 357—365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.12.005
21. Sharpe W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. Part 2: Supplement on security prices. Journal of Business, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 119—138. https://doi.org/10.1086/294846
22. Ting I. W. K., Azizan N. A., Kweh Q. L. (2015). Upper echelon theory revisited: The relationship between CEO personal characteristics and financial leverage decision. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 195, pp. 686—694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.276
Review
For citations:
Teplova T.V., Sokolova T.V., Fasano A., Rodina V.A. Determinants of return rates of Russian equity and bond mutual funds: Active investment strategies and commissions. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2020;(9):40-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-9-40-60