Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Privatization of pension system in Chile and formation of new pension orthodoxy

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-9-40-54

Abstract

In 1981 in Chile the Pinochet regime reformed the state-led PAYG pension system into the private pension system. Chilean experiment attracted the attention of both politicians and experts around the world and laid the foundations for the new pension orthodoxy. As a result, more than 30 countries (mostly in Latin America and in the former Soviet bloc) followed the Chilean model and privatized pension systems. The paper considers the design and results of the Chilean pension reform. The aim of the paper is to show the specific path of transformation of theoretical concepts into actual economic policy. The research provides two key results. The first is that although pension reforms of recent decades were influenced by the ideas of liberalism, their design and implementation in fact suited the pattern of the new paternalism characteristic of “neoliberalism”. The second is that implementation of the Chilean model in other countries was due to the persuasiveness of the discourse of the new pension orthodoxy rather than to actual performance of the Chilean pension system.

About the Authors

Denis V. Melnik
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Moscow


Mikhail I. Miryakov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Moscow


References

1. Avtonomov V. (2015). Which human qualities can economic liberalism be based on? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 8, pp. 5—24. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-8-5-24

2. Ananyin O. I., Khaitkulov R. G., Shestakov D. E. (2010). Washington consensus: Landscape after battles. Mirovaya Economika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, No. 12, pp. 15—27. (In Russian).

3. Kapeliushnikov R. (2013a). Behavioral economics and new paternalism (Part I). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 9, pp. 66—90. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-9-66-90

4. Kapeliushnikov R. (2013b). Behavioral economics and new paternalism (Part II). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 10, pp. 28—46. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-10-28-46

5. Melnik D. V., Miryakov M. I. (2019). Pension reforms in post-communist countries: mechanisms of diffusion of new pension orthodoxy. Obshchestvennye Nayki i Sovremennost, No. 2, pp. 79—90. (In Russian).

6. Podkorytov R. A. (2009). Is it possible to apply the Chilean experience in reforming the pension system in Russia? Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 6: Economika, No. 5, pp. 23—34. (In Russian).

7. Friedman М. (2005). Capitalism and freedom. Moscow: Liberalnaya missiya foundation, Novoye Izdatelstvo. (In Russian).

8. Acuña R., Iglesias A. (2001). Chile’s pension reform after 20 years. World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper, No. 129. Washington, DC: World Bank.

9. Altiparmakov N., Nedeljković M. (2018). Does Pension Privatization Increase Economic Growth? Evidence from Latin America and Eastern Europe. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 46—84. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474747216000160

10. Arellano J. P. (1985). Social policies in Chile: an historical review. Journal of Latin American Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 397—418. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x0000794x

11. Barr N., Diamond P. (2016). Reforming pensions in Chile. Polityka Społeczna, No. 1, pp. 4—8.

12. Borzutzky S. (2012). Pension market failure in Chile: Foundations, analysis and policy reforms. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 103—112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486831.2012.655980

13. Emol (2013). Reforma previsional: José Piñera acusa al Presidente de “confundir ” a chilenos. Emol, June 19. https://www.emol.com/noticias/economia/2013/06/19/604567/jose-pinera-acusa-al-presidente-de-confundir-a-chilenos-con-anuncio-de-reforma-previsional.html

14. Emol (2018). Desde un bono para pensionados de clase media al retiro parcial de nuevos ahorros: Las claves de la reforma de pensiones. Emol, October 29. https://www.emol.com/noticias/Economia/2018/10/29/925578/Diez-claves-del-proyecto-de-reforma-de-pensiones.html

15. George V. (1991). Social security in the USSR. International Social Security Review, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 47—64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246x.1991.tb00895.x

16. Hyde M., Borzutzky S. (2015). Chile’s “Neoliberal” retirement system? Concentration, competition, and economic predation in “private” pensions. Poverty & Public Policy, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 123—157. https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.98

17. James E. (1998). The political economy of social security reform: A cross-country review. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 451—482. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8292.00090

18. Kremerman M. (2019). Reforma al Sistema de Pensiones del gobierno de Piñera (I): el fracaso de las AFP y las cuentas individuales. CIPER, March 21. https://ciperchile.cl/2019/03/21/reforma-al-sistema-de-pensiones-del-gobierno-de-pinera-i-el-fracaso-de-las-afp-y-las-cuentas-individuales/

19. McGuire J. W. (2010). Wealth, health, and democracy in East Asia and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

20. Mittelstaedt H. F., Olsen J. C. (2003). An empirical analysis of the investment performance of the Chilean pension system. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 7—24. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474747202001208

21. Montes R. (2018). Chile planea reformar el sistema de pensiones que Brasil quiere imitar. El Paìs, November 8. https://elpais.com/internacional/2018/11/08/america/1541692162_299156.html

22. Müller K. (2003). The making of pension privatization in Latin America and Eastern Europe. In: Holzmann R., Orenstein M., Rutkowski M. (eds.) Pension reform in Europe: Process and progress. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 47—78.

23. OECD (2016). Pension Markets in Focus 2016. https://www.oecd.org/daf/fin/private-pensions/Pension-Markets-in-Focus-2016.pdf

24. Orenstein M. A. (2003). Mapping the diffusion of pension innovation. In: Holzmann R., Orenstein M., Rutkowski M. (eds.). Pension reform in Europe: Process and progress . Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 171—193.

25. Orenstein M. A. (2008). Privatizing pensions: The transnational campaign for social security reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

26. Piñera J. (1996). Empowering workers: The privatization of social security in Chile. Cato’s letter, No. 10. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.

27. Piñera J. (2000). A chilean model for Russia. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 5, pp. 62—73. https://doi.org/10.2307/20049888

28. Piñera J. (2006). Milton Friedman y sus recomendaciones a Chile. Elcato.org, November 17. https://www.elcato.org/milton-friedman-y-sus-recomendaciones-chile

29. Reuters (2018). Piñera anuncia reforma pensiones en Chile, considera alza aporte, más competencia e incentivos. Reuters, October 29. https://lta.reuters.com/articulo/topNews/idLTAKCN1N302C-OUSLT

30. Ruiz-Tagle J. V., Castro F. (2001). The chilean pension system. OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 117—137. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v1-art7-en

31. Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.

32. Weyland K. (2005). Theories of policy diffusion lessons from Latin American pension reform. World Politics, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 262—295. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2005.0019

33. World Bank (1994). Averting the old age crisis: Policies to protect the old and promote growth. New York: Oxford University Press.


Review

For citations:


Melnik D.V., Miryakov M.I. Privatization of pension system in Chile and formation of new pension orthodoxy. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2019;(9):40-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-9-40-54

Views: 1829


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)