Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Measuring quality-based competitiveness: What’s wrong with high-tech exports?
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-6-80-103
Abstract
We propose an approach to measure countries’ quality-based competitiveness relying on the share of high-tech products in exports and R&D intensity. We try to cope with the issue of discrepancy between the level of technological development of countries and the share of high-tech products in their exports that arises as a result of assembly production, re-exports, unequal endowments of “high-tech raw materials” and the attractiveness of tax havens. The task of the paper is to ensure the correct use of data on trade in high-tech products as a proxy for countries’ level of technological development. Relying on statistical and graphical analysis methods, we show that the problem is more complex that is generally considered, and that the ways to solve it proposed in the literature (primarily, subtracting intermediate imports) are far from being sufficient. We propose the index of R&D intensity at the product level based on the data on export structure (by products and producing countries) and R&D intensity, and calculate the weighted average R&D intensity that corresponds to each country’s export structure. As a result, we provide an updated view on the leading countries by the share of high-tech products in exports that is consistent with the traditional list of leaders by R&D intensity (Japan, South Korea, Israel, Germany, USA, and France). We also demonstrate that China, even after the adjustment procedure, is still a member of the technology leaders’ club.
About the Author
A. A. Gnidchenko
Center for Macroeconomic Analysis and Short-Term Forecasting; Institute of Economic Forecasting, RAS; National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Gnidchenko
Moscow
References
1. Aiginger K. (1997). The use of unit values to discriminate between price and quality competition. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 571—592. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013687
2. Aiginger K., Bärenthaler-Sieber S., Vogel J. (2013). Competitiveness under new perspectives. WIFO WWWforEurope Working Papers, No. 44.
3. Barry F., Bergin A. (2013). Offshoring, inward investment, and export performance in Ireland. In: A. Bardhan, D. Jaffee, C. Kroll (eds.). The Oxford handbook of offshoring and global employment. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 311—334. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199765904.013.0013
4. Braunerhjelm P., Thulin P. (2008). Can countries create comparative advantages? R&D expenditures, high-tech exports and country size in 19 OECD countries, 1981—1999. International Economic Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 95—111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168730801887026
5. Bykova A., Ghodsi M., Stehrer R. (2018). The evolution of trade unit values: A measurement on quality. WIIW Research Reports, No. 431.
6. Edwards L., Lawrence R. (2010). Do developed and developing countries compete head to head in high-tech? NBER Working Papers, No. 16105. https://doi.org/10.3386/w16105
7. Falk M. (2009). High-tech exports and economic growth in industrialized countries . Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 16, pp. 1025—1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850701222228
8. Galindo-Rueda F., Verger F. (2016). OECD taxonomy of economic activities based on R&D intensity. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2016/04.
9. Hallak J. (2006). Product quality and the direction of trade. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 238—265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.04.001
10. Hatzichronoglou T. (1997). Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 1997/02.
11. Hausmann R., Hwang J., Rodrik D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1—25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4
12. Lall S. (2000). The technological structure and performance of developing country manufacturing exports, 1985—98. Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 337—369. https://doi.org/10.1080/713688318
13. Lall S., Weiss J., Zhang J. (2006). The “sophistication” of exports: A new trade measure. World Development, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 222—237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.09.002
14. Minondo A. (2010). Exports’ quality-adjusted productivity and economic growth. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 257—287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638190802573071
15. Pham C., Nguyen X., Sgro P., Tang X. (2017). Has China displaced its competitors in high-tech trade? The World Economy, Vol. 40, No. 8, pp. 1569—1596. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12390
16. Schott P. (2004). Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 119, No. 2, pp. 647—678. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041382201
17. Srholec M. (2007). High-tech exports from developing countries: A symptom of technology spurts or statistical illusion? Review of World Economics, Vol. 143, No. 2, pp. 227—255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0106-z
18. Xing Y. (2014). China’s high-tech exports: The myth and reality. Asian Economic Papers, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 109—123. https://doi.org/10.1162/ASEP_a_00256
Review
For citations:
Gnidchenko A.A. Measuring quality-based competitiveness: What’s wrong with high-tech exports? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2020;(6):80-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-6-80-103
Views:
1657
Email this article 
